Zoophilia and the law: Legal responses to a rare paraphilia

Brian Holoyda, William Newman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although societies' responses to bestiality have varied internationally, the response in the United States has typically involved condemnation and prosecution. Currently, there are 31 states with statutes prohibiting human– animal sexual contact. Despite the prevalence of antibestiality legislation, there is limited case law in the United States. Most commonly, bestiality arises in legal cases involving sexually violent predator (SVP) civil commitments. Identifying offenders who commit acts of bestiality is important, since these individuals may be at increased risk of committing a variety of other sexually and nonsexually violent acts against humans. Because of the different laws among the states, however, commonly used forensic risk assessment tools for sexual recidivism can yield different scores for individuals charged with or convicted of bestiality offenses. Forensic evaluators should consider this factor when conducting risk assessments. State legislatures should also consider modernizing their bestiality statutes to accord with current terminology and objectives for such laws.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)412-420
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
Volume42
Issue number4
StatePublished - Dec 1 2014

Fingerprint

Paraphilic Disorders
Legislation
Terminology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Cite this

Zoophilia and the law : Legal responses to a rare paraphilia. / Holoyda, Brian; Newman, William.

In: Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, Vol. 42, No. 4, 01.12.2014, p. 412-420.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Holoyda, Brian ; Newman, William. / Zoophilia and the law : Legal responses to a rare paraphilia. In: Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law. 2014 ; Vol. 42, No. 4. pp. 412-420.
@article{6f3b20757a6d4324bd5667b2463cc95a,
title = "Zoophilia and the law: Legal responses to a rare paraphilia",
abstract = "Although societies' responses to bestiality have varied internationally, the response in the United States has typically involved condemnation and prosecution. Currently, there are 31 states with statutes prohibiting human– animal sexual contact. Despite the prevalence of antibestiality legislation, there is limited case law in the United States. Most commonly, bestiality arises in legal cases involving sexually violent predator (SVP) civil commitments. Identifying offenders who commit acts of bestiality is important, since these individuals may be at increased risk of committing a variety of other sexually and nonsexually violent acts against humans. Because of the different laws among the states, however, commonly used forensic risk assessment tools for sexual recidivism can yield different scores for individuals charged with or convicted of bestiality offenses. Forensic evaluators should consider this factor when conducting risk assessments. State legislatures should also consider modernizing their bestiality statutes to accord with current terminology and objectives for such laws.",
author = "Brian Holoyda and William Newman",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "412--420",
journal = "Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law",
issn = "1093-6793",
publisher = "American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Zoophilia and the law

T2 - Legal responses to a rare paraphilia

AU - Holoyda, Brian

AU - Newman, William

PY - 2014/12/1

Y1 - 2014/12/1

N2 - Although societies' responses to bestiality have varied internationally, the response in the United States has typically involved condemnation and prosecution. Currently, there are 31 states with statutes prohibiting human– animal sexual contact. Despite the prevalence of antibestiality legislation, there is limited case law in the United States. Most commonly, bestiality arises in legal cases involving sexually violent predator (SVP) civil commitments. Identifying offenders who commit acts of bestiality is important, since these individuals may be at increased risk of committing a variety of other sexually and nonsexually violent acts against humans. Because of the different laws among the states, however, commonly used forensic risk assessment tools for sexual recidivism can yield different scores for individuals charged with or convicted of bestiality offenses. Forensic evaluators should consider this factor when conducting risk assessments. State legislatures should also consider modernizing their bestiality statutes to accord with current terminology and objectives for such laws.

AB - Although societies' responses to bestiality have varied internationally, the response in the United States has typically involved condemnation and prosecution. Currently, there are 31 states with statutes prohibiting human– animal sexual contact. Despite the prevalence of antibestiality legislation, there is limited case law in the United States. Most commonly, bestiality arises in legal cases involving sexually violent predator (SVP) civil commitments. Identifying offenders who commit acts of bestiality is important, since these individuals may be at increased risk of committing a variety of other sexually and nonsexually violent acts against humans. Because of the different laws among the states, however, commonly used forensic risk assessment tools for sexual recidivism can yield different scores for individuals charged with or convicted of bestiality offenses. Forensic evaluators should consider this factor when conducting risk assessments. State legislatures should also consider modernizing their bestiality statutes to accord with current terminology and objectives for such laws.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84916604830&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84916604830&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 25492066

AN - SCOPUS:84916604830

VL - 42

SP - 412

EP - 420

JO - Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

JF - Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

SN - 1093-6793

IS - 4

ER -