Young children's fast mapping and generalization of words, facts, and pictograms

Gedeon O. Deák, Alexis Toney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To test general and specific processes of symbol learning, 4- and 5-year-old children learned three kinds of abstract associates for novel objects: words, facts, and pictograms. To test fast mapping (i.e., one-trial learning) and subsequent learning, comprehension was tested after each of four exposures. Production was also tested, as was children's tendency to generalize learned items to new objects in the same taxon. To test for a bias toward mutually exclusive associations, children learned either one-to-one or many-to-many mappings. In Experiment 1, children learned words, facts (with or without incidental novel words), or pictograms. In Experiment 2, children learned words or pictograms. In both of these experiments, children learned words slower than facts and pictograms. Pictograms and facts were generalized more systematically than words, but only in Experiment 1. Children learned one-to-one mappings faster only in Experiment 2, when cognitive load was increased. In Experiment 3, 3- and 4-year-olds were taught facts (with novel words), words, and pictograms. Children learned facts faster than words; however, they remembered all items equally well a week later. The results suggest that word learning follows non-specialized memory and associative learning processes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)273-296
Number of pages24
JournalJournal of Experimental Child Psychology
Volume115
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Learning
Generalization (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Children's drawing
  • Constraints
  • Fast mapping
  • Inductive inference
  • Mutual exclusivity
  • Semiotics
  • Verbal working memory
  • Word learning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Young children's fast mapping and generalization of words, facts, and pictograms. / Deák, Gedeon O.; Toney, Alexis.

In: Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, Vol. 115, No. 2, 01.06.2013, p. 273-296.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{17512d4982e74b0ca55da8f707c8abd7,
title = "Young children's fast mapping and generalization of words, facts, and pictograms",
abstract = "To test general and specific processes of symbol learning, 4- and 5-year-old children learned three kinds of abstract associates for novel objects: words, facts, and pictograms. To test fast mapping (i.e., one-trial learning) and subsequent learning, comprehension was tested after each of four exposures. Production was also tested, as was children's tendency to generalize learned items to new objects in the same taxon. To test for a bias toward mutually exclusive associations, children learned either one-to-one or many-to-many mappings. In Experiment 1, children learned words, facts (with or without incidental novel words), or pictograms. In Experiment 2, children learned words or pictograms. In both of these experiments, children learned words slower than facts and pictograms. Pictograms and facts were generalized more systematically than words, but only in Experiment 1. Children learned one-to-one mappings faster only in Experiment 2, when cognitive load was increased. In Experiment 3, 3- and 4-year-olds were taught facts (with novel words), words, and pictograms. Children learned facts faster than words; however, they remembered all items equally well a week later. The results suggest that word learning follows non-specialized memory and associative learning processes.",
keywords = "Children's drawing, Constraints, Fast mapping, Inductive inference, Mutual exclusivity, Semiotics, Verbal working memory, Word learning",
author = "De{\'a}k, {Gedeon O.} and Alexis Toney",
year = "2013",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jecp.2013.02.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "115",
pages = "273--296",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Child Psychology",
issn = "0022-0965",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Young children's fast mapping and generalization of words, facts, and pictograms

AU - Deák, Gedeon O.

AU - Toney, Alexis

PY - 2013/6/1

Y1 - 2013/6/1

N2 - To test general and specific processes of symbol learning, 4- and 5-year-old children learned three kinds of abstract associates for novel objects: words, facts, and pictograms. To test fast mapping (i.e., one-trial learning) and subsequent learning, comprehension was tested after each of four exposures. Production was also tested, as was children's tendency to generalize learned items to new objects in the same taxon. To test for a bias toward mutually exclusive associations, children learned either one-to-one or many-to-many mappings. In Experiment 1, children learned words, facts (with or without incidental novel words), or pictograms. In Experiment 2, children learned words or pictograms. In both of these experiments, children learned words slower than facts and pictograms. Pictograms and facts were generalized more systematically than words, but only in Experiment 1. Children learned one-to-one mappings faster only in Experiment 2, when cognitive load was increased. In Experiment 3, 3- and 4-year-olds were taught facts (with novel words), words, and pictograms. Children learned facts faster than words; however, they remembered all items equally well a week later. The results suggest that word learning follows non-specialized memory and associative learning processes.

AB - To test general and specific processes of symbol learning, 4- and 5-year-old children learned three kinds of abstract associates for novel objects: words, facts, and pictograms. To test fast mapping (i.e., one-trial learning) and subsequent learning, comprehension was tested after each of four exposures. Production was also tested, as was children's tendency to generalize learned items to new objects in the same taxon. To test for a bias toward mutually exclusive associations, children learned either one-to-one or many-to-many mappings. In Experiment 1, children learned words, facts (with or without incidental novel words), or pictograms. In Experiment 2, children learned words or pictograms. In both of these experiments, children learned words slower than facts and pictograms. Pictograms and facts were generalized more systematically than words, but only in Experiment 1. Children learned one-to-one mappings faster only in Experiment 2, when cognitive load was increased. In Experiment 3, 3- and 4-year-olds were taught facts (with novel words), words, and pictograms. Children learned facts faster than words; however, they remembered all items equally well a week later. The results suggest that word learning follows non-specialized memory and associative learning processes.

KW - Children's drawing

KW - Constraints

KW - Fast mapping

KW - Inductive inference

KW - Mutual exclusivity

KW - Semiotics

KW - Verbal working memory

KW - Word learning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875855086&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875855086&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jecp.2013.02.004

DO - 10.1016/j.jecp.2013.02.004

M3 - Article

VL - 115

SP - 273

EP - 296

JO - Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

JF - Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

SN - 0022-0965

IS - 2

ER -