Work productivity of people with a psychiatric disability working in social firms

Marc Corbiere, Sara Zaniboni, Carolyn S Dewa, Patrizia Villotti, Tania Lecomte, Hélène Sultan-Taïeb, Julie Hupé, Franco Fraccaroli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Several factors impact work productivity in employees with a psychiatric condition. OBJECTIVE: In the context of social firms (SFs) the goal of this study is to test a theoretical model to predict work productivity across time, while considering worker and workplace factors. METHODS: 222 people with a psychiatric disability employed in SFs were enrolled in a longitudinal study (6 month follow up) and completed the baseline battery of questionnaires on health (severity of symptoms), individual (self-esteem as a worker) and organizational factors (organizational constraints and supervisory support), and their work productivity (also measured at follow-up). Path analysis was used to test the hypothetical model, assessing individual and organizational factors in the context of social firms that could facilitate or hamper work productivity in the immediate term (T1), as well as the stability of work productivity in the middle/long term (T2 or 6 month follow up). RESULTS: Work productivity of people with a psychiatric disability was affected negatively by severity of the symptoms, organizational constraints, and positively by self- esteem as a worker at T1. The stability of work productivity was significant across time (T2). Supervisor support was only related to work productivity at 6 month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The results highlight the importance of the supportive workplaces for people with mental disorders that SFs provide, and the stability of work productivity across time. Supervisor support seems to have a delayed impact on work productivity. In future studies, researchers could determine how individual and organizational variables influence job tenure of employees with a psychiatric disability.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)151-160
Number of pages10
JournalWork
Volume62
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Psychiatry
Self Concept
Workplace
Mental Disorders
Longitudinal Studies
Theoretical Models
Research Personnel
Health

Keywords

  • Health
  • individual and organizational factors
  • job tenure
  • supervisor

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Corbiere, M., Zaniboni, S., Dewa, C. S., Villotti, P., Lecomte, T., Sultan-Taïeb, H., ... Fraccaroli, F. (2019). Work productivity of people with a psychiatric disability working in social firms. Work, 62(1), 151-160. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-182850

Work productivity of people with a psychiatric disability working in social firms. / Corbiere, Marc; Zaniboni, Sara; Dewa, Carolyn S; Villotti, Patrizia; Lecomte, Tania; Sultan-Taïeb, Hélène; Hupé, Julie; Fraccaroli, Franco.

In: Work, Vol. 62, No. 1, 01.01.2019, p. 151-160.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Corbiere, M, Zaniboni, S, Dewa, CS, Villotti, P, Lecomte, T, Sultan-Taïeb, H, Hupé, J & Fraccaroli, F 2019, 'Work productivity of people with a psychiatric disability working in social firms', Work, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 151-160. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-182850
Corbiere M, Zaniboni S, Dewa CS, Villotti P, Lecomte T, Sultan-Taïeb H et al. Work productivity of people with a psychiatric disability working in social firms. Work. 2019 Jan 1;62(1):151-160. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-182850
Corbiere, Marc ; Zaniboni, Sara ; Dewa, Carolyn S ; Villotti, Patrizia ; Lecomte, Tania ; Sultan-Taïeb, Hélène ; Hupé, Julie ; Fraccaroli, Franco. / Work productivity of people with a psychiatric disability working in social firms. In: Work. 2019 ; Vol. 62, No. 1. pp. 151-160.
@article{756cb0496a584384a8e05e5f209e92ff,
title = "Work productivity of people with a psychiatric disability working in social firms",
abstract = "Several factors impact work productivity in employees with a psychiatric condition. OBJECTIVE: In the context of social firms (SFs) the goal of this study is to test a theoretical model to predict work productivity across time, while considering worker and workplace factors. METHODS: 222 people with a psychiatric disability employed in SFs were enrolled in a longitudinal study (6 month follow up) and completed the baseline battery of questionnaires on health (severity of symptoms), individual (self-esteem as a worker) and organizational factors (organizational constraints and supervisory support), and their work productivity (also measured at follow-up). Path analysis was used to test the hypothetical model, assessing individual and organizational factors in the context of social firms that could facilitate or hamper work productivity in the immediate term (T1), as well as the stability of work productivity in the middle/long term (T2 or 6 month follow up). RESULTS: Work productivity of people with a psychiatric disability was affected negatively by severity of the symptoms, organizational constraints, and positively by self- esteem as a worker at T1. The stability of work productivity was significant across time (T2). Supervisor support was only related to work productivity at 6 month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The results highlight the importance of the supportive workplaces for people with mental disorders that SFs provide, and the stability of work productivity across time. Supervisor support seems to have a delayed impact on work productivity. In future studies, researchers could determine how individual and organizational variables influence job tenure of employees with a psychiatric disability.",
keywords = "Health, individual and organizational factors, job tenure, supervisor",
author = "Marc Corbiere and Sara Zaniboni and Dewa, {Carolyn S} and Patrizia Villotti and Tania Lecomte and H{\'e}l{\`e}ne Sultan-Ta{\"i}eb and Julie Hup{\'e} and Franco Fraccaroli",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3233/WOR-182850",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "62",
pages = "151--160",
journal = "Work",
issn = "1051-9815",
publisher = "IOS Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Work productivity of people with a psychiatric disability working in social firms

AU - Corbiere, Marc

AU - Zaniboni, Sara

AU - Dewa, Carolyn S

AU - Villotti, Patrizia

AU - Lecomte, Tania

AU - Sultan-Taïeb, Hélène

AU - Hupé, Julie

AU - Fraccaroli, Franco

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Several factors impact work productivity in employees with a psychiatric condition. OBJECTIVE: In the context of social firms (SFs) the goal of this study is to test a theoretical model to predict work productivity across time, while considering worker and workplace factors. METHODS: 222 people with a psychiatric disability employed in SFs were enrolled in a longitudinal study (6 month follow up) and completed the baseline battery of questionnaires on health (severity of symptoms), individual (self-esteem as a worker) and organizational factors (organizational constraints and supervisory support), and their work productivity (also measured at follow-up). Path analysis was used to test the hypothetical model, assessing individual and organizational factors in the context of social firms that could facilitate or hamper work productivity in the immediate term (T1), as well as the stability of work productivity in the middle/long term (T2 or 6 month follow up). RESULTS: Work productivity of people with a psychiatric disability was affected negatively by severity of the symptoms, organizational constraints, and positively by self- esteem as a worker at T1. The stability of work productivity was significant across time (T2). Supervisor support was only related to work productivity at 6 month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The results highlight the importance of the supportive workplaces for people with mental disorders that SFs provide, and the stability of work productivity across time. Supervisor support seems to have a delayed impact on work productivity. In future studies, researchers could determine how individual and organizational variables influence job tenure of employees with a psychiatric disability.

AB - Several factors impact work productivity in employees with a psychiatric condition. OBJECTIVE: In the context of social firms (SFs) the goal of this study is to test a theoretical model to predict work productivity across time, while considering worker and workplace factors. METHODS: 222 people with a psychiatric disability employed in SFs were enrolled in a longitudinal study (6 month follow up) and completed the baseline battery of questionnaires on health (severity of symptoms), individual (self-esteem as a worker) and organizational factors (organizational constraints and supervisory support), and their work productivity (also measured at follow-up). Path analysis was used to test the hypothetical model, assessing individual and organizational factors in the context of social firms that could facilitate or hamper work productivity in the immediate term (T1), as well as the stability of work productivity in the middle/long term (T2 or 6 month follow up). RESULTS: Work productivity of people with a psychiatric disability was affected negatively by severity of the symptoms, organizational constraints, and positively by self- esteem as a worker at T1. The stability of work productivity was significant across time (T2). Supervisor support was only related to work productivity at 6 month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The results highlight the importance of the supportive workplaces for people with mental disorders that SFs provide, and the stability of work productivity across time. Supervisor support seems to have a delayed impact on work productivity. In future studies, researchers could determine how individual and organizational variables influence job tenure of employees with a psychiatric disability.

KW - Health

KW - individual and organizational factors

KW - job tenure

KW - supervisor

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061235809&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061235809&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3233/WOR-182850

DO - 10.3233/WOR-182850

M3 - Article

C2 - 30689598

AN - SCOPUS:85061235809

VL - 62

SP - 151

EP - 160

JO - Work

JF - Work

SN - 1051-9815

IS - 1

ER -