Women's motivation to participate in contraceptive efficacy trials

Heather Hohmann, Lynn Reid, Mitchell D Creinin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: We sought to determine whether there are differences in subject's motivation to participate in hormonal and barrier method contraceptive efficacy studies. Study Design: All women presenting for screening appointments for either barrier or hormonal contraceptive efficacy trials were asked to complete a survey including demographic questions and questions which utilized Likert scales to grade the importance of potential motivating factors for research participation. Results: A total of 72 hormonal and 36 barrier method subjects completed the survey. More women in the barrier group cited an altruistic reason as their primary motivator for participation in comparison to the hormonal group (61.2% vs. 31.9%, respectively, p=.004). This difference continued to be statistically significant in multiple logistic regression controlling for demographic variables. The most common primary motivating factor cited by the barrier group was the belief that research is important (30.6%), whereas the most common reason cited by the hormonal group was the desire for free contraception (22.2%). Conclusion: Women enrolling in barrier method studies are more likely than women enrolling in hormonal studies to cite an altruistic reason for their participation in these trials.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)270-275
Number of pages6
JournalContraception
Volume80
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Contraceptive Agents
Barrier Contraception
Demography
Contraception
Research
Appointments and Schedules
Logistic Models

Keywords

  • Clinical trials
  • Contraception
  • Efficacy trials
  • Motivation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Women's motivation to participate in contraceptive efficacy trials. / Hohmann, Heather; Reid, Lynn; Creinin, Mitchell D.

In: Contraception, Vol. 80, No. 3, 09.2009, p. 270-275.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hohmann, Heather ; Reid, Lynn ; Creinin, Mitchell D. / Women's motivation to participate in contraceptive efficacy trials. In: Contraception. 2009 ; Vol. 80, No. 3. pp. 270-275.
@article{61c318ecedb845849346912ed8a5b541,
title = "Women's motivation to participate in contraceptive efficacy trials",
abstract = "Background: We sought to determine whether there are differences in subject's motivation to participate in hormonal and barrier method contraceptive efficacy studies. Study Design: All women presenting for screening appointments for either barrier or hormonal contraceptive efficacy trials were asked to complete a survey including demographic questions and questions which utilized Likert scales to grade the importance of potential motivating factors for research participation. Results: A total of 72 hormonal and 36 barrier method subjects completed the survey. More women in the barrier group cited an altruistic reason as their primary motivator for participation in comparison to the hormonal group (61.2{\%} vs. 31.9{\%}, respectively, p=.004). This difference continued to be statistically significant in multiple logistic regression controlling for demographic variables. The most common primary motivating factor cited by the barrier group was the belief that research is important (30.6{\%}), whereas the most common reason cited by the hormonal group was the desire for free contraception (22.2{\%}). Conclusion: Women enrolling in barrier method studies are more likely than women enrolling in hormonal studies to cite an altruistic reason for their participation in these trials.",
keywords = "Clinical trials, Contraception, Efficacy trials, Motivation",
author = "Heather Hohmann and Lynn Reid and Creinin, {Mitchell D}",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.contraception.2009.03.015",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "80",
pages = "270--275",
journal = "Contraception",
issn = "0010-7824",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Women's motivation to participate in contraceptive efficacy trials

AU - Hohmann, Heather

AU - Reid, Lynn

AU - Creinin, Mitchell D

PY - 2009/9

Y1 - 2009/9

N2 - Background: We sought to determine whether there are differences in subject's motivation to participate in hormonal and barrier method contraceptive efficacy studies. Study Design: All women presenting for screening appointments for either barrier or hormonal contraceptive efficacy trials were asked to complete a survey including demographic questions and questions which utilized Likert scales to grade the importance of potential motivating factors for research participation. Results: A total of 72 hormonal and 36 barrier method subjects completed the survey. More women in the barrier group cited an altruistic reason as their primary motivator for participation in comparison to the hormonal group (61.2% vs. 31.9%, respectively, p=.004). This difference continued to be statistically significant in multiple logistic regression controlling for demographic variables. The most common primary motivating factor cited by the barrier group was the belief that research is important (30.6%), whereas the most common reason cited by the hormonal group was the desire for free contraception (22.2%). Conclusion: Women enrolling in barrier method studies are more likely than women enrolling in hormonal studies to cite an altruistic reason for their participation in these trials.

AB - Background: We sought to determine whether there are differences in subject's motivation to participate in hormonal and barrier method contraceptive efficacy studies. Study Design: All women presenting for screening appointments for either barrier or hormonal contraceptive efficacy trials were asked to complete a survey including demographic questions and questions which utilized Likert scales to grade the importance of potential motivating factors for research participation. Results: A total of 72 hormonal and 36 barrier method subjects completed the survey. More women in the barrier group cited an altruistic reason as their primary motivator for participation in comparison to the hormonal group (61.2% vs. 31.9%, respectively, p=.004). This difference continued to be statistically significant in multiple logistic regression controlling for demographic variables. The most common primary motivating factor cited by the barrier group was the belief that research is important (30.6%), whereas the most common reason cited by the hormonal group was the desire for free contraception (22.2%). Conclusion: Women enrolling in barrier method studies are more likely than women enrolling in hormonal studies to cite an altruistic reason for their participation in these trials.

KW - Clinical trials

KW - Contraception

KW - Efficacy trials

KW - Motivation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=68749109324&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=68749109324&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.contraception.2009.03.015

DO - 10.1016/j.contraception.2009.03.015

M3 - Article

C2 - 19698820

AN - SCOPUS:68749109324

VL - 80

SP - 270

EP - 275

JO - Contraception

JF - Contraception

SN - 0010-7824

IS - 3

ER -