Where Are the Women? The Underrepresentation of Women Physicians Among Recognition Award Recipients From Medical Specialty Societies

Julie K. Silver, Chloe S. Slocum, Anna M. Bank, Saurabha Bhatnagar, Cheri A. Blauwet, Julie A. Poorman, Amparo C Villablanca, Sareh Parangi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Membership in medical societies is associated with a number of benefits to members that may include professional education, opportunities to present research, scientific and/or leadership training, networking, and others. In this perspective article, the authors address the value that medical specialty society membership and inclusion have in the development of an academic physician's career and how underrepresentation of women may pose barriers to their career advancement. Because society membership itself is not likely sufficient to support the advancement of academic physicians, this report focuses on one key component of advancement that also can be used as a measure of inclusion in society activities—the representation of women physicians among recipients of recognition awards. Previous reports demonstrated underrepresentation of women physicians among recognition award recipients from 2 physical medicine and rehabilitation specialty organizations, including examples of zero or near-zero results. This report investigated whether zero or near-zero representation of women physicians among recognition award recipients from medical specialty societies extended beyond the field of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Examples of the underrepresentation of women physicians, as compared with their presence in the respective field, was found across a range of additional specialties, including dermatology, neurology, anesthesiology, orthopedic surgery, head and neck surgery, and plastic surgery. The authors propose a call for action across the entire spectrum of medical specialty societies to: (1) examine gender diversity and inclusion data through the lens of the organization's mission, values, and culture; (2) transparently report the results to members and other stakeholders including medical schools and academic medical centers; (3) investigate potential causes of less than proportionate representation of women; (4) implement strategies designed to improve inclusion; (5) track outcomes as a means to measure progress and inform future strategies; and (6) publish the results to engage community members in conversation about the equitable representation of women.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)804-815
Number of pages12
JournalPM and R
Volume9
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2017

Fingerprint

Women Physicians
Medical Societies
Medicine
Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
Organizations
Physicians
Professional Education
Anesthesiology
Plastic Surgery
Neurology
Dermatology
Medical Schools
Lenses
Orthopedics
Neck
Head
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Rehabilitation
  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Silver, J. K., Slocum, C. S., Bank, A. M., Bhatnagar, S., Blauwet, C. A., Poorman, J. A., ... Parangi, S. (2017). Where Are the Women? The Underrepresentation of Women Physicians Among Recognition Award Recipients From Medical Specialty Societies. PM and R, 9(8), 804-815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2017.06.001

Where Are the Women? The Underrepresentation of Women Physicians Among Recognition Award Recipients From Medical Specialty Societies. / Silver, Julie K.; Slocum, Chloe S.; Bank, Anna M.; Bhatnagar, Saurabha; Blauwet, Cheri A.; Poorman, Julie A.; Villablanca, Amparo C; Parangi, Sareh.

In: PM and R, Vol. 9, No. 8, 01.08.2017, p. 804-815.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Silver, Julie K. ; Slocum, Chloe S. ; Bank, Anna M. ; Bhatnagar, Saurabha ; Blauwet, Cheri A. ; Poorman, Julie A. ; Villablanca, Amparo C ; Parangi, Sareh. / Where Are the Women? The Underrepresentation of Women Physicians Among Recognition Award Recipients From Medical Specialty Societies. In: PM and R. 2017 ; Vol. 9, No. 8. pp. 804-815.
@article{005b6aa9a6a8483ab15e098d1036433f,
title = "Where Are the Women? The Underrepresentation of Women Physicians Among Recognition Award Recipients From Medical Specialty Societies",
abstract = "Membership in medical societies is associated with a number of benefits to members that may include professional education, opportunities to present research, scientific and/or leadership training, networking, and others. In this perspective article, the authors address the value that medical specialty society membership and inclusion have in the development of an academic physician's career and how underrepresentation of women may pose barriers to their career advancement. Because society membership itself is not likely sufficient to support the advancement of academic physicians, this report focuses on one key component of advancement that also can be used as a measure of inclusion in society activities—the representation of women physicians among recipients of recognition awards. Previous reports demonstrated underrepresentation of women physicians among recognition award recipients from 2 physical medicine and rehabilitation specialty organizations, including examples of zero or near-zero results. This report investigated whether zero or near-zero representation of women physicians among recognition award recipients from medical specialty societies extended beyond the field of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Examples of the underrepresentation of women physicians, as compared with their presence in the respective field, was found across a range of additional specialties, including dermatology, neurology, anesthesiology, orthopedic surgery, head and neck surgery, and plastic surgery. The authors propose a call for action across the entire spectrum of medical specialty societies to: (1) examine gender diversity and inclusion data through the lens of the organization's mission, values, and culture; (2) transparently report the results to members and other stakeholders including medical schools and academic medical centers; (3) investigate potential causes of less than proportionate representation of women; (4) implement strategies designed to improve inclusion; (5) track outcomes as a means to measure progress and inform future strategies; and (6) publish the results to engage community members in conversation about the equitable representation of women.",
author = "Silver, {Julie K.} and Slocum, {Chloe S.} and Bank, {Anna M.} and Saurabha Bhatnagar and Blauwet, {Cheri A.} and Poorman, {Julie A.} and Villablanca, {Amparo C} and Sareh Parangi",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.pmrj.2017.06.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "804--815",
journal = "PM and R",
issn = "1934-1482",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Where Are the Women? The Underrepresentation of Women Physicians Among Recognition Award Recipients From Medical Specialty Societies

AU - Silver, Julie K.

AU - Slocum, Chloe S.

AU - Bank, Anna M.

AU - Bhatnagar, Saurabha

AU - Blauwet, Cheri A.

AU - Poorman, Julie A.

AU - Villablanca, Amparo C

AU - Parangi, Sareh

PY - 2017/8/1

Y1 - 2017/8/1

N2 - Membership in medical societies is associated with a number of benefits to members that may include professional education, opportunities to present research, scientific and/or leadership training, networking, and others. In this perspective article, the authors address the value that medical specialty society membership and inclusion have in the development of an academic physician's career and how underrepresentation of women may pose barriers to their career advancement. Because society membership itself is not likely sufficient to support the advancement of academic physicians, this report focuses on one key component of advancement that also can be used as a measure of inclusion in society activities—the representation of women physicians among recipients of recognition awards. Previous reports demonstrated underrepresentation of women physicians among recognition award recipients from 2 physical medicine and rehabilitation specialty organizations, including examples of zero or near-zero results. This report investigated whether zero or near-zero representation of women physicians among recognition award recipients from medical specialty societies extended beyond the field of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Examples of the underrepresentation of women physicians, as compared with their presence in the respective field, was found across a range of additional specialties, including dermatology, neurology, anesthesiology, orthopedic surgery, head and neck surgery, and plastic surgery. The authors propose a call for action across the entire spectrum of medical specialty societies to: (1) examine gender diversity and inclusion data through the lens of the organization's mission, values, and culture; (2) transparently report the results to members and other stakeholders including medical schools and academic medical centers; (3) investigate potential causes of less than proportionate representation of women; (4) implement strategies designed to improve inclusion; (5) track outcomes as a means to measure progress and inform future strategies; and (6) publish the results to engage community members in conversation about the equitable representation of women.

AB - Membership in medical societies is associated with a number of benefits to members that may include professional education, opportunities to present research, scientific and/or leadership training, networking, and others. In this perspective article, the authors address the value that medical specialty society membership and inclusion have in the development of an academic physician's career and how underrepresentation of women may pose barriers to their career advancement. Because society membership itself is not likely sufficient to support the advancement of academic physicians, this report focuses on one key component of advancement that also can be used as a measure of inclusion in society activities—the representation of women physicians among recipients of recognition awards. Previous reports demonstrated underrepresentation of women physicians among recognition award recipients from 2 physical medicine and rehabilitation specialty organizations, including examples of zero or near-zero results. This report investigated whether zero or near-zero representation of women physicians among recognition award recipients from medical specialty societies extended beyond the field of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Examples of the underrepresentation of women physicians, as compared with their presence in the respective field, was found across a range of additional specialties, including dermatology, neurology, anesthesiology, orthopedic surgery, head and neck surgery, and plastic surgery. The authors propose a call for action across the entire spectrum of medical specialty societies to: (1) examine gender diversity and inclusion data through the lens of the organization's mission, values, and culture; (2) transparently report the results to members and other stakeholders including medical schools and academic medical centers; (3) investigate potential causes of less than proportionate representation of women; (4) implement strategies designed to improve inclusion; (5) track outcomes as a means to measure progress and inform future strategies; and (6) publish the results to engage community members in conversation about the equitable representation of women.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024377143&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85024377143&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.pmrj.2017.06.001

DO - 10.1016/j.pmrj.2017.06.001

M3 - Article

C2 - 28606837

AN - SCOPUS:85024377143

VL - 9

SP - 804

EP - 815

JO - PM and R

JF - PM and R

SN - 1934-1482

IS - 8

ER -