When is enophthalmos "significant"?

Lily Koo Lin, Mark P. Hatton, Peter A D Rubin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: It is currently unknown how many measurable millimeters of enophthalmos may be noticeable to an observer. Identifying the amount of enophthalmos present may help to guide patients and clinicians in regard to surgical management of enophthalmos. METHODS: The Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary Oculoplastics imaging database was used to select 12 photographs of patients with unilateral enophthalmos whose measurements ranged between 1 mm and 8 mm for the study group and 12 photographs of patients who did not have enophthalmos as the control group. Observers were asked to review each of the photographs from both groups and to comment on whether the appearance was normal or abnormal. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference found when observers reviewed photographs from the control group and patients whose measurements ranged between 1 mm and 2 mm (87%, 83% respondents identifying patients as normal, respectively). Twenty-eight percent of observers found patients with 3 mm and 4 mm of enophthalmos as having a normal appearance (P < 0.001). Ninety-seven percent of observers commented that patients with measurements of 5 mm and 8 mm had an abnormal appearance (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with 2 mm and less of measurable enophthalmos had a normal appearance as frequently as those without enophthalmos. Nearly all patients with measurements of 5 mm and greater had abnormal appearances. The point at which enophthalmos becomes detectable lies between 3 mm and 4 mm.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)274-277
Number of pages4
JournalOphthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Volume22
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Enophthalmos
Control Groups
Ear
Databases

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Surgery

Cite this

When is enophthalmos "significant"? / Lin, Lily Koo; Hatton, Mark P.; Rubin, Peter A D.

In: Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Vol. 22, No. 4, 07.2006, p. 274-277.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lin, Lily Koo ; Hatton, Mark P. ; Rubin, Peter A D. / When is enophthalmos "significant"?. In: Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2006 ; Vol. 22, No. 4. pp. 274-277.
@article{9d53eb35dc0f48438ac104543751e4b3,
title = "When is enophthalmos {"}significant{"}?",
abstract = "PURPOSE: It is currently unknown how many measurable millimeters of enophthalmos may be noticeable to an observer. Identifying the amount of enophthalmos present may help to guide patients and clinicians in regard to surgical management of enophthalmos. METHODS: The Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary Oculoplastics imaging database was used to select 12 photographs of patients with unilateral enophthalmos whose measurements ranged between 1 mm and 8 mm for the study group and 12 photographs of patients who did not have enophthalmos as the control group. Observers were asked to review each of the photographs from both groups and to comment on whether the appearance was normal or abnormal. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference found when observers reviewed photographs from the control group and patients whose measurements ranged between 1 mm and 2 mm (87{\%}, 83{\%} respondents identifying patients as normal, respectively). Twenty-eight percent of observers found patients with 3 mm and 4 mm of enophthalmos as having a normal appearance (P < 0.001). Ninety-seven percent of observers commented that patients with measurements of 5 mm and 8 mm had an abnormal appearance (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with 2 mm and less of measurable enophthalmos had a normal appearance as frequently as those without enophthalmos. Nearly all patients with measurements of 5 mm and greater had abnormal appearances. The point at which enophthalmos becomes detectable lies between 3 mm and 4 mm.",
author = "Lin, {Lily Koo} and Hatton, {Mark P.} and Rubin, {Peter A D}",
year = "2006",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1097/01.iop.0000226865.22184.6a",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "274--277",
journal = "Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery",
issn = "0740-9303",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - When is enophthalmos "significant"?

AU - Lin, Lily Koo

AU - Hatton, Mark P.

AU - Rubin, Peter A D

PY - 2006/7

Y1 - 2006/7

N2 - PURPOSE: It is currently unknown how many measurable millimeters of enophthalmos may be noticeable to an observer. Identifying the amount of enophthalmos present may help to guide patients and clinicians in regard to surgical management of enophthalmos. METHODS: The Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary Oculoplastics imaging database was used to select 12 photographs of patients with unilateral enophthalmos whose measurements ranged between 1 mm and 8 mm for the study group and 12 photographs of patients who did not have enophthalmos as the control group. Observers were asked to review each of the photographs from both groups and to comment on whether the appearance was normal or abnormal. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference found when observers reviewed photographs from the control group and patients whose measurements ranged between 1 mm and 2 mm (87%, 83% respondents identifying patients as normal, respectively). Twenty-eight percent of observers found patients with 3 mm and 4 mm of enophthalmos as having a normal appearance (P < 0.001). Ninety-seven percent of observers commented that patients with measurements of 5 mm and 8 mm had an abnormal appearance (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with 2 mm and less of measurable enophthalmos had a normal appearance as frequently as those without enophthalmos. Nearly all patients with measurements of 5 mm and greater had abnormal appearances. The point at which enophthalmos becomes detectable lies between 3 mm and 4 mm.

AB - PURPOSE: It is currently unknown how many measurable millimeters of enophthalmos may be noticeable to an observer. Identifying the amount of enophthalmos present may help to guide patients and clinicians in regard to surgical management of enophthalmos. METHODS: The Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary Oculoplastics imaging database was used to select 12 photographs of patients with unilateral enophthalmos whose measurements ranged between 1 mm and 8 mm for the study group and 12 photographs of patients who did not have enophthalmos as the control group. Observers were asked to review each of the photographs from both groups and to comment on whether the appearance was normal or abnormal. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference found when observers reviewed photographs from the control group and patients whose measurements ranged between 1 mm and 2 mm (87%, 83% respondents identifying patients as normal, respectively). Twenty-eight percent of observers found patients with 3 mm and 4 mm of enophthalmos as having a normal appearance (P < 0.001). Ninety-seven percent of observers commented that patients with measurements of 5 mm and 8 mm had an abnormal appearance (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with 2 mm and less of measurable enophthalmos had a normal appearance as frequently as those without enophthalmos. Nearly all patients with measurements of 5 mm and greater had abnormal appearances. The point at which enophthalmos becomes detectable lies between 3 mm and 4 mm.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33747101715&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33747101715&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.iop.0000226865.22184.6a

DO - 10.1097/01.iop.0000226865.22184.6a

M3 - Article

C2 - 16855499

AN - SCOPUS:33747101715

VL - 22

SP - 274

EP - 277

JO - Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

JF - Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

SN - 0740-9303

IS - 4

ER -