What defines a distracting injury in cervical spine assessment?

David S. Heffernan, Carol R. Schermer, Stephen W. Lu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study defined five criteria for obtaining cervical spine radiographic investigations in blunt trauma patients. Distracting injury was given as the indication for more than 30% of all x-ray studies ordered. The hypothesis of this study was that upper and lower torso injuries would have different effects on clinical cervical spine assessment. Methods: This is a single-center, prospective, observational study of admitted, alert, adult blunt-trauma patients. All patients underwent cervical spine plain-film radiography. Data were collected on all injuries, physical examination findings, narcotic administration, and radiograph results. Patients with upper and lower torso injuries were compared in their ability complain of pain or midline tenderness relative to a cervical spine fracture. Results: In all, 406 patients participated. All patients received narcotic analgesics before examination. Forty patients (9.9%) had cervical spine fractures, of whom seven had a nontender neck examination. All seven patients with a non-tender cervical spine and a neck fracture had at least one upper torso injury. None of the 99 patients with injuries isolated to the lower torso and a nontender neck had a cervical spine fracture (p < 0.05). The frequency of cervical spine fracture among patients with cervical spine tenderness was 19.8% (n = 33). Conclusions: The National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study definition of a distracting injury may be narrowed. Upper torso injuries may be sufficiently painful to distract from a reliable cervical spine examination. Patients may detect spine tenderness in the presence of isolated painful lower torso injuries. Patients with spine tenderness warrant imaging.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1396-1399
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care
Volume59
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Spine
Torso
Wounds and Injuries
Radiography
Neck
Narcotics
Emergencies
Aptitude
Physical Examination
Observational Studies
X-Rays
Prospective Studies
Pain

Keywords

  • Blunt trauma
  • Cervical spine clearance
  • Cervical spine injury
  • Distracting injuries

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

What defines a distracting injury in cervical spine assessment? / Heffernan, David S.; Schermer, Carol R.; Lu, Stephen W.

In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care, Vol. 59, No. 6, 12.2005, p. 1396-1399.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Heffernan, David S. ; Schermer, Carol R. ; Lu, Stephen W. / What defines a distracting injury in cervical spine assessment?. In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care. 2005 ; Vol. 59, No. 6. pp. 1396-1399.
@article{500f6aaf30ed44c3bcdce8b0b714799a,
title = "What defines a distracting injury in cervical spine assessment?",
abstract = "Background: The National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study defined five criteria for obtaining cervical spine radiographic investigations in blunt trauma patients. Distracting injury was given as the indication for more than 30{\%} of all x-ray studies ordered. The hypothesis of this study was that upper and lower torso injuries would have different effects on clinical cervical spine assessment. Methods: This is a single-center, prospective, observational study of admitted, alert, adult blunt-trauma patients. All patients underwent cervical spine plain-film radiography. Data were collected on all injuries, physical examination findings, narcotic administration, and radiograph results. Patients with upper and lower torso injuries were compared in their ability complain of pain or midline tenderness relative to a cervical spine fracture. Results: In all, 406 patients participated. All patients received narcotic analgesics before examination. Forty patients (9.9{\%}) had cervical spine fractures, of whom seven had a nontender neck examination. All seven patients with a non-tender cervical spine and a neck fracture had at least one upper torso injury. None of the 99 patients with injuries isolated to the lower torso and a nontender neck had a cervical spine fracture (p < 0.05). The frequency of cervical spine fracture among patients with cervical spine tenderness was 19.8{\%} (n = 33). Conclusions: The National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study definition of a distracting injury may be narrowed. Upper torso injuries may be sufficiently painful to distract from a reliable cervical spine examination. Patients may detect spine tenderness in the presence of isolated painful lower torso injuries. Patients with spine tenderness warrant imaging.",
keywords = "Blunt trauma, Cervical spine clearance, Cervical spine injury, Distracting injuries",
author = "Heffernan, {David S.} and Schermer, {Carol R.} and Lu, {Stephen W.}",
year = "2005",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1097/01.ta.0000196006.26551.ce",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "59",
pages = "1396--1399",
journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
issn = "2163-0755",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What defines a distracting injury in cervical spine assessment?

AU - Heffernan, David S.

AU - Schermer, Carol R.

AU - Lu, Stephen W.

PY - 2005/12

Y1 - 2005/12

N2 - Background: The National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study defined five criteria for obtaining cervical spine radiographic investigations in blunt trauma patients. Distracting injury was given as the indication for more than 30% of all x-ray studies ordered. The hypothesis of this study was that upper and lower torso injuries would have different effects on clinical cervical spine assessment. Methods: This is a single-center, prospective, observational study of admitted, alert, adult blunt-trauma patients. All patients underwent cervical spine plain-film radiography. Data were collected on all injuries, physical examination findings, narcotic administration, and radiograph results. Patients with upper and lower torso injuries were compared in their ability complain of pain or midline tenderness relative to a cervical spine fracture. Results: In all, 406 patients participated. All patients received narcotic analgesics before examination. Forty patients (9.9%) had cervical spine fractures, of whom seven had a nontender neck examination. All seven patients with a non-tender cervical spine and a neck fracture had at least one upper torso injury. None of the 99 patients with injuries isolated to the lower torso and a nontender neck had a cervical spine fracture (p < 0.05). The frequency of cervical spine fracture among patients with cervical spine tenderness was 19.8% (n = 33). Conclusions: The National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study definition of a distracting injury may be narrowed. Upper torso injuries may be sufficiently painful to distract from a reliable cervical spine examination. Patients may detect spine tenderness in the presence of isolated painful lower torso injuries. Patients with spine tenderness warrant imaging.

AB - Background: The National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study defined five criteria for obtaining cervical spine radiographic investigations in blunt trauma patients. Distracting injury was given as the indication for more than 30% of all x-ray studies ordered. The hypothesis of this study was that upper and lower torso injuries would have different effects on clinical cervical spine assessment. Methods: This is a single-center, prospective, observational study of admitted, alert, adult blunt-trauma patients. All patients underwent cervical spine plain-film radiography. Data were collected on all injuries, physical examination findings, narcotic administration, and radiograph results. Patients with upper and lower torso injuries were compared in their ability complain of pain or midline tenderness relative to a cervical spine fracture. Results: In all, 406 patients participated. All patients received narcotic analgesics before examination. Forty patients (9.9%) had cervical spine fractures, of whom seven had a nontender neck examination. All seven patients with a non-tender cervical spine and a neck fracture had at least one upper torso injury. None of the 99 patients with injuries isolated to the lower torso and a nontender neck had a cervical spine fracture (p < 0.05). The frequency of cervical spine fracture among patients with cervical spine tenderness was 19.8% (n = 33). Conclusions: The National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study definition of a distracting injury may be narrowed. Upper torso injuries may be sufficiently painful to distract from a reliable cervical spine examination. Patients may detect spine tenderness in the presence of isolated painful lower torso injuries. Patients with spine tenderness warrant imaging.

KW - Blunt trauma

KW - Cervical spine clearance

KW - Cervical spine injury

KW - Distracting injuries

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646166741&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33646166741&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.ta.0000196006.26551.ce

DO - 10.1097/01.ta.0000196006.26551.ce

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33646166741

VL - 59

SP - 1396

EP - 1399

JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

SN - 2163-0755

IS - 6

ER -