What? Another form? The process of measuring and comparing service utilization in a community mental health program model

Carolyn S Dewa, Salinda Horgan, Marc Russell, Jane Keates

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) is one of the most widely studied of all community mental health treatment models, the process through which it produces outcomes is often treated as a 'black box'. There is limited understanding of the model's essential elements and studies seldom describe program implementation. As a result, though localities may be interested in developing an ACT team, information necessary for implementation of the model (e.g. costing, cost-effectiveness, ACT service utilization) is inadequate to help plan services. Part of this gap in the literature can be attributed to the fact that the vital pieces of information needed to produce the much needed estimates are generally the most arduous to gather; they require daily recording of activities and hence, the participation of already overburdened program staff. The purpose of this paper is to describe our experiences in developing a multi-program economic evaluation and costing study of ACT. In discussing the process that we followed, we hope to pass on useful information that will help produce effective and efficient mental health evaluations in the future. Our project offers an example of how the worlds of research and service delivery can collaborate to come to symbiotic resolutions. Together, we have been able to collect data that is not only valuable for program evaluation but beneficial for administrative purposes to define priority areas, staffing and service planning.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)239-247
Number of pages9
JournalEvaluation and Program Planning
Volume24
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Community Mental Health Services
mental health
Mental Health
utilization
Program Evaluation
Cost-Benefit Analysis
community
evaluation
Social Welfare
staffing
recording
measuring
programme
services
Community mental health
Service utilization
staff
economics
Research
cost

Keywords

  • Assertive community treatment
  • Community mental health
  • Data collection
  • Economic evaluation
  • Study implementation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Business and International Management
  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Strategy and Management
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

What? Another form? The process of measuring and comparing service utilization in a community mental health program model. / Dewa, Carolyn S; Horgan, Salinda; Russell, Marc; Keates, Jane.

In: Evaluation and Program Planning, Vol. 24, No. 3, 08.2001, p. 239-247.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{74717e89707e4f0280f4d29bc8cead42,
title = "What? Another form? The process of measuring and comparing service utilization in a community mental health program model",
abstract = "Although Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) is one of the most widely studied of all community mental health treatment models, the process through which it produces outcomes is often treated as a 'black box'. There is limited understanding of the model's essential elements and studies seldom describe program implementation. As a result, though localities may be interested in developing an ACT team, information necessary for implementation of the model (e.g. costing, cost-effectiveness, ACT service utilization) is inadequate to help plan services. Part of this gap in the literature can be attributed to the fact that the vital pieces of information needed to produce the much needed estimates are generally the most arduous to gather; they require daily recording of activities and hence, the participation of already overburdened program staff. The purpose of this paper is to describe our experiences in developing a multi-program economic evaluation and costing study of ACT. In discussing the process that we followed, we hope to pass on useful information that will help produce effective and efficient mental health evaluations in the future. Our project offers an example of how the worlds of research and service delivery can collaborate to come to symbiotic resolutions. Together, we have been able to collect data that is not only valuable for program evaluation but beneficial for administrative purposes to define priority areas, staffing and service planning.",
keywords = "Assertive community treatment, Community mental health, Data collection, Economic evaluation, Study implementation",
author = "Dewa, {Carolyn S} and Salinda Horgan and Marc Russell and Jane Keates",
year = "2001",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/S0149-7189(01)00023-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "239--247",
journal = "Evaluation and Program Planning",
issn = "0149-7189",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What? Another form? The process of measuring and comparing service utilization in a community mental health program model

AU - Dewa, Carolyn S

AU - Horgan, Salinda

AU - Russell, Marc

AU - Keates, Jane

PY - 2001/8

Y1 - 2001/8

N2 - Although Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) is one of the most widely studied of all community mental health treatment models, the process through which it produces outcomes is often treated as a 'black box'. There is limited understanding of the model's essential elements and studies seldom describe program implementation. As a result, though localities may be interested in developing an ACT team, information necessary for implementation of the model (e.g. costing, cost-effectiveness, ACT service utilization) is inadequate to help plan services. Part of this gap in the literature can be attributed to the fact that the vital pieces of information needed to produce the much needed estimates are generally the most arduous to gather; they require daily recording of activities and hence, the participation of already overburdened program staff. The purpose of this paper is to describe our experiences in developing a multi-program economic evaluation and costing study of ACT. In discussing the process that we followed, we hope to pass on useful information that will help produce effective and efficient mental health evaluations in the future. Our project offers an example of how the worlds of research and service delivery can collaborate to come to symbiotic resolutions. Together, we have been able to collect data that is not only valuable for program evaluation but beneficial for administrative purposes to define priority areas, staffing and service planning.

AB - Although Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) is one of the most widely studied of all community mental health treatment models, the process through which it produces outcomes is often treated as a 'black box'. There is limited understanding of the model's essential elements and studies seldom describe program implementation. As a result, though localities may be interested in developing an ACT team, information necessary for implementation of the model (e.g. costing, cost-effectiveness, ACT service utilization) is inadequate to help plan services. Part of this gap in the literature can be attributed to the fact that the vital pieces of information needed to produce the much needed estimates are generally the most arduous to gather; they require daily recording of activities and hence, the participation of already overburdened program staff. The purpose of this paper is to describe our experiences in developing a multi-program economic evaluation and costing study of ACT. In discussing the process that we followed, we hope to pass on useful information that will help produce effective and efficient mental health evaluations in the future. Our project offers an example of how the worlds of research and service delivery can collaborate to come to symbiotic resolutions. Together, we have been able to collect data that is not only valuable for program evaluation but beneficial for administrative purposes to define priority areas, staffing and service planning.

KW - Assertive community treatment

KW - Community mental health

KW - Data collection

KW - Economic evaluation

KW - Study implementation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0041379563&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0041379563&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0149-7189(01)00023-4

DO - 10.1016/S0149-7189(01)00023-4

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 239

EP - 247

JO - Evaluation and Program Planning

JF - Evaluation and Program Planning

SN - 0149-7189

IS - 3

ER -