Western Trauma Association Critical Decisions in Trauma: Management of the mangled extremity

Thomas M. Scalea, Joseph DuBose, Ernest E. Moore, Michael West, Frederick A. Moore, Robert McIntyre, Christine S Cocanour, James Davis, M. Gage Ochsner, David Feliciano

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

41 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The operative management of mangled extremities after trauma remains controversial. We have sought to develop an evidencebased algorithm to help guide practitioners when faced with these relatively infrequent but very challenging clinical dilemmas. METHODS: The Western Trauma Association Critical Decisions Committee queried the literature to identify high-quality managements that would help guide the care of mangled extremities. When good data were not available, the Committee relied on expert opinions, either from the literature or from our senior members. RESULTS: Virtually, all the scoring systems used to guide therapy have not been proven to be valid. Hemodynamically unstable patients who failed to respond to initial resuscitation should be taken to the operating room for exploration and vascular control. Those who are stable should undergo a stepwise vascular and neurologic evaluation process. A comprehensive evaluation of factors that may help predict the appropriateness of limb salvage should be done in the operating room. Patients who are not candidates for salvage should undergo primary amputation. Those who are should undergo attempts at limb salvage. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with mangled extremities remain a significant management challenge. This algorithm represents a guideline based on the best evidence available in the literature and expert opinion. It does not establish a standard of care. It should provide a framework for treating physicians and other healthcare professionals to guide therapy, considering individual patients' clinical status and institutional resources.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)86-93
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
Volume72
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2012

Fingerprint

Extremities
Limb Salvage
Wounds and Injuries
Expert Testimony
Operating Rooms
Blood Vessels
Standard of Care
Amputation
Resuscitation
Nervous System
Guidelines
Delivery of Health Care
Physicians
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Amputation
  • Mangled extremity
  • Trauma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Surgery
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Scalea, T. M., DuBose, J., Moore, E. E., West, M., Moore, F. A., McIntyre, R., ... Feliciano, D. (2012). Western Trauma Association Critical Decisions in Trauma: Management of the mangled extremity. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 72(1), 86-93. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e318241ed70

Western Trauma Association Critical Decisions in Trauma : Management of the mangled extremity. / Scalea, Thomas M.; DuBose, Joseph; Moore, Ernest E.; West, Michael; Moore, Frederick A.; McIntyre, Robert; Cocanour, Christine S; Davis, James; Ochsner, M. Gage; Feliciano, David.

In: Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Vol. 72, No. 1, 01.2012, p. 86-93.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Scalea, TM, DuBose, J, Moore, EE, West, M, Moore, FA, McIntyre, R, Cocanour, CS, Davis, J, Ochsner, MG & Feliciano, D 2012, 'Western Trauma Association Critical Decisions in Trauma: Management of the mangled extremity', Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 86-93. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e318241ed70
Scalea, Thomas M. ; DuBose, Joseph ; Moore, Ernest E. ; West, Michael ; Moore, Frederick A. ; McIntyre, Robert ; Cocanour, Christine S ; Davis, James ; Ochsner, M. Gage ; Feliciano, David. / Western Trauma Association Critical Decisions in Trauma : Management of the mangled extremity. In: Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2012 ; Vol. 72, No. 1. pp. 86-93.
@article{5b714676cea6432aa1b5da2136982138,
title = "Western Trauma Association Critical Decisions in Trauma: Management of the mangled extremity",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: The operative management of mangled extremities after trauma remains controversial. We have sought to develop an evidencebased algorithm to help guide practitioners when faced with these relatively infrequent but very challenging clinical dilemmas. METHODS: The Western Trauma Association Critical Decisions Committee queried the literature to identify high-quality managements that would help guide the care of mangled extremities. When good data were not available, the Committee relied on expert opinions, either from the literature or from our senior members. RESULTS: Virtually, all the scoring systems used to guide therapy have not been proven to be valid. Hemodynamically unstable patients who failed to respond to initial resuscitation should be taken to the operating room for exploration and vascular control. Those who are stable should undergo a stepwise vascular and neurologic evaluation process. A comprehensive evaluation of factors that may help predict the appropriateness of limb salvage should be done in the operating room. Patients who are not candidates for salvage should undergo primary amputation. Those who are should undergo attempts at limb salvage. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with mangled extremities remain a significant management challenge. This algorithm represents a guideline based on the best evidence available in the literature and expert opinion. It does not establish a standard of care. It should provide a framework for treating physicians and other healthcare professionals to guide therapy, considering individual patients' clinical status and institutional resources.",
keywords = "Amputation, Mangled extremity, Trauma",
author = "Scalea, {Thomas M.} and Joseph DuBose and Moore, {Ernest E.} and Michael West and Moore, {Frederick A.} and Robert McIntyre and Cocanour, {Christine S} and James Davis and Ochsner, {M. Gage} and David Feliciano",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1097/TA.0b013e318241ed70",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "72",
pages = "86--93",
journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
issn = "2163-0755",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Western Trauma Association Critical Decisions in Trauma

T2 - Management of the mangled extremity

AU - Scalea, Thomas M.

AU - DuBose, Joseph

AU - Moore, Ernest E.

AU - West, Michael

AU - Moore, Frederick A.

AU - McIntyre, Robert

AU - Cocanour, Christine S

AU - Davis, James

AU - Ochsner, M. Gage

AU - Feliciano, David

PY - 2012/1

Y1 - 2012/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: The operative management of mangled extremities after trauma remains controversial. We have sought to develop an evidencebased algorithm to help guide practitioners when faced with these relatively infrequent but very challenging clinical dilemmas. METHODS: The Western Trauma Association Critical Decisions Committee queried the literature to identify high-quality managements that would help guide the care of mangled extremities. When good data were not available, the Committee relied on expert opinions, either from the literature or from our senior members. RESULTS: Virtually, all the scoring systems used to guide therapy have not been proven to be valid. Hemodynamically unstable patients who failed to respond to initial resuscitation should be taken to the operating room for exploration and vascular control. Those who are stable should undergo a stepwise vascular and neurologic evaluation process. A comprehensive evaluation of factors that may help predict the appropriateness of limb salvage should be done in the operating room. Patients who are not candidates for salvage should undergo primary amputation. Those who are should undergo attempts at limb salvage. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with mangled extremities remain a significant management challenge. This algorithm represents a guideline based on the best evidence available in the literature and expert opinion. It does not establish a standard of care. It should provide a framework for treating physicians and other healthcare professionals to guide therapy, considering individual patients' clinical status and institutional resources.

AB - BACKGROUND: The operative management of mangled extremities after trauma remains controversial. We have sought to develop an evidencebased algorithm to help guide practitioners when faced with these relatively infrequent but very challenging clinical dilemmas. METHODS: The Western Trauma Association Critical Decisions Committee queried the literature to identify high-quality managements that would help guide the care of mangled extremities. When good data were not available, the Committee relied on expert opinions, either from the literature or from our senior members. RESULTS: Virtually, all the scoring systems used to guide therapy have not been proven to be valid. Hemodynamically unstable patients who failed to respond to initial resuscitation should be taken to the operating room for exploration and vascular control. Those who are stable should undergo a stepwise vascular and neurologic evaluation process. A comprehensive evaluation of factors that may help predict the appropriateness of limb salvage should be done in the operating room. Patients who are not candidates for salvage should undergo primary amputation. Those who are should undergo attempts at limb salvage. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with mangled extremities remain a significant management challenge. This algorithm represents a guideline based on the best evidence available in the literature and expert opinion. It does not establish a standard of care. It should provide a framework for treating physicians and other healthcare professionals to guide therapy, considering individual patients' clinical status and institutional resources.

KW - Amputation

KW - Mangled extremity

KW - Trauma

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84859647766&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84859647766&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/TA.0b013e318241ed70

DO - 10.1097/TA.0b013e318241ed70

M3 - Article

C2 - 22310120

AN - SCOPUS:84859647766

VL - 72

SP - 86

EP - 93

JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

SN - 2163-0755

IS - 1

ER -