Waterbirth

An integrative analysis of peer-reviewed literature

Elizabeth Nutter, Shaunette Meyer, Jennifer Shaw Battista, Amy Marowitz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Despite a growing body of evidence for waterbirth safety, a myriad of political and cultural issues result in limited use in US hospitals compared to other developed nations. The purpose of this article is to critically analyze the evidence on maternal and neonatal outcomes of waterbirth to help inform evidence-based clinical practice in the United States. Methods: A literature search was performed using electronic databases CINAHL, Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, and PsycINFO. Thirty-eight studies, including 2 randomized controlled trials and 36 observational studies, were reviewed. Studies were conducted in 11 countries, mostly outside the United States. More than 31,000 waterbirths were described. Results: Aggregate results suggest that waterbirth is associated with high levels of maternal satisfaction with pain relief and the experience of childbirth, and may increase the likelihood of an intact perineum. Waterbirth is associated with decreased incidence of episiotomy and severe perineal lacerations, and may contribute to reduced postpartum hemorrhage. Data indicate no difference in maternal or neonatal infection rates or nursery admissions after waterbirth. Neonatal mortality rates are low and similar after waterbirth and uncomplicated conventional birth. The calculated cord avulsion rate is 2.4 per 1000 waterbirths; it is unknown how this compares to conventional birth due to a lack of data that permits direct comparison. Discussion: The majority of waterbirth research to date is observational and descriptive; thus, reported outcomes do not demonstrate causal associations. However, existing evidence is reassuring. Case-controlled studies have included thousands of women who gave birth underwater without an apparent increase in maternal or neonatal morbidity or mortality. Potential risks associated with waterbirth for women and neonates appear minimal, and outcomes are comparable to those expected in any healthy childbearing population.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)286-319
Number of pages34
JournalJournal of Midwifery and Women's Health
Volume59
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Mothers
Parturition
Episiotomy
Postpartum Hemorrhage
Perineum
Mortality
Nurseries
Lacerations
Evidence-Based Practice
Infant Mortality
Developed Countries
PubMed
MEDLINE
Observational Studies
Randomized Controlled Trials
Newborn Infant
Databases
Morbidity
Safety
Pain

Keywords

  • Birth
  • Hydrotherapy
  • Integrative review
  • Labor
  • Natural childbirth
  • Water immersion
  • Waterbirth

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Maternity and Midwifery

Cite this

Waterbirth : An integrative analysis of peer-reviewed literature. / Nutter, Elizabeth; Meyer, Shaunette; Shaw Battista, Jennifer; Marowitz, Amy.

In: Journal of Midwifery and Women's Health, Vol. 59, No. 3, 01.01.2014, p. 286-319.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nutter, Elizabeth ; Meyer, Shaunette ; Shaw Battista, Jennifer ; Marowitz, Amy. / Waterbirth : An integrative analysis of peer-reviewed literature. In: Journal of Midwifery and Women's Health. 2014 ; Vol. 59, No. 3. pp. 286-319.
@article{9e596cfc32df413da691fb5933f27d80,
title = "Waterbirth: An integrative analysis of peer-reviewed literature",
abstract = "Introduction: Despite a growing body of evidence for waterbirth safety, a myriad of political and cultural issues result in limited use in US hospitals compared to other developed nations. The purpose of this article is to critically analyze the evidence on maternal and neonatal outcomes of waterbirth to help inform evidence-based clinical practice in the United States. Methods: A literature search was performed using electronic databases CINAHL, Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, and PsycINFO. Thirty-eight studies, including 2 randomized controlled trials and 36 observational studies, were reviewed. Studies were conducted in 11 countries, mostly outside the United States. More than 31,000 waterbirths were described. Results: Aggregate results suggest that waterbirth is associated with high levels of maternal satisfaction with pain relief and the experience of childbirth, and may increase the likelihood of an intact perineum. Waterbirth is associated with decreased incidence of episiotomy and severe perineal lacerations, and may contribute to reduced postpartum hemorrhage. Data indicate no difference in maternal or neonatal infection rates or nursery admissions after waterbirth. Neonatal mortality rates are low and similar after waterbirth and uncomplicated conventional birth. The calculated cord avulsion rate is 2.4 per 1000 waterbirths; it is unknown how this compares to conventional birth due to a lack of data that permits direct comparison. Discussion: The majority of waterbirth research to date is observational and descriptive; thus, reported outcomes do not demonstrate causal associations. However, existing evidence is reassuring. Case-controlled studies have included thousands of women who gave birth underwater without an apparent increase in maternal or neonatal morbidity or mortality. Potential risks associated with waterbirth for women and neonates appear minimal, and outcomes are comparable to those expected in any healthy childbearing population.",
keywords = "Birth, Hydrotherapy, Integrative review, Labor, Natural childbirth, Water immersion, Waterbirth",
author = "Elizabeth Nutter and Shaunette Meyer and {Shaw Battista}, Jennifer and Amy Marowitz",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jmwh.12194",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "59",
pages = "286--319",
journal = "Journal of Midwifery and Women's Health",
issn = "1526-9523",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Waterbirth

T2 - An integrative analysis of peer-reviewed literature

AU - Nutter, Elizabeth

AU - Meyer, Shaunette

AU - Shaw Battista, Jennifer

AU - Marowitz, Amy

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Introduction: Despite a growing body of evidence for waterbirth safety, a myriad of political and cultural issues result in limited use in US hospitals compared to other developed nations. The purpose of this article is to critically analyze the evidence on maternal and neonatal outcomes of waterbirth to help inform evidence-based clinical practice in the United States. Methods: A literature search was performed using electronic databases CINAHL, Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, and PsycINFO. Thirty-eight studies, including 2 randomized controlled trials and 36 observational studies, were reviewed. Studies were conducted in 11 countries, mostly outside the United States. More than 31,000 waterbirths were described. Results: Aggregate results suggest that waterbirth is associated with high levels of maternal satisfaction with pain relief and the experience of childbirth, and may increase the likelihood of an intact perineum. Waterbirth is associated with decreased incidence of episiotomy and severe perineal lacerations, and may contribute to reduced postpartum hemorrhage. Data indicate no difference in maternal or neonatal infection rates or nursery admissions after waterbirth. Neonatal mortality rates are low and similar after waterbirth and uncomplicated conventional birth. The calculated cord avulsion rate is 2.4 per 1000 waterbirths; it is unknown how this compares to conventional birth due to a lack of data that permits direct comparison. Discussion: The majority of waterbirth research to date is observational and descriptive; thus, reported outcomes do not demonstrate causal associations. However, existing evidence is reassuring. Case-controlled studies have included thousands of women who gave birth underwater without an apparent increase in maternal or neonatal morbidity or mortality. Potential risks associated with waterbirth for women and neonates appear minimal, and outcomes are comparable to those expected in any healthy childbearing population.

AB - Introduction: Despite a growing body of evidence for waterbirth safety, a myriad of political and cultural issues result in limited use in US hospitals compared to other developed nations. The purpose of this article is to critically analyze the evidence on maternal and neonatal outcomes of waterbirth to help inform evidence-based clinical practice in the United States. Methods: A literature search was performed using electronic databases CINAHL, Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, and PsycINFO. Thirty-eight studies, including 2 randomized controlled trials and 36 observational studies, were reviewed. Studies were conducted in 11 countries, mostly outside the United States. More than 31,000 waterbirths were described. Results: Aggregate results suggest that waterbirth is associated with high levels of maternal satisfaction with pain relief and the experience of childbirth, and may increase the likelihood of an intact perineum. Waterbirth is associated with decreased incidence of episiotomy and severe perineal lacerations, and may contribute to reduced postpartum hemorrhage. Data indicate no difference in maternal or neonatal infection rates or nursery admissions after waterbirth. Neonatal mortality rates are low and similar after waterbirth and uncomplicated conventional birth. The calculated cord avulsion rate is 2.4 per 1000 waterbirths; it is unknown how this compares to conventional birth due to a lack of data that permits direct comparison. Discussion: The majority of waterbirth research to date is observational and descriptive; thus, reported outcomes do not demonstrate causal associations. However, existing evidence is reassuring. Case-controlled studies have included thousands of women who gave birth underwater without an apparent increase in maternal or neonatal morbidity or mortality. Potential risks associated with waterbirth for women and neonates appear minimal, and outcomes are comparable to those expected in any healthy childbearing population.

KW - Birth

KW - Hydrotherapy

KW - Integrative review

KW - Labor

KW - Natural childbirth

KW - Water immersion

KW - Waterbirth

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84901191695&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84901191695&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jmwh.12194

DO - 10.1111/jmwh.12194

M3 - Article

VL - 59

SP - 286

EP - 319

JO - Journal of Midwifery and Women's Health

JF - Journal of Midwifery and Women's Health

SN - 1526-9523

IS - 3

ER -