Abstract
As the ethical debate about euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide (PAS) continues, one alternative that has been suggested is for the patient to voluntarily refuse all food and fluids (VRFF). The article describes the results of a study of hospice nurses' and social workers' attitudes towards VRFF and compares them with their attitudes towards PAS. In 2001, a questionnaire was posted to nurses and social workers who care for Oregon residents enrolled in hospice programmes to determine their attitudes towards PAS and VRFF. In general, hospice workers expressed support for patients who choose to hasten their death by VRFF; they were less supportive of PAS. The results from this study suggest that perceptions regarding VRFF are significantly different from those regarding PAS. These results may have important clinical implications for nurses and social workers involved in end-of-life care who encounter patients who wish to hasten their deaths.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Journal | International Journal of Palliative Nursing |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| State | Published - 2004 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Cite this
Voluntary refusal of food and fluids : attitudes of Oregon hospice nurses and social workers. / Harvath, Theresa A; Miller, Lois L.; Goy, Elizabeth; Jackson, Ann; Delorit, Molly; Ganzini, Linda.
In: International Journal of Palliative Nursing, Vol. 10, No. 5, 2004.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Voluntary refusal of food and fluids
T2 - attitudes of Oregon hospice nurses and social workers.
AU - Harvath, Theresa A
AU - Miller, Lois L.
AU - Goy, Elizabeth
AU - Jackson, Ann
AU - Delorit, Molly
AU - Ganzini, Linda
PY - 2004
Y1 - 2004
N2 - As the ethical debate about euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide (PAS) continues, one alternative that has been suggested is for the patient to voluntarily refuse all food and fluids (VRFF). The article describes the results of a study of hospice nurses' and social workers' attitudes towards VRFF and compares them with their attitudes towards PAS. In 2001, a questionnaire was posted to nurses and social workers who care for Oregon residents enrolled in hospice programmes to determine their attitudes towards PAS and VRFF. In general, hospice workers expressed support for patients who choose to hasten their death by VRFF; they were less supportive of PAS. The results from this study suggest that perceptions regarding VRFF are significantly different from those regarding PAS. These results may have important clinical implications for nurses and social workers involved in end-of-life care who encounter patients who wish to hasten their deaths.
AB - As the ethical debate about euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide (PAS) continues, one alternative that has been suggested is for the patient to voluntarily refuse all food and fluids (VRFF). The article describes the results of a study of hospice nurses' and social workers' attitudes towards VRFF and compares them with their attitudes towards PAS. In 2001, a questionnaire was posted to nurses and social workers who care for Oregon residents enrolled in hospice programmes to determine their attitudes towards PAS and VRFF. In general, hospice workers expressed support for patients who choose to hasten their death by VRFF; they were less supportive of PAS. The results from this study suggest that perceptions regarding VRFF are significantly different from those regarding PAS. These results may have important clinical implications for nurses and social workers involved in end-of-life care who encounter patients who wish to hasten their deaths.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=3543084478&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=3543084478&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 15215708
AN - SCOPUS:3543084478
VL - 10
JO - International Journal of Palliative Nursing
JF - International Journal of Palliative Nursing
SN - 1357-6321
IS - 5
ER -