Voluntary refusal of food and fluids: attitudes of Oregon hospice nurses and social workers.

Theresa A Harvath, Lois L. Miller, Elizabeth Goy, Ann Jackson, Molly Delorit, Linda Ganzini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As the ethical debate about euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide (PAS) continues, one alternative that has been suggested is for the patient to voluntarily refuse all food and fluids (VRFF). The article describes the results of a study of hospice nurses' and social workers' attitudes towards VRFF and compares them with their attitudes towards PAS. In 2001, a questionnaire was posted to nurses and social workers who care for Oregon residents enrolled in hospice programmes to determine their attitudes towards PAS and VRFF. In general, hospice workers expressed support for patients who choose to hasten their death by VRFF; they were less supportive of PAS. The results from this study suggest that perceptions regarding VRFF are significantly different from those regarding PAS. These results may have important clinical implications for nurses and social workers involved in end-of-life care who encounter patients who wish to hasten their deaths.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalInternational Journal of Palliative Nursing
Volume10
Issue number5
StatePublished - 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Assisted Suicide
Hospices
Nurses
Food
Hospice Care
Terminal Care
Euthanasia
Social Workers

Cite this

Voluntary refusal of food and fluids : attitudes of Oregon hospice nurses and social workers. / Harvath, Theresa A; Miller, Lois L.; Goy, Elizabeth; Jackson, Ann; Delorit, Molly; Ganzini, Linda.

In: International Journal of Palliative Nursing, Vol. 10, No. 5, 2004.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harvath, Theresa A ; Miller, Lois L. ; Goy, Elizabeth ; Jackson, Ann ; Delorit, Molly ; Ganzini, Linda. / Voluntary refusal of food and fluids : attitudes of Oregon hospice nurses and social workers. In: International Journal of Palliative Nursing. 2004 ; Vol. 10, No. 5.
@article{2c5d0f2fdaeb4247a7bf1775b2b1c4fe,
title = "Voluntary refusal of food and fluids: attitudes of Oregon hospice nurses and social workers.",
abstract = "As the ethical debate about euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide (PAS) continues, one alternative that has been suggested is for the patient to voluntarily refuse all food and fluids (VRFF). The article describes the results of a study of hospice nurses' and social workers' attitudes towards VRFF and compares them with their attitudes towards PAS. In 2001, a questionnaire was posted to nurses and social workers who care for Oregon residents enrolled in hospice programmes to determine their attitudes towards PAS and VRFF. In general, hospice workers expressed support for patients who choose to hasten their death by VRFF; they were less supportive of PAS. The results from this study suggest that perceptions regarding VRFF are significantly different from those regarding PAS. These results may have important clinical implications for nurses and social workers involved in end-of-life care who encounter patients who wish to hasten their deaths.",
author = "Harvath, {Theresa A} and Miller, {Lois L.} and Elizabeth Goy and Ann Jackson and Molly Delorit and Linda Ganzini",
year = "2004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
journal = "International Journal of Palliative Nursing",
issn = "1357-6321",
publisher = "MA Healthcare Ltd",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Voluntary refusal of food and fluids

T2 - attitudes of Oregon hospice nurses and social workers.

AU - Harvath, Theresa A

AU - Miller, Lois L.

AU - Goy, Elizabeth

AU - Jackson, Ann

AU - Delorit, Molly

AU - Ganzini, Linda

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - As the ethical debate about euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide (PAS) continues, one alternative that has been suggested is for the patient to voluntarily refuse all food and fluids (VRFF). The article describes the results of a study of hospice nurses' and social workers' attitudes towards VRFF and compares them with their attitudes towards PAS. In 2001, a questionnaire was posted to nurses and social workers who care for Oregon residents enrolled in hospice programmes to determine their attitudes towards PAS and VRFF. In general, hospice workers expressed support for patients who choose to hasten their death by VRFF; they were less supportive of PAS. The results from this study suggest that perceptions regarding VRFF are significantly different from those regarding PAS. These results may have important clinical implications for nurses and social workers involved in end-of-life care who encounter patients who wish to hasten their deaths.

AB - As the ethical debate about euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide (PAS) continues, one alternative that has been suggested is for the patient to voluntarily refuse all food and fluids (VRFF). The article describes the results of a study of hospice nurses' and social workers' attitudes towards VRFF and compares them with their attitudes towards PAS. In 2001, a questionnaire was posted to nurses and social workers who care for Oregon residents enrolled in hospice programmes to determine their attitudes towards PAS and VRFF. In general, hospice workers expressed support for patients who choose to hasten their death by VRFF; they were less supportive of PAS. The results from this study suggest that perceptions regarding VRFF are significantly different from those regarding PAS. These results may have important clinical implications for nurses and social workers involved in end-of-life care who encounter patients who wish to hasten their deaths.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=3543084478&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=3543084478&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 15215708

AN - SCOPUS:3543084478

VL - 10

JO - International Journal of Palliative Nursing

JF - International Journal of Palliative Nursing

SN - 1357-6321

IS - 5

ER -