Visual field quality control in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS)

John L Keltner, Chris A. Johnson, Kimberly E. Cello, Shannan E. Bandermann, Juanjuan Fan, Richard A. Levine, Michael A. Kass, Mae O. Gordon

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report the impact of visual field quality control (QC) procedures on the rates of visual field unreliability, test parameter errors, and visual field defects attributed to testing artifacts in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS). METHODS: OHTS technicians were certified for perimetry and were required to submit 2 sets of visual fields that met study criteria before testing study participants. The OHTS Visual Field Reading Center (VFRC) evaluated 46,777 visual fields completed by 1618 OHTS participants between February 1994 and December 2003. Visual field QC errors, rates of unreliability, and defects attributed to testing artifacts were assessed. The OHTS QC system addressed 3 areas of clinic performance: (1) test parameter errors, (2) patient data errors, and (3) shipment errors. A visual field was classified as unreliable if any of the reliability indices exceeded the 33% limit. Clinical sites were immediately contacted by the VFRC via fax, e-mail, and/or phone and instructed on how to prevent further testing errors on fields with defects attributed to testing artifacts. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: QC errors (test parameter errors) and unreliability rates. RESULTS: A total of 2.4% (1136/ 46,777) of the visual fields were unreliable and 0.23% (107/46,777) had incorrect test parameters. Visual field defects attributed to testing artifacts occurred in approximately 1% (483/46,777) of the visual fields. CONCLUSIONS: Prompt transmission of visual fields to the VFRC for ongoing and intensive QC monitoring and rapid feedback to technicians helps to reduce the frequency of unreliable visual fields and incorrect testing parameters. Visual field defects attributed to testing artifacts were infrequent in the OHTS.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)665-669
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Glaucoma
Volume16
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2007

Fingerprint

Ocular Hypertension
Visual Fields
Quality Control
Artifacts
Therapeutics
Reading
Visual Field Tests
Telefacsimile
Postal Service

Keywords

  • Kyphosis
  • Mesodermal dysplasia spectrum
  • MRI
  • Oculo-auriculovertebral spectrum
  • Progressive noninfectious anterior vertebral fusion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Keltner, J. L., Johnson, C. A., Cello, K. E., Bandermann, S. E., Fan, J., Levine, R. A., ... Gordon, M. O. (2007). Visual field quality control in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS). Journal of Glaucoma, 16(8), 665-669. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0b013e318057526d

Visual field quality control in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS). / Keltner, John L; Johnson, Chris A.; Cello, Kimberly E.; Bandermann, Shannan E.; Fan, Juanjuan; Levine, Richard A.; Kass, Michael A.; Gordon, Mae O.

In: Journal of Glaucoma, Vol. 16, No. 8, 12.2007, p. 665-669.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Keltner, JL, Johnson, CA, Cello, KE, Bandermann, SE, Fan, J, Levine, RA, Kass, MA & Gordon, MO 2007, 'Visual field quality control in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS)', Journal of Glaucoma, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 665-669. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0b013e318057526d
Keltner, John L ; Johnson, Chris A. ; Cello, Kimberly E. ; Bandermann, Shannan E. ; Fan, Juanjuan ; Levine, Richard A. ; Kass, Michael A. ; Gordon, Mae O. / Visual field quality control in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS). In: Journal of Glaucoma. 2007 ; Vol. 16, No. 8. pp. 665-669.
@article{b454a55812e64ca3afaf62c2e4f99910,
title = "Visual field quality control in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS)",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To report the impact of visual field quality control (QC) procedures on the rates of visual field unreliability, test parameter errors, and visual field defects attributed to testing artifacts in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS). METHODS: OHTS technicians were certified for perimetry and were required to submit 2 sets of visual fields that met study criteria before testing study participants. The OHTS Visual Field Reading Center (VFRC) evaluated 46,777 visual fields completed by 1618 OHTS participants between February 1994 and December 2003. Visual field QC errors, rates of unreliability, and defects attributed to testing artifacts were assessed. The OHTS QC system addressed 3 areas of clinic performance: (1) test parameter errors, (2) patient data errors, and (3) shipment errors. A visual field was classified as unreliable if any of the reliability indices exceeded the 33{\%} limit. Clinical sites were immediately contacted by the VFRC via fax, e-mail, and/or phone and instructed on how to prevent further testing errors on fields with defects attributed to testing artifacts. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: QC errors (test parameter errors) and unreliability rates. RESULTS: A total of 2.4{\%} (1136/ 46,777) of the visual fields were unreliable and 0.23{\%} (107/46,777) had incorrect test parameters. Visual field defects attributed to testing artifacts occurred in approximately 1{\%} (483/46,777) of the visual fields. CONCLUSIONS: Prompt transmission of visual fields to the VFRC for ongoing and intensive QC monitoring and rapid feedback to technicians helps to reduce the frequency of unreliable visual fields and incorrect testing parameters. Visual field defects attributed to testing artifacts were infrequent in the OHTS.",
keywords = "Kyphosis, Mesodermal dysplasia spectrum, MRI, Oculo-auriculovertebral spectrum, Progressive noninfectious anterior vertebral fusion",
author = "Keltner, {John L} and Johnson, {Chris A.} and Cello, {Kimberly E.} and Bandermann, {Shannan E.} and Juanjuan Fan and Levine, {Richard A.} and Kass, {Michael A.} and Gordon, {Mae O.}",
year = "2007",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1097/IJG.0b013e318057526d",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "665--669",
journal = "Journal of Glaucoma",
issn = "1057-0829",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Visual field quality control in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS)

AU - Keltner, John L

AU - Johnson, Chris A.

AU - Cello, Kimberly E.

AU - Bandermann, Shannan E.

AU - Fan, Juanjuan

AU - Levine, Richard A.

AU - Kass, Michael A.

AU - Gordon, Mae O.

PY - 2007/12

Y1 - 2007/12

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To report the impact of visual field quality control (QC) procedures on the rates of visual field unreliability, test parameter errors, and visual field defects attributed to testing artifacts in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS). METHODS: OHTS technicians were certified for perimetry and were required to submit 2 sets of visual fields that met study criteria before testing study participants. The OHTS Visual Field Reading Center (VFRC) evaluated 46,777 visual fields completed by 1618 OHTS participants between February 1994 and December 2003. Visual field QC errors, rates of unreliability, and defects attributed to testing artifacts were assessed. The OHTS QC system addressed 3 areas of clinic performance: (1) test parameter errors, (2) patient data errors, and (3) shipment errors. A visual field was classified as unreliable if any of the reliability indices exceeded the 33% limit. Clinical sites were immediately contacted by the VFRC via fax, e-mail, and/or phone and instructed on how to prevent further testing errors on fields with defects attributed to testing artifacts. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: QC errors (test parameter errors) and unreliability rates. RESULTS: A total of 2.4% (1136/ 46,777) of the visual fields were unreliable and 0.23% (107/46,777) had incorrect test parameters. Visual field defects attributed to testing artifacts occurred in approximately 1% (483/46,777) of the visual fields. CONCLUSIONS: Prompt transmission of visual fields to the VFRC for ongoing and intensive QC monitoring and rapid feedback to technicians helps to reduce the frequency of unreliable visual fields and incorrect testing parameters. Visual field defects attributed to testing artifacts were infrequent in the OHTS.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To report the impact of visual field quality control (QC) procedures on the rates of visual field unreliability, test parameter errors, and visual field defects attributed to testing artifacts in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS). METHODS: OHTS technicians were certified for perimetry and were required to submit 2 sets of visual fields that met study criteria before testing study participants. The OHTS Visual Field Reading Center (VFRC) evaluated 46,777 visual fields completed by 1618 OHTS participants between February 1994 and December 2003. Visual field QC errors, rates of unreliability, and defects attributed to testing artifacts were assessed. The OHTS QC system addressed 3 areas of clinic performance: (1) test parameter errors, (2) patient data errors, and (3) shipment errors. A visual field was classified as unreliable if any of the reliability indices exceeded the 33% limit. Clinical sites were immediately contacted by the VFRC via fax, e-mail, and/or phone and instructed on how to prevent further testing errors on fields with defects attributed to testing artifacts. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: QC errors (test parameter errors) and unreliability rates. RESULTS: A total of 2.4% (1136/ 46,777) of the visual fields were unreliable and 0.23% (107/46,777) had incorrect test parameters. Visual field defects attributed to testing artifacts occurred in approximately 1% (483/46,777) of the visual fields. CONCLUSIONS: Prompt transmission of visual fields to the VFRC for ongoing and intensive QC monitoring and rapid feedback to technicians helps to reduce the frequency of unreliable visual fields and incorrect testing parameters. Visual field defects attributed to testing artifacts were infrequent in the OHTS.

KW - Kyphosis

KW - Mesodermal dysplasia spectrum

KW - MRI

KW - Oculo-auriculovertebral spectrum

KW - Progressive noninfectious anterior vertebral fusion

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=37349020200&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=37349020200&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/IJG.0b013e318057526d

DO - 10.1097/IJG.0b013e318057526d

M3 - Review article

C2 - 18091452

AN - SCOPUS:37349020200

VL - 16

SP - 665

EP - 669

JO - Journal of Glaucoma

JF - Journal of Glaucoma

SN - 1057-0829

IS - 8

ER -