Abstract
The amplitudes of pattern-reversal VEPs in 25 healty volunteers were significantly higher from the dominant eye than the non-dominant eye in right eye dominant subjects. The difference was present over both hemispheres and over the midline. Handedness did not appear to influence the amplitude asymmetry. A similar trend was noted in left eye dominant subjects, but the difference was significant only at O2. The mean latency of the P100 peak was significantly shorter with stimulation of the dominant eye. These amplitude and latency disparities between dominant and non-dominant eyes provide electrophysiological evidence of lateralization in the nervous system.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 424-428 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology |
| Volume | 52 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1981 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Clinical Neurology
- Neuroscience(all)
Cite this
Visual evoked potentials and eye dominance. / Seyal, Masud; Sato, S.; White, B. G.; Porter, R. J.
In: Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, Vol. 52, No. 5, 1981, p. 424-428.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Visual evoked potentials and eye dominance
AU - Seyal, Masud
AU - Sato, S.
AU - White, B. G.
AU - Porter, R. J.
PY - 1981
Y1 - 1981
N2 - The amplitudes of pattern-reversal VEPs in 25 healty volunteers were significantly higher from the dominant eye than the non-dominant eye in right eye dominant subjects. The difference was present over both hemispheres and over the midline. Handedness did not appear to influence the amplitude asymmetry. A similar trend was noted in left eye dominant subjects, but the difference was significant only at O2. The mean latency of the P100 peak was significantly shorter with stimulation of the dominant eye. These amplitude and latency disparities between dominant and non-dominant eyes provide electrophysiological evidence of lateralization in the nervous system.
AB - The amplitudes of pattern-reversal VEPs in 25 healty volunteers were significantly higher from the dominant eye than the non-dominant eye in right eye dominant subjects. The difference was present over both hemispheres and over the midline. Handedness did not appear to influence the amplitude asymmetry. A similar trend was noted in left eye dominant subjects, but the difference was significant only at O2. The mean latency of the P100 peak was significantly shorter with stimulation of the dominant eye. These amplitude and latency disparities between dominant and non-dominant eyes provide electrophysiological evidence of lateralization in the nervous system.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0019816174&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0019816174&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0013-4694(81)90025-0
DO - 10.1016/0013-4694(81)90025-0
M3 - Article
C2 - 6171407
AN - SCOPUS:0019816174
VL - 52
SP - 424
EP - 428
JO - Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology
JF - Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology
SN - 0013-4694
IS - 5
ER -