Visual evoked potentials and eye dominance

Masud Seyal, S. Sato, B. G. White, R. J. Porter

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The amplitudes of pattern-reversal VEPs in 25 healty volunteers were significantly higher from the dominant eye than the non-dominant eye in right eye dominant subjects. The difference was present over both hemispheres and over the midline. Handedness did not appear to influence the amplitude asymmetry. A similar trend was noted in left eye dominant subjects, but the difference was significant only at O2. The mean latency of the P100 peak was significantly shorter with stimulation of the dominant eye. These amplitude and latency disparities between dominant and non-dominant eyes provide electrophysiological evidence of lateralization in the nervous system.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)424-428
Number of pages5
JournalElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology
Volume52
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 1981
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

ocular Dominance
Visual Evoked Potentials
Functional Laterality
Nervous System
Volunteers

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Visual evoked potentials and eye dominance. / Seyal, Masud; Sato, S.; White, B. G.; Porter, R. J.

In: Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, Vol. 52, No. 5, 1981, p. 424-428.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

Seyal, M, Sato, S, White, BG & Porter, RJ 1981, 'Visual evoked potentials and eye dominance', Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 424-428. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(81)90025-0
Seyal M, Sato S, White BG, Porter RJ. Visual evoked potentials and eye dominance. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 1981;52(5):424-428. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(81)90025-0
Seyal, Masud ; Sato, S. ; White, B. G. ; Porter, R. J. / Visual evoked potentials and eye dominance. In: Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 1981 ; Vol. 52, No. 5. pp. 424-428.
@article{7c8796691ec74172952d62e1986f28d2,
title = "Visual evoked potentials and eye dominance",
abstract = "The amplitudes of pattern-reversal VEPs in 25 healty volunteers were significantly higher from the dominant eye than the non-dominant eye in right eye dominant subjects. The difference was present over both hemispheres and over the midline. Handedness did not appear to influence the amplitude asymmetry. A similar trend was noted in left eye dominant subjects, but the difference was significant only at O2. The mean latency of the P100 peak was significantly shorter with stimulation of the dominant eye. These amplitude and latency disparities between dominant and non-dominant eyes provide electrophysiological evidence of lateralization in the nervous system.",
author = "Masud Seyal and S. Sato and White, {B. G.} and Porter, {R. J.}",
year = "1981",
doi = "10.1016/0013-4694(81)90025-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "52",
pages = "424--428",
journal = "Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology",
issn = "0013-4694",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Visual evoked potentials and eye dominance

AU - Seyal, Masud

AU - Sato, S.

AU - White, B. G.

AU - Porter, R. J.

PY - 1981

Y1 - 1981

N2 - The amplitudes of pattern-reversal VEPs in 25 healty volunteers were significantly higher from the dominant eye than the non-dominant eye in right eye dominant subjects. The difference was present over both hemispheres and over the midline. Handedness did not appear to influence the amplitude asymmetry. A similar trend was noted in left eye dominant subjects, but the difference was significant only at O2. The mean latency of the P100 peak was significantly shorter with stimulation of the dominant eye. These amplitude and latency disparities between dominant and non-dominant eyes provide electrophysiological evidence of lateralization in the nervous system.

AB - The amplitudes of pattern-reversal VEPs in 25 healty volunteers were significantly higher from the dominant eye than the non-dominant eye in right eye dominant subjects. The difference was present over both hemispheres and over the midline. Handedness did not appear to influence the amplitude asymmetry. A similar trend was noted in left eye dominant subjects, but the difference was significant only at O2. The mean latency of the P100 peak was significantly shorter with stimulation of the dominant eye. These amplitude and latency disparities between dominant and non-dominant eyes provide electrophysiological evidence of lateralization in the nervous system.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0019816174&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0019816174&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0013-4694(81)90025-0

DO - 10.1016/0013-4694(81)90025-0

M3 - Article

VL - 52

SP - 424

EP - 428

JO - Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology

JF - Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology

SN - 0013-4694

IS - 5

ER -

Access to Document