Vicious viruses and vigilant vaccines: Effects of linguistic agency assignment in health policy advocacy

Robert A Bell, Matthew S. McGlone, Marko Dragojevic

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Studying the effect of a fictitious policy editorial advocating mandatory vaccination of youth against human papillomavirus (HPV), the authors hypothesized that linguistic assignment of agency to HPV (e.g., "HPV preys on millions of people") would increase perceptions of its severity, relative to a comparable message that assigned agency to humans (e.g., "Millions of people contract HPV"). In addition, the authors predicted that HPV vaccines would be perceived as more effective when agency was assigned to vaccination (e.g., "Vaccination guards people") rather than to humans (e.g., "People guard themselves through vaccination"). University students (N = 361) were randomly assigned to read one of four versions of the editorial defined by a 2 ×2 (Threat Agency × Immunization Agency) factorial design and thereafter completed a questionnaire. When agency was assigned to the virus or the vaccine, HPV was perceived as a more severe threat, vaccination was perceived as more effective, and people were more in favor of mandatory HPV vaccination. The authors concluded that linguistic agency assignment bestows potency to the agent, thereby making threats more alarming and medical interventions seem more effective.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1178-1193
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Health Communication
Volume19
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 3 2014

Fingerprint

Vaccines
vaccination
Linguistics
Health Policy
Viruses
health policy
Health
Vaccination
Immunization
linguistics
Papillomavirus Vaccines
threat
Students
Editorial Policies
Contracts
questionnaire
student

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health(social science)
  • Library and Information Sciences
  • Communication
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Vicious viruses and vigilant vaccines : Effects of linguistic agency assignment in health policy advocacy. / Bell, Robert A; McGlone, Matthew S.; Dragojevic, Marko.

In: Journal of Health Communication, Vol. 19, No. 10, 03.10.2014, p. 1178-1193.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bell, Robert A ; McGlone, Matthew S. ; Dragojevic, Marko. / Vicious viruses and vigilant vaccines : Effects of linguistic agency assignment in health policy advocacy. In: Journal of Health Communication. 2014 ; Vol. 19, No. 10. pp. 1178-1193.
@article{21000f4568a54f9e8f7264ead5fbd6be,
title = "Vicious viruses and vigilant vaccines: Effects of linguistic agency assignment in health policy advocacy",
abstract = "Studying the effect of a fictitious policy editorial advocating mandatory vaccination of youth against human papillomavirus (HPV), the authors hypothesized that linguistic assignment of agency to HPV (e.g., {"}HPV preys on millions of people{"}) would increase perceptions of its severity, relative to a comparable message that assigned agency to humans (e.g., {"}Millions of people contract HPV{"}). In addition, the authors predicted that HPV vaccines would be perceived as more effective when agency was assigned to vaccination (e.g., {"}Vaccination guards people{"}) rather than to humans (e.g., {"}People guard themselves through vaccination{"}). University students (N = 361) were randomly assigned to read one of four versions of the editorial defined by a 2 ×2 (Threat Agency × Immunization Agency) factorial design and thereafter completed a questionnaire. When agency was assigned to the virus or the vaccine, HPV was perceived as a more severe threat, vaccination was perceived as more effective, and people were more in favor of mandatory HPV vaccination. The authors concluded that linguistic agency assignment bestows potency to the agent, thereby making threats more alarming and medical interventions seem more effective.",
author = "Bell, {Robert A} and McGlone, {Matthew S.} and Marko Dragojevic",
year = "2014",
month = "10",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/10810730.2013.811330",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "1178--1193",
journal = "Journal of Health Communication",
issn = "1081-0730",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Vicious viruses and vigilant vaccines

T2 - Effects of linguistic agency assignment in health policy advocacy

AU - Bell, Robert A

AU - McGlone, Matthew S.

AU - Dragojevic, Marko

PY - 2014/10/3

Y1 - 2014/10/3

N2 - Studying the effect of a fictitious policy editorial advocating mandatory vaccination of youth against human papillomavirus (HPV), the authors hypothesized that linguistic assignment of agency to HPV (e.g., "HPV preys on millions of people") would increase perceptions of its severity, relative to a comparable message that assigned agency to humans (e.g., "Millions of people contract HPV"). In addition, the authors predicted that HPV vaccines would be perceived as more effective when agency was assigned to vaccination (e.g., "Vaccination guards people") rather than to humans (e.g., "People guard themselves through vaccination"). University students (N = 361) were randomly assigned to read one of four versions of the editorial defined by a 2 ×2 (Threat Agency × Immunization Agency) factorial design and thereafter completed a questionnaire. When agency was assigned to the virus or the vaccine, HPV was perceived as a more severe threat, vaccination was perceived as more effective, and people were more in favor of mandatory HPV vaccination. The authors concluded that linguistic agency assignment bestows potency to the agent, thereby making threats more alarming and medical interventions seem more effective.

AB - Studying the effect of a fictitious policy editorial advocating mandatory vaccination of youth against human papillomavirus (HPV), the authors hypothesized that linguistic assignment of agency to HPV (e.g., "HPV preys on millions of people") would increase perceptions of its severity, relative to a comparable message that assigned agency to humans (e.g., "Millions of people contract HPV"). In addition, the authors predicted that HPV vaccines would be perceived as more effective when agency was assigned to vaccination (e.g., "Vaccination guards people") rather than to humans (e.g., "People guard themselves through vaccination"). University students (N = 361) were randomly assigned to read one of four versions of the editorial defined by a 2 ×2 (Threat Agency × Immunization Agency) factorial design and thereafter completed a questionnaire. When agency was assigned to the virus or the vaccine, HPV was perceived as a more severe threat, vaccination was perceived as more effective, and people were more in favor of mandatory HPV vaccination. The authors concluded that linguistic agency assignment bestows potency to the agent, thereby making threats more alarming and medical interventions seem more effective.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84916603210&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84916603210&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10810730.2013.811330

DO - 10.1080/10810730.2013.811330

M3 - Article

C2 - 24354913

AN - SCOPUS:84916603210

VL - 19

SP - 1178

EP - 1193

JO - Journal of Health Communication

JF - Journal of Health Communication

SN - 1081-0730

IS - 10

ER -