Variations in resource utilization among medical specialties and systems of care: Results from the medical outcomes study

Sheldon Greenfield, Eugene C. Nelson, Michael Zubkoff, Willard Manning, William Rogers, Richard L Kravitz, Adam Keller, Alvin R. Tarlov, John E. Ware

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

511 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. - To examine whether specialty and system of care exert independent effects on resource utilization. Study Design. - Cross-sectional analysis of just over 20 000 patients (≥18years of age) who visited providers' offices during 9-day periods in 1986. Patient- and physician-provided information was obtained by self-administered questionnaires. Setting. - Offices of 349 physicians practicing family medicine, internal medicine, endocrinology, and cardiology within health maintenance organizations, large multispecialty groups, and solo practices or small single-specialty group practices in three major US cities. Outcome Measures. - Indicators of the intensity of resource utilization were examined among four medical specialties (family practice, general internal medicine, cardiology, and endocrinology) and five systems of care (health maintenance organization, multispecialty group - fee-for-service, multispecialty group - prepaid; solo practice and single-specialty group - fee-for-service, and solo practice and single-specialty group - prepaid) before and after controlling for the mix of patients seen in these offices. The indicators of resource utilization were hospitalizations, annual office visits, prescription drugs, and common tests and procedures, with rates estimated on both a per-visit and per-year basis. Results. - Variation in patient mix was a major determinant of the large variations in resource use. However, increased utilization was also independently related to specialty (cardiology and endocrinology), fee-for-service payment plan, and solo and single-specialty group practice arrangements. After adjusting for patient mix, solo practice/single-specialty groups - fee-for-service had 41% more hospitalizations than health maintenance organizations. General internists had utilization rates somewhat greater than family physicians on some indicators. Conclusion. - Although variations in patient mix should be a major determinant of variations in resource use, the independent effects of specialty training, payment system, and practice organization on utilization rates need further explication. The 2- and 4-year outcomes now being analyzed will provide information critical to interpretation of the variations reported herein.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1624-1630
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the American Medical Association
Volume267
Issue number12
StatePublished - Mar 25 1992
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Fee-for-Service Plans
Private Practice
Medicine
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Group Practice
Health Maintenance Organizations
Endocrinology
Cardiology
Family Physicians
Internal Medicine
Hospitalization
Office Visits
Physicians' Offices
Prescription Drugs
Family Practice
Cross-Sectional Studies
Organizations
Physicians

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Variations in resource utilization among medical specialties and systems of care : Results from the medical outcomes study. / Greenfield, Sheldon; Nelson, Eugene C.; Zubkoff, Michael; Manning, Willard; Rogers, William; Kravitz, Richard L; Keller, Adam; Tarlov, Alvin R.; Ware, John E.

In: Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 267, No. 12, 25.03.1992, p. 1624-1630.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Greenfield, S, Nelson, EC, Zubkoff, M, Manning, W, Rogers, W, Kravitz, RL, Keller, A, Tarlov, AR & Ware, JE 1992, 'Variations in resource utilization among medical specialties and systems of care: Results from the medical outcomes study', Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 267, no. 12, pp. 1624-1630.
Greenfield, Sheldon ; Nelson, Eugene C. ; Zubkoff, Michael ; Manning, Willard ; Rogers, William ; Kravitz, Richard L ; Keller, Adam ; Tarlov, Alvin R. ; Ware, John E. / Variations in resource utilization among medical specialties and systems of care : Results from the medical outcomes study. In: Journal of the American Medical Association. 1992 ; Vol. 267, No. 12. pp. 1624-1630.
@article{72e5ee0ff3fb424a90083af4f6bd1c40,
title = "Variations in resource utilization among medical specialties and systems of care: Results from the medical outcomes study",
abstract = "Objective. - To examine whether specialty and system of care exert independent effects on resource utilization. Study Design. - Cross-sectional analysis of just over 20 000 patients (≥18years of age) who visited providers' offices during 9-day periods in 1986. Patient- and physician-provided information was obtained by self-administered questionnaires. Setting. - Offices of 349 physicians practicing family medicine, internal medicine, endocrinology, and cardiology within health maintenance organizations, large multispecialty groups, and solo practices or small single-specialty group practices in three major US cities. Outcome Measures. - Indicators of the intensity of resource utilization were examined among four medical specialties (family practice, general internal medicine, cardiology, and endocrinology) and five systems of care (health maintenance organization, multispecialty group - fee-for-service, multispecialty group - prepaid; solo practice and single-specialty group - fee-for-service, and solo practice and single-specialty group - prepaid) before and after controlling for the mix of patients seen in these offices. The indicators of resource utilization were hospitalizations, annual office visits, prescription drugs, and common tests and procedures, with rates estimated on both a per-visit and per-year basis. Results. - Variation in patient mix was a major determinant of the large variations in resource use. However, increased utilization was also independently related to specialty (cardiology and endocrinology), fee-for-service payment plan, and solo and single-specialty group practice arrangements. After adjusting for patient mix, solo practice/single-specialty groups - fee-for-service had 41{\%} more hospitalizations than health maintenance organizations. General internists had utilization rates somewhat greater than family physicians on some indicators. Conclusion. - Although variations in patient mix should be a major determinant of variations in resource use, the independent effects of specialty training, payment system, and practice organization on utilization rates need further explication. The 2- and 4-year outcomes now being analyzed will provide information critical to interpretation of the variations reported herein.",
author = "Sheldon Greenfield and Nelson, {Eugene C.} and Michael Zubkoff and Willard Manning and William Rogers and Kravitz, {Richard L} and Adam Keller and Tarlov, {Alvin R.} and Ware, {John E.}",
year = "1992",
month = "3",
day = "25",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "267",
pages = "1624--1630",
journal = "JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association",
issn = "0002-9955",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Variations in resource utilization among medical specialties and systems of care

T2 - Results from the medical outcomes study

AU - Greenfield, Sheldon

AU - Nelson, Eugene C.

AU - Zubkoff, Michael

AU - Manning, Willard

AU - Rogers, William

AU - Kravitz, Richard L

AU - Keller, Adam

AU - Tarlov, Alvin R.

AU - Ware, John E.

PY - 1992/3/25

Y1 - 1992/3/25

N2 - Objective. - To examine whether specialty and system of care exert independent effects on resource utilization. Study Design. - Cross-sectional analysis of just over 20 000 patients (≥18years of age) who visited providers' offices during 9-day periods in 1986. Patient- and physician-provided information was obtained by self-administered questionnaires. Setting. - Offices of 349 physicians practicing family medicine, internal medicine, endocrinology, and cardiology within health maintenance organizations, large multispecialty groups, and solo practices or small single-specialty group practices in three major US cities. Outcome Measures. - Indicators of the intensity of resource utilization were examined among four medical specialties (family practice, general internal medicine, cardiology, and endocrinology) and five systems of care (health maintenance organization, multispecialty group - fee-for-service, multispecialty group - prepaid; solo practice and single-specialty group - fee-for-service, and solo practice and single-specialty group - prepaid) before and after controlling for the mix of patients seen in these offices. The indicators of resource utilization were hospitalizations, annual office visits, prescription drugs, and common tests and procedures, with rates estimated on both a per-visit and per-year basis. Results. - Variation in patient mix was a major determinant of the large variations in resource use. However, increased utilization was also independently related to specialty (cardiology and endocrinology), fee-for-service payment plan, and solo and single-specialty group practice arrangements. After adjusting for patient mix, solo practice/single-specialty groups - fee-for-service had 41% more hospitalizations than health maintenance organizations. General internists had utilization rates somewhat greater than family physicians on some indicators. Conclusion. - Although variations in patient mix should be a major determinant of variations in resource use, the independent effects of specialty training, payment system, and practice organization on utilization rates need further explication. The 2- and 4-year outcomes now being analyzed will provide information critical to interpretation of the variations reported herein.

AB - Objective. - To examine whether specialty and system of care exert independent effects on resource utilization. Study Design. - Cross-sectional analysis of just over 20 000 patients (≥18years of age) who visited providers' offices during 9-day periods in 1986. Patient- and physician-provided information was obtained by self-administered questionnaires. Setting. - Offices of 349 physicians practicing family medicine, internal medicine, endocrinology, and cardiology within health maintenance organizations, large multispecialty groups, and solo practices or small single-specialty group practices in three major US cities. Outcome Measures. - Indicators of the intensity of resource utilization were examined among four medical specialties (family practice, general internal medicine, cardiology, and endocrinology) and five systems of care (health maintenance organization, multispecialty group - fee-for-service, multispecialty group - prepaid; solo practice and single-specialty group - fee-for-service, and solo practice and single-specialty group - prepaid) before and after controlling for the mix of patients seen in these offices. The indicators of resource utilization were hospitalizations, annual office visits, prescription drugs, and common tests and procedures, with rates estimated on both a per-visit and per-year basis. Results. - Variation in patient mix was a major determinant of the large variations in resource use. However, increased utilization was also independently related to specialty (cardiology and endocrinology), fee-for-service payment plan, and solo and single-specialty group practice arrangements. After adjusting for patient mix, solo practice/single-specialty groups - fee-for-service had 41% more hospitalizations than health maintenance organizations. General internists had utilization rates somewhat greater than family physicians on some indicators. Conclusion. - Although variations in patient mix should be a major determinant of variations in resource use, the independent effects of specialty training, payment system, and practice organization on utilization rates need further explication. The 2- and 4-year outcomes now being analyzed will provide information critical to interpretation of the variations reported herein.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026553430&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026553430&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 1542172

AN - SCOPUS:0026553430

VL - 267

SP - 1624

EP - 1630

JO - JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association

JF - JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association

SN - 0002-9955

IS - 12

ER -