Variation in the rates of do not resuscitate orders after major trauma and the impact of intensive care unit environment

Avery B. Nathens, Frederick P. Rivara, Jin Wang, Ellen J. Mackenzie, Gregory Jurkovich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

47 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is an increased emphasis on benchmarking of trauma mortality outcomes as a measure of quality. Differences in approaches to end-of-life care or perceptions of salvageability might account for some of the variability in outcomes across centers. We postulated that these differences in perceptions or practice might lead to significant variation in the use of do not resuscitate (DNR) orders and sought to identify institutional characteristics associated with their use. METHODS: Patients surviving >24 hours and admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) in one of 68 centers across the United States were identified from a large prospective cohort study of severely injured patients. Independent predictors of a DNR order at both the patient and institutional level were identified using multivariate hierarchical modeling stratified by age <55 or ≥55. RESULTS: Of 6,765 patients, 7% had a DNR order, of whom 88% died. The proportion of patients in each center with a DNR order ranged from 0% to 57%. Independent patient-level predictors associated with a DNR order were increasing age, preinjury comorbidity burden, severe injury, and organ failure. Institutional predictors of DNR orders differed by age. Care in an open ICU was associated with a DNR order (odds ratio, 1.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-3.0) in the elderly, whereas care in a combined medical-surgical ICU (vs. surgical or trauma ICU) was associated with greater likelihood (odds ratio, 2.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-4.1) of a DNR order in the young. CONCLUSIONS: DNR orders are relatively common in seriously injured trauma patients, and there is significant variability in their use across centers. Given the institutional characteristics independently associated with DNR status, it is likely that both differences in the ethos of end-of-life care and perceptions of salvageability affect decision making.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)81-88
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care
Volume64
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Resuscitation Orders
Intensive Care Units
Wounds and Injuries
Terminal Care
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Benchmarking
Critical Care
Comorbidity
Decision Making
Cohort Studies
Prospective Studies

Keywords

  • Do not resuscitate
  • End of life
  • Futility
  • Withdrawal of care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Variation in the rates of do not resuscitate orders after major trauma and the impact of intensive care unit environment. / Nathens, Avery B.; Rivara, Frederick P.; Wang, Jin; Mackenzie, Ellen J.; Jurkovich, Gregory.

In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care, Vol. 64, No. 1, 01.01.2008, p. 81-88.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7124c96259b34fae99fe43ea2a6bad0f,
title = "Variation in the rates of do not resuscitate orders after major trauma and the impact of intensive care unit environment",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: There is an increased emphasis on benchmarking of trauma mortality outcomes as a measure of quality. Differences in approaches to end-of-life care or perceptions of salvageability might account for some of the variability in outcomes across centers. We postulated that these differences in perceptions or practice might lead to significant variation in the use of do not resuscitate (DNR) orders and sought to identify institutional characteristics associated with their use. METHODS: Patients surviving >24 hours and admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) in one of 68 centers across the United States were identified from a large prospective cohort study of severely injured patients. Independent predictors of a DNR order at both the patient and institutional level were identified using multivariate hierarchical modeling stratified by age <55 or ≥55. RESULTS: Of 6,765 patients, 7{\%} had a DNR order, of whom 88{\%} died. The proportion of patients in each center with a DNR order ranged from 0{\%} to 57{\%}. Independent patient-level predictors associated with a DNR order were increasing age, preinjury comorbidity burden, severe injury, and organ failure. Institutional predictors of DNR orders differed by age. Care in an open ICU was associated with a DNR order (odds ratio, 1.7; 95{\%} confidence interval, 1.0-3.0) in the elderly, whereas care in a combined medical-surgical ICU (vs. surgical or trauma ICU) was associated with greater likelihood (odds ratio, 2.0; 95{\%} confidence interval, 1.1-4.1) of a DNR order in the young. CONCLUSIONS: DNR orders are relatively common in seriously injured trauma patients, and there is significant variability in their use across centers. Given the institutional characteristics independently associated with DNR status, it is likely that both differences in the ethos of end-of-life care and perceptions of salvageability affect decision making.",
keywords = "Do not resuscitate, End of life, Futility, Withdrawal of care",
author = "Nathens, {Avery B.} and Rivara, {Frederick P.} and Jin Wang and Mackenzie, {Ellen J.} and Gregory Jurkovich",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/TA.0b013e31815dd4d7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "64",
pages = "81--88",
journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
issn = "2163-0755",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Variation in the rates of do not resuscitate orders after major trauma and the impact of intensive care unit environment

AU - Nathens, Avery B.

AU - Rivara, Frederick P.

AU - Wang, Jin

AU - Mackenzie, Ellen J.

AU - Jurkovich, Gregory

PY - 2008/1/1

Y1 - 2008/1/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: There is an increased emphasis on benchmarking of trauma mortality outcomes as a measure of quality. Differences in approaches to end-of-life care or perceptions of salvageability might account for some of the variability in outcomes across centers. We postulated that these differences in perceptions or practice might lead to significant variation in the use of do not resuscitate (DNR) orders and sought to identify institutional characteristics associated with their use. METHODS: Patients surviving >24 hours and admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) in one of 68 centers across the United States were identified from a large prospective cohort study of severely injured patients. Independent predictors of a DNR order at both the patient and institutional level were identified using multivariate hierarchical modeling stratified by age <55 or ≥55. RESULTS: Of 6,765 patients, 7% had a DNR order, of whom 88% died. The proportion of patients in each center with a DNR order ranged from 0% to 57%. Independent patient-level predictors associated with a DNR order were increasing age, preinjury comorbidity burden, severe injury, and organ failure. Institutional predictors of DNR orders differed by age. Care in an open ICU was associated with a DNR order (odds ratio, 1.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-3.0) in the elderly, whereas care in a combined medical-surgical ICU (vs. surgical or trauma ICU) was associated with greater likelihood (odds ratio, 2.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-4.1) of a DNR order in the young. CONCLUSIONS: DNR orders are relatively common in seriously injured trauma patients, and there is significant variability in their use across centers. Given the institutional characteristics independently associated with DNR status, it is likely that both differences in the ethos of end-of-life care and perceptions of salvageability affect decision making.

AB - BACKGROUND: There is an increased emphasis on benchmarking of trauma mortality outcomes as a measure of quality. Differences in approaches to end-of-life care or perceptions of salvageability might account for some of the variability in outcomes across centers. We postulated that these differences in perceptions or practice might lead to significant variation in the use of do not resuscitate (DNR) orders and sought to identify institutional characteristics associated with their use. METHODS: Patients surviving >24 hours and admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) in one of 68 centers across the United States were identified from a large prospective cohort study of severely injured patients. Independent predictors of a DNR order at both the patient and institutional level were identified using multivariate hierarchical modeling stratified by age <55 or ≥55. RESULTS: Of 6,765 patients, 7% had a DNR order, of whom 88% died. The proportion of patients in each center with a DNR order ranged from 0% to 57%. Independent patient-level predictors associated with a DNR order were increasing age, preinjury comorbidity burden, severe injury, and organ failure. Institutional predictors of DNR orders differed by age. Care in an open ICU was associated with a DNR order (odds ratio, 1.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-3.0) in the elderly, whereas care in a combined medical-surgical ICU (vs. surgical or trauma ICU) was associated with greater likelihood (odds ratio, 2.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-4.1) of a DNR order in the young. CONCLUSIONS: DNR orders are relatively common in seriously injured trauma patients, and there is significant variability in their use across centers. Given the institutional characteristics independently associated with DNR status, it is likely that both differences in the ethos of end-of-life care and perceptions of salvageability affect decision making.

KW - Do not resuscitate

KW - End of life

KW - Futility

KW - Withdrawal of care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38149043451&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38149043451&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/TA.0b013e31815dd4d7

DO - 10.1097/TA.0b013e31815dd4d7

M3 - Article

C2 - 18188103

AN - SCOPUS:38149043451

VL - 64

SP - 81

EP - 88

JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

SN - 2163-0755

IS - 1

ER -