Values and options in cancer care (VOICE)

Study design and rationale for a patient-centered communication and decision-making intervention for physicians, patients with advanced cancer, and their caregivers

Michael Hoerger, Ronald M. Epstein, Paul C. Winters, Kevin Fiscella, Paul R. Duberstein, Robert Gramling, Phyllis N. Butow, Supriya G. Mohile, Paul Kaesberg, Wan Tang, Sandy Plumb, Adam Walczak, Anthony L. Back, Daniel J Tancredi, Alison Venuti, Camille Cipri, Gisela Escalera, Carol Ferro, Don Gaudion, Beth Hoh & 5 others Blair Leatherwood, Linda Lewis, Mark Robinson, Peter Sullivan, Richard L Kravitz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

72 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Communication about prognosis and treatment choices is essential for informed decision making in advanced cancer. This article describes an investigation designed to facilitate communication and decision making among oncologists, patients with advanced cancer, and their caregivers.Methods/design: The Values and Options in Cancer Care (VOICE) Study is a National Cancer Institute sponsored randomized controlled trial conducted in the Rochester/Buffalo, NY and Sacramento, CA regions. A total of 40 oncologists, approximately 400 patients with advanced cancer, and their family/friend caregivers (one per patient, when available) are expected to enroll in the study. Drawing upon ecological theory, the intervention uses a two-pronged approach: oncologists complete a multifaceted tailored educational intervention involving standardized patient instructors (SPIs), and patients and caregivers complete a coaching intervention to facilitate prioritizing and discussing questions and concerns. Follow-up data will be collected approximately quarterly for up to three years.Discussion: The intervention is hypothesized to enhance patient-centered communication, quality of care, and patient outcomes. Analyses will examine the effects of the intervention on key elements of physician-patient-caregiver communication (primary outcomes), the physician-patient relationship, shared understanding of prognosis, patient well-being, and health service utilization (secondary outcomes).Trial registration: Clinical Trials Identifier: NCT01485627.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number188
JournalBMC Cancer
Volume13
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 9 2013

Fingerprint

Caregivers
Decision Making
Communication
Physicians
Neoplasms
Physician-Patient Relations
National Cancer Institute (U.S.)
Quality of Health Care
Buffaloes
Health Services
Randomized Controlled Trials
Clinical Trials
Oncologists

Keywords

  • Cancer
  • Caregivers
  • Communication
  • Decision making
  • End-of-life care
  • Palliative care
  • Patient-centered care
  • Physician-patient relations
  • Quality of life
  • Utilization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research
  • Genetics

Cite this

Values and options in cancer care (VOICE) : Study design and rationale for a patient-centered communication and decision-making intervention for physicians, patients with advanced cancer, and their caregivers. / Hoerger, Michael; Epstein, Ronald M.; Winters, Paul C.; Fiscella, Kevin; Duberstein, Paul R.; Gramling, Robert; Butow, Phyllis N.; Mohile, Supriya G.; Kaesberg, Paul; Tang, Wan; Plumb, Sandy; Walczak, Adam; Back, Anthony L.; Tancredi, Daniel J; Venuti, Alison; Cipri, Camille; Escalera, Gisela; Ferro, Carol; Gaudion, Don; Hoh, Beth; Leatherwood, Blair; Lewis, Linda; Robinson, Mark; Sullivan, Peter; Kravitz, Richard L.

In: BMC Cancer, Vol. 13, 188, 09.04.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hoerger, M, Epstein, RM, Winters, PC, Fiscella, K, Duberstein, PR, Gramling, R, Butow, PN, Mohile, SG, Kaesberg, P, Tang, W, Plumb, S, Walczak, A, Back, AL, Tancredi, DJ, Venuti, A, Cipri, C, Escalera, G, Ferro, C, Gaudion, D, Hoh, B, Leatherwood, B, Lewis, L, Robinson, M, Sullivan, P & Kravitz, RL 2013, 'Values and options in cancer care (VOICE): Study design and rationale for a patient-centered communication and decision-making intervention for physicians, patients with advanced cancer, and their caregivers', BMC Cancer, vol. 13, 188. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-13-188
Hoerger, Michael ; Epstein, Ronald M. ; Winters, Paul C. ; Fiscella, Kevin ; Duberstein, Paul R. ; Gramling, Robert ; Butow, Phyllis N. ; Mohile, Supriya G. ; Kaesberg, Paul ; Tang, Wan ; Plumb, Sandy ; Walczak, Adam ; Back, Anthony L. ; Tancredi, Daniel J ; Venuti, Alison ; Cipri, Camille ; Escalera, Gisela ; Ferro, Carol ; Gaudion, Don ; Hoh, Beth ; Leatherwood, Blair ; Lewis, Linda ; Robinson, Mark ; Sullivan, Peter ; Kravitz, Richard L. / Values and options in cancer care (VOICE) : Study design and rationale for a patient-centered communication and decision-making intervention for physicians, patients with advanced cancer, and their caregivers. In: BMC Cancer. 2013 ; Vol. 13.
@article{208874563f284b53aaef2e269a15ed71,
title = "Values and options in cancer care (VOICE): Study design and rationale for a patient-centered communication and decision-making intervention for physicians, patients with advanced cancer, and their caregivers",
abstract = "Background: Communication about prognosis and treatment choices is essential for informed decision making in advanced cancer. This article describes an investigation designed to facilitate communication and decision making among oncologists, patients with advanced cancer, and their caregivers.Methods/design: The Values and Options in Cancer Care (VOICE) Study is a National Cancer Institute sponsored randomized controlled trial conducted in the Rochester/Buffalo, NY and Sacramento, CA regions. A total of 40 oncologists, approximately 400 patients with advanced cancer, and their family/friend caregivers (one per patient, when available) are expected to enroll in the study. Drawing upon ecological theory, the intervention uses a two-pronged approach: oncologists complete a multifaceted tailored educational intervention involving standardized patient instructors (SPIs), and patients and caregivers complete a coaching intervention to facilitate prioritizing and discussing questions and concerns. Follow-up data will be collected approximately quarterly for up to three years.Discussion: The intervention is hypothesized to enhance patient-centered communication, quality of care, and patient outcomes. Analyses will examine the effects of the intervention on key elements of physician-patient-caregiver communication (primary outcomes), the physician-patient relationship, shared understanding of prognosis, patient well-being, and health service utilization (secondary outcomes).Trial registration: Clinical Trials Identifier: NCT01485627.",
keywords = "Cancer, Caregivers, Communication, Decision making, End-of-life care, Palliative care, Patient-centered care, Physician-patient relations, Quality of life, Utilization",
author = "Michael Hoerger and Epstein, {Ronald M.} and Winters, {Paul C.} and Kevin Fiscella and Duberstein, {Paul R.} and Robert Gramling and Butow, {Phyllis N.} and Mohile, {Supriya G.} and Paul Kaesberg and Wan Tang and Sandy Plumb and Adam Walczak and Back, {Anthony L.} and Tancredi, {Daniel J} and Alison Venuti and Camille Cipri and Gisela Escalera and Carol Ferro and Don Gaudion and Beth Hoh and Blair Leatherwood and Linda Lewis and Mark Robinson and Peter Sullivan and Kravitz, {Richard L}",
year = "2013",
month = "4",
day = "9",
doi = "10.1186/1471-2407-13-188",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
journal = "BMC Cancer",
issn = "1471-2407",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Values and options in cancer care (VOICE)

T2 - Study design and rationale for a patient-centered communication and decision-making intervention for physicians, patients with advanced cancer, and their caregivers

AU - Hoerger, Michael

AU - Epstein, Ronald M.

AU - Winters, Paul C.

AU - Fiscella, Kevin

AU - Duberstein, Paul R.

AU - Gramling, Robert

AU - Butow, Phyllis N.

AU - Mohile, Supriya G.

AU - Kaesberg, Paul

AU - Tang, Wan

AU - Plumb, Sandy

AU - Walczak, Adam

AU - Back, Anthony L.

AU - Tancredi, Daniel J

AU - Venuti, Alison

AU - Cipri, Camille

AU - Escalera, Gisela

AU - Ferro, Carol

AU - Gaudion, Don

AU - Hoh, Beth

AU - Leatherwood, Blair

AU - Lewis, Linda

AU - Robinson, Mark

AU - Sullivan, Peter

AU - Kravitz, Richard L

PY - 2013/4/9

Y1 - 2013/4/9

N2 - Background: Communication about prognosis and treatment choices is essential for informed decision making in advanced cancer. This article describes an investigation designed to facilitate communication and decision making among oncologists, patients with advanced cancer, and their caregivers.Methods/design: The Values and Options in Cancer Care (VOICE) Study is a National Cancer Institute sponsored randomized controlled trial conducted in the Rochester/Buffalo, NY and Sacramento, CA regions. A total of 40 oncologists, approximately 400 patients with advanced cancer, and their family/friend caregivers (one per patient, when available) are expected to enroll in the study. Drawing upon ecological theory, the intervention uses a two-pronged approach: oncologists complete a multifaceted tailored educational intervention involving standardized patient instructors (SPIs), and patients and caregivers complete a coaching intervention to facilitate prioritizing and discussing questions and concerns. Follow-up data will be collected approximately quarterly for up to three years.Discussion: The intervention is hypothesized to enhance patient-centered communication, quality of care, and patient outcomes. Analyses will examine the effects of the intervention on key elements of physician-patient-caregiver communication (primary outcomes), the physician-patient relationship, shared understanding of prognosis, patient well-being, and health service utilization (secondary outcomes).Trial registration: Clinical Trials Identifier: NCT01485627.

AB - Background: Communication about prognosis and treatment choices is essential for informed decision making in advanced cancer. This article describes an investigation designed to facilitate communication and decision making among oncologists, patients with advanced cancer, and their caregivers.Methods/design: The Values and Options in Cancer Care (VOICE) Study is a National Cancer Institute sponsored randomized controlled trial conducted in the Rochester/Buffalo, NY and Sacramento, CA regions. A total of 40 oncologists, approximately 400 patients with advanced cancer, and their family/friend caregivers (one per patient, when available) are expected to enroll in the study. Drawing upon ecological theory, the intervention uses a two-pronged approach: oncologists complete a multifaceted tailored educational intervention involving standardized patient instructors (SPIs), and patients and caregivers complete a coaching intervention to facilitate prioritizing and discussing questions and concerns. Follow-up data will be collected approximately quarterly for up to three years.Discussion: The intervention is hypothesized to enhance patient-centered communication, quality of care, and patient outcomes. Analyses will examine the effects of the intervention on key elements of physician-patient-caregiver communication (primary outcomes), the physician-patient relationship, shared understanding of prognosis, patient well-being, and health service utilization (secondary outcomes).Trial registration: Clinical Trials Identifier: NCT01485627.

KW - Cancer

KW - Caregivers

KW - Communication

KW - Decision making

KW - End-of-life care

KW - Palliative care

KW - Patient-centered care

KW - Physician-patient relations

KW - Quality of life

KW - Utilization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875900075&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875900075&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1471-2407-13-188

DO - 10.1186/1471-2407-13-188

M3 - Article

VL - 13

JO - BMC Cancer

JF - BMC Cancer

SN - 1471-2407

M1 - 188

ER -