Validity of using serological tests for diagnosis of diseases in wild animals

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

54 Scopus citations


Transposition of diagnostic tests used in domestic livestock species to free-ranging and captive wildlife species has two problems. First, most existing tests have not been adequately validated in domestic livestock. Second, assumptions that a serological test will perform identically in wildlife and livestock species may not be correct, due to differences in pathogenic strains and serovars, host serological responses, and exposure to organisms of similar antigenic structure which produce cross-reacting antibodies. Some assays require species-specific reagents/test components which might not be commercially available, and most assays have not been standardized. The authors outline the principles involved in the evaluation of a serological diagnostic test, and provide examples of how knowledge of test sensitivity and specificity can be used to estimate true prevalence, to determine whether a population is infected, and to facilitate management decisions with regard to animal translocations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)323-335
Number of pages13
JournalOIE Revue Scientifique et Technique
Issue number1
StatePublished - Mar 1996


  • Disease risk
  • Livestock
  • Predictive values
  • Prevalence
  • Sensitivity
  • Serological testing
  • Specificity
  • Test validation
  • Wildlife

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • veterinary(all)


Dive into the research topics of 'Validity of using serological tests for diagnosis of diseases in wild animals'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this