Validation of the Canadian clinical probability model for acute venous thrombosis

G. Patrick Shields, Samuel D Turnipseed, Edward A Panacek, Norman Melnikoff, Robert Gosselin, Richard H White

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To validate the predictive value of the Canadian clinical probability model for acute venous thrombosis, which, to the best of the authors' knowledge, has not been done in emergency department (ED) settings outside of Canada. Methods: Demographic and clinical information, rapid D-dimer testing, and venous ultrasound imaging were obtained among patients presenting with clinically suspected venous thrombosis at a university-affiliated ED. A diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) was made based on venous ultrasound test results or objectively documented venous thromboembolism during a 12-week follow-up period. The probability of venous thrombosis was calculated using the Canadian clinical probability model. Results: Among 102 patients, 17 (17%) were diagnosed as having venous thrombosis initially or during the three-month follow-up period. The frequency of venous thrombosis among patients categorized as having high probability was 10 of 17 [59%, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 35% to 82%], 6 of 44 (14%, 95% CI = 4% to 24%) with intermediate probability, and 1 of 41 (2%, 95% CI = 0.1% to 11%) with low probability. This compares with respective values of 49%, 14%, and 3%, reported by Canadian researchers in an ED study. Forty-one of 102 (40%) patients had an alternate diagnosis as likely or more likely than venous thrombosis, but only three (7%, 95% CI = 2% to 18%) of these had venous thrombosis. Conclusions: Use of the Canadian probability model for DVT in this ED resulted in effective risk stratification, comparable to previously published results.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)561-566
Number of pages6
JournalAcademic Emergency Medicine
Volume9
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002

Fingerprint

Venous Thrombosis
Hospital Emergency Service
Confidence Intervals
Venous Thromboembolism
Canada
Ultrasonography
Research Personnel
Demography

Keywords

  • Acute venous thrombosis
  • Clinical probability
  • DVT
  • Validation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Validation of the Canadian clinical probability model for acute venous thrombosis. / Shields, G. Patrick; Turnipseed, Samuel D; Panacek, Edward A; Melnikoff, Norman; Gosselin, Robert; White, Richard H.

In: Academic Emergency Medicine, Vol. 9, No. 6, 2002, p. 561-566.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{87efb480769045b68a3122efd2ac2b85,
title = "Validation of the Canadian clinical probability model for acute venous thrombosis",
abstract = "Objective: To validate the predictive value of the Canadian clinical probability model for acute venous thrombosis, which, to the best of the authors' knowledge, has not been done in emergency department (ED) settings outside of Canada. Methods: Demographic and clinical information, rapid D-dimer testing, and venous ultrasound imaging were obtained among patients presenting with clinically suspected venous thrombosis at a university-affiliated ED. A diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) was made based on venous ultrasound test results or objectively documented venous thromboembolism during a 12-week follow-up period. The probability of venous thrombosis was calculated using the Canadian clinical probability model. Results: Among 102 patients, 17 (17{\%}) were diagnosed as having venous thrombosis initially or during the three-month follow-up period. The frequency of venous thrombosis among patients categorized as having high probability was 10 of 17 [59{\%}, 95{\%} confidence interval (95{\%} CI) = 35{\%} to 82{\%}], 6 of 44 (14{\%}, 95{\%} CI = 4{\%} to 24{\%}) with intermediate probability, and 1 of 41 (2{\%}, 95{\%} CI = 0.1{\%} to 11{\%}) with low probability. This compares with respective values of 49{\%}, 14{\%}, and 3{\%}, reported by Canadian researchers in an ED study. Forty-one of 102 (40{\%}) patients had an alternate diagnosis as likely or more likely than venous thrombosis, but only three (7{\%}, 95{\%} CI = 2{\%} to 18{\%}) of these had venous thrombosis. Conclusions: Use of the Canadian probability model for DVT in this ED resulted in effective risk stratification, comparable to previously published results.",
keywords = "Acute venous thrombosis, Clinical probability, DVT, Validation",
author = "Shields, {G. Patrick} and Turnipseed, {Samuel D} and Panacek, {Edward A} and Norman Melnikoff and Robert Gosselin and White, {Richard H}",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1197/aemj.9.6.561",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "561--566",
journal = "Academic Emergency Medicine",
issn = "1069-6563",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validation of the Canadian clinical probability model for acute venous thrombosis

AU - Shields, G. Patrick

AU - Turnipseed, Samuel D

AU - Panacek, Edward A

AU - Melnikoff, Norman

AU - Gosselin, Robert

AU - White, Richard H

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Objective: To validate the predictive value of the Canadian clinical probability model for acute venous thrombosis, which, to the best of the authors' knowledge, has not been done in emergency department (ED) settings outside of Canada. Methods: Demographic and clinical information, rapid D-dimer testing, and venous ultrasound imaging were obtained among patients presenting with clinically suspected venous thrombosis at a university-affiliated ED. A diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) was made based on venous ultrasound test results or objectively documented venous thromboembolism during a 12-week follow-up period. The probability of venous thrombosis was calculated using the Canadian clinical probability model. Results: Among 102 patients, 17 (17%) were diagnosed as having venous thrombosis initially or during the three-month follow-up period. The frequency of venous thrombosis among patients categorized as having high probability was 10 of 17 [59%, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 35% to 82%], 6 of 44 (14%, 95% CI = 4% to 24%) with intermediate probability, and 1 of 41 (2%, 95% CI = 0.1% to 11%) with low probability. This compares with respective values of 49%, 14%, and 3%, reported by Canadian researchers in an ED study. Forty-one of 102 (40%) patients had an alternate diagnosis as likely or more likely than venous thrombosis, but only three (7%, 95% CI = 2% to 18%) of these had venous thrombosis. Conclusions: Use of the Canadian probability model for DVT in this ED resulted in effective risk stratification, comparable to previously published results.

AB - Objective: To validate the predictive value of the Canadian clinical probability model for acute venous thrombosis, which, to the best of the authors' knowledge, has not been done in emergency department (ED) settings outside of Canada. Methods: Demographic and clinical information, rapid D-dimer testing, and venous ultrasound imaging were obtained among patients presenting with clinically suspected venous thrombosis at a university-affiliated ED. A diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) was made based on venous ultrasound test results or objectively documented venous thromboembolism during a 12-week follow-up period. The probability of venous thrombosis was calculated using the Canadian clinical probability model. Results: Among 102 patients, 17 (17%) were diagnosed as having venous thrombosis initially or during the three-month follow-up period. The frequency of venous thrombosis among patients categorized as having high probability was 10 of 17 [59%, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 35% to 82%], 6 of 44 (14%, 95% CI = 4% to 24%) with intermediate probability, and 1 of 41 (2%, 95% CI = 0.1% to 11%) with low probability. This compares with respective values of 49%, 14%, and 3%, reported by Canadian researchers in an ED study. Forty-one of 102 (40%) patients had an alternate diagnosis as likely or more likely than venous thrombosis, but only three (7%, 95% CI = 2% to 18%) of these had venous thrombosis. Conclusions: Use of the Canadian probability model for DVT in this ED resulted in effective risk stratification, comparable to previously published results.

KW - Acute venous thrombosis

KW - Clinical probability

KW - DVT

KW - Validation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036268919&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036268919&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1197/aemj.9.6.561

DO - 10.1197/aemj.9.6.561

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 561

EP - 566

JO - Academic Emergency Medicine

JF - Academic Emergency Medicine

SN - 1069-6563

IS - 6

ER -