Validation of an indexed radiotherapy head positioning device for use in dogs and cats

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Setup variability affects the appropriate delivery of radiation and informs the setup margin required to treat radiation patients. Twenty-four veterinary patients with head and neck cancers were enrolled in this prospective, cross-sectional study to determine the accuracy of an indexed board immobilization device for positioning. Couch position values were defined at the first treatment based on setup films. At subsequent treatments, patients were moved to the previously defined couch location, orthogonal films were acquired, table position was modified, and displacement was recorded. The mean systematic displacement, random displacement, overall displacement, and mean displacement values of the three-dimensional (3D) vector were calculated. Three hundred thirty-two pairs of orthogonal setup films were analyzed for displacement in cranial-caudal, lateral, and dorsal-ventral directions. The mean systematic displacements were 0.5, 0.8, and 0.5 mm, respectively. The mean random displacements were 1.0, 1.1, and 0.7 mm, respectively. The overall displacements were 1.1, 1.4, and 0.9 mm, respectively. The mean 3D vector value was 1.6 mm with a standard deviation of 1.2 mm. Ninety-five percent of the vectors were <3.6 mm. These values were compared to data obtained with a previously used immobilization device. A t-test was used to compare the two devices. The 3D vector, random displacement in all directions, and overall displacement in the cranial-caudal and dorsal-ventral directions were significantly smaller than displacements with the previous device. The precision and accuracy of the indexed board device was superior to the historical head and neck device.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)448-455
Number of pages8
JournalVeterinary Radiology and Ultrasound
Volume56
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2015

Fingerprint

radiotherapy
Cats
Radiotherapy
Head
Dogs
cats
Equipment and Supplies
dogs
cross-sectional studies
Immobilization
neck
Radiation
Head and Neck Neoplasms
Neck
Cross-Sectional Studies
Therapeutics
Direction compound

Keywords

  • Immobilization
  • Indexed
  • Positioning
  • Radiation
  • Veterinary

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • veterinary(all)

Cite this

@article{5e507e2a25a44052b688d8c8deca49b2,
title = "Validation of an indexed radiotherapy head positioning device for use in dogs and cats",
abstract = "Setup variability affects the appropriate delivery of radiation and informs the setup margin required to treat radiation patients. Twenty-four veterinary patients with head and neck cancers were enrolled in this prospective, cross-sectional study to determine the accuracy of an indexed board immobilization device for positioning. Couch position values were defined at the first treatment based on setup films. At subsequent treatments, patients were moved to the previously defined couch location, orthogonal films were acquired, table position was modified, and displacement was recorded. The mean systematic displacement, random displacement, overall displacement, and mean displacement values of the three-dimensional (3D) vector were calculated. Three hundred thirty-two pairs of orthogonal setup films were analyzed for displacement in cranial-caudal, lateral, and dorsal-ventral directions. The mean systematic displacements were 0.5, 0.8, and 0.5 mm, respectively. The mean random displacements were 1.0, 1.1, and 0.7 mm, respectively. The overall displacements were 1.1, 1.4, and 0.9 mm, respectively. The mean 3D vector value was 1.6 mm with a standard deviation of 1.2 mm. Ninety-five percent of the vectors were <3.6 mm. These values were compared to data obtained with a previously used immobilization device. A t-test was used to compare the two devices. The 3D vector, random displacement in all directions, and overall displacement in the cranial-caudal and dorsal-ventral directions were significantly smaller than displacements with the previous device. The precision and accuracy of the indexed board device was superior to the historical head and neck device.",
keywords = "Immobilization, Indexed, Positioning, Radiation, Veterinary",
author = "Hansen, {Katherine S} and Theon, {Alain P} and Sonja Dieterich and Kent, {Michael S}",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/vru.12257",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "56",
pages = "448--455",
journal = "Veterinary Radiology and Ultrasound",
issn = "1058-8183",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validation of an indexed radiotherapy head positioning device for use in dogs and cats

AU - Hansen, Katherine S

AU - Theon, Alain P

AU - Dieterich, Sonja

AU - Kent, Michael S

PY - 2015/7/1

Y1 - 2015/7/1

N2 - Setup variability affects the appropriate delivery of radiation and informs the setup margin required to treat radiation patients. Twenty-four veterinary patients with head and neck cancers were enrolled in this prospective, cross-sectional study to determine the accuracy of an indexed board immobilization device for positioning. Couch position values were defined at the first treatment based on setup films. At subsequent treatments, patients were moved to the previously defined couch location, orthogonal films were acquired, table position was modified, and displacement was recorded. The mean systematic displacement, random displacement, overall displacement, and mean displacement values of the three-dimensional (3D) vector were calculated. Three hundred thirty-two pairs of orthogonal setup films were analyzed for displacement in cranial-caudal, lateral, and dorsal-ventral directions. The mean systematic displacements were 0.5, 0.8, and 0.5 mm, respectively. The mean random displacements were 1.0, 1.1, and 0.7 mm, respectively. The overall displacements were 1.1, 1.4, and 0.9 mm, respectively. The mean 3D vector value was 1.6 mm with a standard deviation of 1.2 mm. Ninety-five percent of the vectors were <3.6 mm. These values were compared to data obtained with a previously used immobilization device. A t-test was used to compare the two devices. The 3D vector, random displacement in all directions, and overall displacement in the cranial-caudal and dorsal-ventral directions were significantly smaller than displacements with the previous device. The precision and accuracy of the indexed board device was superior to the historical head and neck device.

AB - Setup variability affects the appropriate delivery of radiation and informs the setup margin required to treat radiation patients. Twenty-four veterinary patients with head and neck cancers were enrolled in this prospective, cross-sectional study to determine the accuracy of an indexed board immobilization device for positioning. Couch position values were defined at the first treatment based on setup films. At subsequent treatments, patients were moved to the previously defined couch location, orthogonal films were acquired, table position was modified, and displacement was recorded. The mean systematic displacement, random displacement, overall displacement, and mean displacement values of the three-dimensional (3D) vector were calculated. Three hundred thirty-two pairs of orthogonal setup films were analyzed for displacement in cranial-caudal, lateral, and dorsal-ventral directions. The mean systematic displacements were 0.5, 0.8, and 0.5 mm, respectively. The mean random displacements were 1.0, 1.1, and 0.7 mm, respectively. The overall displacements were 1.1, 1.4, and 0.9 mm, respectively. The mean 3D vector value was 1.6 mm with a standard deviation of 1.2 mm. Ninety-five percent of the vectors were <3.6 mm. These values were compared to data obtained with a previously used immobilization device. A t-test was used to compare the two devices. The 3D vector, random displacement in all directions, and overall displacement in the cranial-caudal and dorsal-ventral directions were significantly smaller than displacements with the previous device. The precision and accuracy of the indexed board device was superior to the historical head and neck device.

KW - Immobilization

KW - Indexed

KW - Positioning

KW - Radiation

KW - Veterinary

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84936214724&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84936214724&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/vru.12257

DO - 10.1111/vru.12257

M3 - Article

VL - 56

SP - 448

EP - 455

JO - Veterinary Radiology and Ultrasound

JF - Veterinary Radiology and Ultrasound

SN - 1058-8183

IS - 4

ER -