Vaginal birth after cesarean in California

Joy Melnikow, Patrick S Romano, William M. Gilbert, Michael Schembrie, Janet Keyzer, Richard L Kravitz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate rates at which women were offered and consented to trial of labor in California hospitals with high and low risk-adjusted cesarean delivery rates. METHODS: From 267 nonfederal acute-care hospitals in California that performed more than 678 deliveries in 1992-1993, 51 hospitals were selected in a stratified sample. Hospitals in the sample were categorized as having high, medium, and low risk-adjusted cesarean rates using a logistic regression model based on data from the California Patient Discharge Data System. We reviewed medical records of women with previous cesareans for evidence of counseling regarding trial of labor, other clinical variables, and method of delivery. Differences in proportions between the three groups of hospitals were compared. RESULTS: According to records of 369 women with previous cesareans, after excluding contraindications, 312 were potentially eligible for trial of labor. Hospitals with low risk-adjusted cesarean rates documented counseling women for trial of labor in over 99% of records reviewed, compared with 85% and 79%, respectively, of hospitals with intermediate and high rates (P < .001). Rates of completed vaginal births after cesarean were 71% in hospitals with low risk-adjusted cesarean rates, compared with 39% and 31% in hospitals with intermediate and high rates (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: California hospitals with high cesarean rates in 1992-1993 had markedly higher rates of repeat elective cesarean delivery without evidence of counseling regarding trial of labor. Informed patient choice is a critical element of the decision for trial of labor or elective repeat cesarean, and lack of documented counseling is cause for concern.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)421-426
Number of pages6
JournalObstetrics and Gynecology
Volume98
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001

Fingerprint

Vaginal Birth after Cesarean
Trial of Labor
Counseling
Logistic Models
Patient Discharge
Information Systems
Medical Records

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Vaginal birth after cesarean in California. / Melnikow, Joy; Romano, Patrick S; Gilbert, William M.; Schembrie, Michael; Keyzer, Janet; Kravitz, Richard L.

In: Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 98, No. 3, 2001, p. 421-426.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Melnikow, Joy ; Romano, Patrick S ; Gilbert, William M. ; Schembrie, Michael ; Keyzer, Janet ; Kravitz, Richard L. / Vaginal birth after cesarean in California. In: Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2001 ; Vol. 98, No. 3. pp. 421-426.
@article{54730c2947474cb88eb44fb532554b6c,
title = "Vaginal birth after cesarean in California",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To estimate rates at which women were offered and consented to trial of labor in California hospitals with high and low risk-adjusted cesarean delivery rates. METHODS: From 267 nonfederal acute-care hospitals in California that performed more than 678 deliveries in 1992-1993, 51 hospitals were selected in a stratified sample. Hospitals in the sample were categorized as having high, medium, and low risk-adjusted cesarean rates using a logistic regression model based on data from the California Patient Discharge Data System. We reviewed medical records of women with previous cesareans for evidence of counseling regarding trial of labor, other clinical variables, and method of delivery. Differences in proportions between the three groups of hospitals were compared. RESULTS: According to records of 369 women with previous cesareans, after excluding contraindications, 312 were potentially eligible for trial of labor. Hospitals with low risk-adjusted cesarean rates documented counseling women for trial of labor in over 99{\%} of records reviewed, compared with 85{\%} and 79{\%}, respectively, of hospitals with intermediate and high rates (P < .001). Rates of completed vaginal births after cesarean were 71{\%} in hospitals with low risk-adjusted cesarean rates, compared with 39{\%} and 31{\%} in hospitals with intermediate and high rates (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: California hospitals with high cesarean rates in 1992-1993 had markedly higher rates of repeat elective cesarean delivery without evidence of counseling regarding trial of labor. Informed patient choice is a critical element of the decision for trial of labor or elective repeat cesarean, and lack of documented counseling is cause for concern.",
author = "Joy Melnikow and Romano, {Patrick S} and Gilbert, {William M.} and Michael Schembrie and Janet Keyzer and Kravitz, {Richard L}",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1016/S0029-7844(01)01448-X",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "98",
pages = "421--426",
journal = "Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0029-7844",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Vaginal birth after cesarean in California

AU - Melnikow, Joy

AU - Romano, Patrick S

AU - Gilbert, William M.

AU - Schembrie, Michael

AU - Keyzer, Janet

AU - Kravitz, Richard L

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To estimate rates at which women were offered and consented to trial of labor in California hospitals with high and low risk-adjusted cesarean delivery rates. METHODS: From 267 nonfederal acute-care hospitals in California that performed more than 678 deliveries in 1992-1993, 51 hospitals were selected in a stratified sample. Hospitals in the sample were categorized as having high, medium, and low risk-adjusted cesarean rates using a logistic regression model based on data from the California Patient Discharge Data System. We reviewed medical records of women with previous cesareans for evidence of counseling regarding trial of labor, other clinical variables, and method of delivery. Differences in proportions between the three groups of hospitals were compared. RESULTS: According to records of 369 women with previous cesareans, after excluding contraindications, 312 were potentially eligible for trial of labor. Hospitals with low risk-adjusted cesarean rates documented counseling women for trial of labor in over 99% of records reviewed, compared with 85% and 79%, respectively, of hospitals with intermediate and high rates (P < .001). Rates of completed vaginal births after cesarean were 71% in hospitals with low risk-adjusted cesarean rates, compared with 39% and 31% in hospitals with intermediate and high rates (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: California hospitals with high cesarean rates in 1992-1993 had markedly higher rates of repeat elective cesarean delivery without evidence of counseling regarding trial of labor. Informed patient choice is a critical element of the decision for trial of labor or elective repeat cesarean, and lack of documented counseling is cause for concern.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To estimate rates at which women were offered and consented to trial of labor in California hospitals with high and low risk-adjusted cesarean delivery rates. METHODS: From 267 nonfederal acute-care hospitals in California that performed more than 678 deliveries in 1992-1993, 51 hospitals were selected in a stratified sample. Hospitals in the sample were categorized as having high, medium, and low risk-adjusted cesarean rates using a logistic regression model based on data from the California Patient Discharge Data System. We reviewed medical records of women with previous cesareans for evidence of counseling regarding trial of labor, other clinical variables, and method of delivery. Differences in proportions between the three groups of hospitals were compared. RESULTS: According to records of 369 women with previous cesareans, after excluding contraindications, 312 were potentially eligible for trial of labor. Hospitals with low risk-adjusted cesarean rates documented counseling women for trial of labor in over 99% of records reviewed, compared with 85% and 79%, respectively, of hospitals with intermediate and high rates (P < .001). Rates of completed vaginal births after cesarean were 71% in hospitals with low risk-adjusted cesarean rates, compared with 39% and 31% in hospitals with intermediate and high rates (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: California hospitals with high cesarean rates in 1992-1993 had markedly higher rates of repeat elective cesarean delivery without evidence of counseling regarding trial of labor. Informed patient choice is a critical element of the decision for trial of labor or elective repeat cesarean, and lack of documented counseling is cause for concern.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034836244&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034836244&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0029-7844(01)01448-X

DO - 10.1016/S0029-7844(01)01448-X

M3 - Article

VL - 98

SP - 421

EP - 426

JO - Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0029-7844

IS - 3

ER -