Utilizing clinical factors to reduce head CT scan ordering for minor head trauma patients

Erik C. Miller, James F Holmes Jr, Robert W. Derlet

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

141 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Our study objective was to determine whether simple clinical criteria can be used to safely reduce the number of patients who require cranial computed tomography (CT) scan after sustaining minor head trauma. Awake patients (Glascow Coma Scale = 15) who presented to the emergency department with acute head injury associated with a loss of consciousness were evaluated for clinical predictors of head injury prior to CT scan. The studied risk factors included severe headache, nausea, vomiting, and depressed skull fracture on physical examination. Patients with no risk factors present were compared with patients with one or more risk factors with respect to abnormal CT rate and rate of operative intervention for head injury. Of the 2143 patients entered into the study, 1302 (61%) had no risk factor for head injury, whereas 841 (39%) had one or more risk factors present. A total of 138 (6.4%) of those studied had an abnormal CT scan. This number included 3.7% of those patients with no risk factors vs. 11% in patients with one or more risk factors. The CT scan abnormalities in the no-risk-factor group were not clinically significant. All 5 patients who required operative intervention had at least one of the risk factors present. The use of four simple clinical criteria in minor head trauma patients would allow a 61% reduction in the number of head CT scans performed and still identify all patients who require neurosurgical intervention and the majority of patients with an abnormal CT scan. This method could lead to a large savings in patient charges nationwide. Further studies may be helpful in confirming these findings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)453-457
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Emergency Medicine
Volume15
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1997

Fingerprint

Craniocerebral Trauma
Head
Tomography
Depressed Skull Fracture
Unconsciousness
Coma
Nausea
Physical Examination
Vomiting
Headache
Hospital Emergency Service

Keywords

  • Computed tomography
  • Cost savings
  • Head CT scan
  • Head trauma
  • Trauma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Utilizing clinical factors to reduce head CT scan ordering for minor head trauma patients. / Miller, Erik C.; Holmes Jr, James F; Derlet, Robert W.

In: Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 15, No. 4, 07.1997, p. 453-457.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9bb7d93d3200480abb40d96e49e47a3b,
title = "Utilizing clinical factors to reduce head CT scan ordering for minor head trauma patients",
abstract = "Our study objective was to determine whether simple clinical criteria can be used to safely reduce the number of patients who require cranial computed tomography (CT) scan after sustaining minor head trauma. Awake patients (Glascow Coma Scale = 15) who presented to the emergency department with acute head injury associated with a loss of consciousness were evaluated for clinical predictors of head injury prior to CT scan. The studied risk factors included severe headache, nausea, vomiting, and depressed skull fracture on physical examination. Patients with no risk factors present were compared with patients with one or more risk factors with respect to abnormal CT rate and rate of operative intervention for head injury. Of the 2143 patients entered into the study, 1302 (61{\%}) had no risk factor for head injury, whereas 841 (39{\%}) had one or more risk factors present. A total of 138 (6.4{\%}) of those studied had an abnormal CT scan. This number included 3.7{\%} of those patients with no risk factors vs. 11{\%} in patients with one or more risk factors. The CT scan abnormalities in the no-risk-factor group were not clinically significant. All 5 patients who required operative intervention had at least one of the risk factors present. The use of four simple clinical criteria in minor head trauma patients would allow a 61{\%} reduction in the number of head CT scans performed and still identify all patients who require neurosurgical intervention and the majority of patients with an abnormal CT scan. This method could lead to a large savings in patient charges nationwide. Further studies may be helpful in confirming these findings.",
keywords = "Computed tomography, Cost savings, Head CT scan, Head trauma, Trauma",
author = "Miller, {Erik C.} and {Holmes Jr}, {James F} and Derlet, {Robert W.}",
year = "1997",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/S0736-4679(97)00071-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "453--457",
journal = "Journal of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0736-4679",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Utilizing clinical factors to reduce head CT scan ordering for minor head trauma patients

AU - Miller, Erik C.

AU - Holmes Jr, James F

AU - Derlet, Robert W.

PY - 1997/7

Y1 - 1997/7

N2 - Our study objective was to determine whether simple clinical criteria can be used to safely reduce the number of patients who require cranial computed tomography (CT) scan after sustaining minor head trauma. Awake patients (Glascow Coma Scale = 15) who presented to the emergency department with acute head injury associated with a loss of consciousness were evaluated for clinical predictors of head injury prior to CT scan. The studied risk factors included severe headache, nausea, vomiting, and depressed skull fracture on physical examination. Patients with no risk factors present were compared with patients with one or more risk factors with respect to abnormal CT rate and rate of operative intervention for head injury. Of the 2143 patients entered into the study, 1302 (61%) had no risk factor for head injury, whereas 841 (39%) had one or more risk factors present. A total of 138 (6.4%) of those studied had an abnormal CT scan. This number included 3.7% of those patients with no risk factors vs. 11% in patients with one or more risk factors. The CT scan abnormalities in the no-risk-factor group were not clinically significant. All 5 patients who required operative intervention had at least one of the risk factors present. The use of four simple clinical criteria in minor head trauma patients would allow a 61% reduction in the number of head CT scans performed and still identify all patients who require neurosurgical intervention and the majority of patients with an abnormal CT scan. This method could lead to a large savings in patient charges nationwide. Further studies may be helpful in confirming these findings.

AB - Our study objective was to determine whether simple clinical criteria can be used to safely reduce the number of patients who require cranial computed tomography (CT) scan after sustaining minor head trauma. Awake patients (Glascow Coma Scale = 15) who presented to the emergency department with acute head injury associated with a loss of consciousness were evaluated for clinical predictors of head injury prior to CT scan. The studied risk factors included severe headache, nausea, vomiting, and depressed skull fracture on physical examination. Patients with no risk factors present were compared with patients with one or more risk factors with respect to abnormal CT rate and rate of operative intervention for head injury. Of the 2143 patients entered into the study, 1302 (61%) had no risk factor for head injury, whereas 841 (39%) had one or more risk factors present. A total of 138 (6.4%) of those studied had an abnormal CT scan. This number included 3.7% of those patients with no risk factors vs. 11% in patients with one or more risk factors. The CT scan abnormalities in the no-risk-factor group were not clinically significant. All 5 patients who required operative intervention had at least one of the risk factors present. The use of four simple clinical criteria in minor head trauma patients would allow a 61% reduction in the number of head CT scans performed and still identify all patients who require neurosurgical intervention and the majority of patients with an abnormal CT scan. This method could lead to a large savings in patient charges nationwide. Further studies may be helpful in confirming these findings.

KW - Computed tomography

KW - Cost savings

KW - Head CT scan

KW - Head trauma

KW - Trauma

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030743491&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030743491&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0736-4679(97)00071-1

DO - 10.1016/S0736-4679(97)00071-1

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 453

EP - 457

JO - Journal of Emergency Medicine

JF - Journal of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0736-4679

IS - 4

ER -