Utilization of iron from an animal-based iron source is greater than that of ferrous sulfate in pregnant and nonpregnant women

Melissa F. Young, Ian Griffin, Eva Pressman, Allison W. McIntyre, Elizabeth Cooper, Thomas McNanley, Z. Leah Harris, Mark Westerman, Kimberly O. O'Brien

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Scopus citations

Abstract

Heme iron absorption during pregnancy and the role of hepcidin in regulating dietary heme iron absorption remains largely unexplored. The objective of this research was to examine relative differences in heme (animal based) and nonheme (ferrous sulfate) iron utilization. This study was undertaken in 18 pregnant (ages 16-32 y; wk 32-35 of gestation) and 11 nonpregnant women (ages 18-27 y). Women were randomly assigned to receive both an animal-based heme meal (intrinsically labeled 58Fe pork) and labeled ferrous sulfate (57Fe) fed on alternate days. Blood samples obtained 2 wk postdosing were used to assess iron status indicators and serum hepcidin and iron utilization based on RBC incorporation of iron isotopes. Heme iron utilization was significantly greater than nonheme iron utilization in the pregnant (47.7 ± 14.4 vs. 40.4 ± 13.2%) and nonpregnant women (50.1 ± 14.8 vs. 15.3 ± 9.7%). Among pregnant women, utilization of nonheme iron was associated with iron status, as assessed by the serum transferrin receptor concentration (P = 0.003; r2 = 0.43). In contrast, heme iron utilization was not influenced by maternal iron status. In the group as a whole, women with undetectable serum hepcidin had greater nonheme iron utilization compared with women with detectable serum hepcidin (P = 0.02; n = 29); however, there were no significant differences in heme iron utilization. Our study suggests that iron utilization from an animal-based food provides a highly bioavailable source of dietary iron for pregnant and nonpregnant women that is not as sensitive to hepcidin concentrations or iron stores compared with ferrous sulfate.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2162-2166
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Nutrition
Volume140
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2010
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Nutrition and Dietetics

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Utilization of iron from an animal-based iron source is greater than that of ferrous sulfate in pregnant and nonpregnant women'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Young, M. F., Griffin, I., Pressman, E., McIntyre, A. W., Cooper, E., McNanley, T., Harris, Z. L., Westerman, M., & O'Brien, K. O. (2010). Utilization of iron from an animal-based iron source is greater than that of ferrous sulfate in pregnant and nonpregnant women. Journal of Nutrition, 140(12), 2162-2166. https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.110.127209