Utility of the Gilliam Autism Rating Scale in Research and Clinical Populations

Mikle South, Brenda J. Williams, William M. McMahon, Thomas Owley, Pauline A. Filipek, E. Shernoff, Christine Corsello, Janet E. Lainhart, Rebecca Landa, Sally J Ozonoff

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

79 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Gilliam Autism Rating Scale (GARS) was developed as a relatively easy, inexpensive aid in the surveillance and diagnosis of autism. This study examined the validity of the GARS when used with a sample of 119 children with strict DSM-IV diagnoses of autism, ascertained from both clinical and research settings. The GARS consistently underestimated the likelihood that autistic children in this sample would be classified as having autism. The sample mean for the Autism Quotient, a hypothesized index of the likelihood of having autism, was 90.10, significantly below the reference mean of 100. Diagnostic classification according to criteria specified by the GARS resulted in a sensitivity of only .48. Limitations of rating scales in general and of the GARS specifically are discussed. It is recommended that clinicians and researchers using or considering using the GARS for autism diagnosis or ratings of autism severity recognize the need for further research regarding its use.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)593-599
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Volume32
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2002

Fingerprint

Autistic Disorder
Research
Population
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Research Personnel

Keywords

  • Assessment
  • Autism
  • Diagnosis
  • Psychometrics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Utility of the Gilliam Autism Rating Scale in Research and Clinical Populations. / South, Mikle; Williams, Brenda J.; McMahon, William M.; Owley, Thomas; Filipek, Pauline A.; Shernoff, E.; Corsello, Christine; Lainhart, Janet E.; Landa, Rebecca; Ozonoff, Sally J.

In: Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, Vol. 32, No. 6, 12.2002, p. 593-599.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

South, M, Williams, BJ, McMahon, WM, Owley, T, Filipek, PA, Shernoff, E, Corsello, C, Lainhart, JE, Landa, R & Ozonoff, SJ 2002, 'Utility of the Gilliam Autism Rating Scale in Research and Clinical Populations', Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 593-599. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021211232023
South, Mikle ; Williams, Brenda J. ; McMahon, William M. ; Owley, Thomas ; Filipek, Pauline A. ; Shernoff, E. ; Corsello, Christine ; Lainhart, Janet E. ; Landa, Rebecca ; Ozonoff, Sally J. / Utility of the Gilliam Autism Rating Scale in Research and Clinical Populations. In: Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 2002 ; Vol. 32, No. 6. pp. 593-599.
@article{2936f05f02ba43c4896b09cba0258fbf,
title = "Utility of the Gilliam Autism Rating Scale in Research and Clinical Populations",
abstract = "The Gilliam Autism Rating Scale (GARS) was developed as a relatively easy, inexpensive aid in the surveillance and diagnosis of autism. This study examined the validity of the GARS when used with a sample of 119 children with strict DSM-IV diagnoses of autism, ascertained from both clinical and research settings. The GARS consistently underestimated the likelihood that autistic children in this sample would be classified as having autism. The sample mean for the Autism Quotient, a hypothesized index of the likelihood of having autism, was 90.10, significantly below the reference mean of 100. Diagnostic classification according to criteria specified by the GARS resulted in a sensitivity of only .48. Limitations of rating scales in general and of the GARS specifically are discussed. It is recommended that clinicians and researchers using or considering using the GARS for autism diagnosis or ratings of autism severity recognize the need for further research regarding its use.",
keywords = "Assessment, Autism, Diagnosis, Psychometrics",
author = "Mikle South and Williams, {Brenda J.} and McMahon, {William M.} and Thomas Owley and Filipek, {Pauline A.} and E. Shernoff and Christine Corsello and Lainhart, {Janet E.} and Rebecca Landa and Ozonoff, {Sally J}",
year = "2002",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1023/A:1021211232023",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "593--599",
journal = "Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders",
issn = "0162-3257",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Utility of the Gilliam Autism Rating Scale in Research and Clinical Populations

AU - South, Mikle

AU - Williams, Brenda J.

AU - McMahon, William M.

AU - Owley, Thomas

AU - Filipek, Pauline A.

AU - Shernoff, E.

AU - Corsello, Christine

AU - Lainhart, Janet E.

AU - Landa, Rebecca

AU - Ozonoff, Sally J

PY - 2002/12

Y1 - 2002/12

N2 - The Gilliam Autism Rating Scale (GARS) was developed as a relatively easy, inexpensive aid in the surveillance and diagnosis of autism. This study examined the validity of the GARS when used with a sample of 119 children with strict DSM-IV diagnoses of autism, ascertained from both clinical and research settings. The GARS consistently underestimated the likelihood that autistic children in this sample would be classified as having autism. The sample mean for the Autism Quotient, a hypothesized index of the likelihood of having autism, was 90.10, significantly below the reference mean of 100. Diagnostic classification according to criteria specified by the GARS resulted in a sensitivity of only .48. Limitations of rating scales in general and of the GARS specifically are discussed. It is recommended that clinicians and researchers using or considering using the GARS for autism diagnosis or ratings of autism severity recognize the need for further research regarding its use.

AB - The Gilliam Autism Rating Scale (GARS) was developed as a relatively easy, inexpensive aid in the surveillance and diagnosis of autism. This study examined the validity of the GARS when used with a sample of 119 children with strict DSM-IV diagnoses of autism, ascertained from both clinical and research settings. The GARS consistently underestimated the likelihood that autistic children in this sample would be classified as having autism. The sample mean for the Autism Quotient, a hypothesized index of the likelihood of having autism, was 90.10, significantly below the reference mean of 100. Diagnostic classification according to criteria specified by the GARS resulted in a sensitivity of only .48. Limitations of rating scales in general and of the GARS specifically are discussed. It is recommended that clinicians and researchers using or considering using the GARS for autism diagnosis or ratings of autism severity recognize the need for further research regarding its use.

KW - Assessment

KW - Autism

KW - Diagnosis

KW - Psychometrics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0038179516&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0038179516&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1023/A:1021211232023

DO - 10.1023/A:1021211232023

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 593

EP - 599

JO - Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

JF - Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

SN - 0162-3257

IS - 6

ER -