Using financial incentives to promote shared mental health care

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To consider the most common primary care reimbursement structures, to identify incentives inherent in each, and to discuss how each could be used to encourage a shared-care approach to treating mental disorders at the primary care level. Method: Three major financial reimbursement models - fee-for-service, capitation, and blended payment mechanisms - are examined. Each is considered in terms of its risk-sharing elements and the consequent incentives. We offer several scenarios to illustrate how the shared-care practice model might be encouraged under each financing mechanism. Results: The current fee-for-service system does not encourage shared care. For wide adoption of the shared-care practice model, there must be a change in the reimbursement system's incentives. While none of the financing mechanisms offers a perfect solution, each has potential. Each, however, must be carefully tailored to its environment. Conclusions: Financial considerations are just one aspect to achieving shared care. Nevertheless, in designing a system to encourage collaborative, coordinated care for those suffering from mental illness, decision makers should be wary of creating or maintaining obstacles (financial or otherwise) to provision of accessible, high-quality care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)488-495
Number of pages8
JournalCanadian Journal of Psychiatry
Volume46
Issue number6
StatePublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Fee-for-Service Plans
Motivation
Primary Health Care
Mental Health
Incentive Reimbursement
Delivery of Health Care
Quality of Health Care
Psychological Stress
Mental Disorders

Keywords

  • Blended payments
  • Capitation
  • Fee-for-service
  • Financial incentives
  • Shared mental health care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Using financial incentives to promote shared mental health care. / Dewa, Carolyn S; Hoch, Jeffrey S; Goering, Paula.

In: Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 46, No. 6, 2001, p. 488-495.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{bf8d72de7a2c4200b4af3f92ad7af796,
title = "Using financial incentives to promote shared mental health care",
abstract = "Objectives: To consider the most common primary care reimbursement structures, to identify incentives inherent in each, and to discuss how each could be used to encourage a shared-care approach to treating mental disorders at the primary care level. Method: Three major financial reimbursement models - fee-for-service, capitation, and blended payment mechanisms - are examined. Each is considered in terms of its risk-sharing elements and the consequent incentives. We offer several scenarios to illustrate how the shared-care practice model might be encouraged under each financing mechanism. Results: The current fee-for-service system does not encourage shared care. For wide adoption of the shared-care practice model, there must be a change in the reimbursement system's incentives. While none of the financing mechanisms offers a perfect solution, each has potential. Each, however, must be carefully tailored to its environment. Conclusions: Financial considerations are just one aspect to achieving shared care. Nevertheless, in designing a system to encourage collaborative, coordinated care for those suffering from mental illness, decision makers should be wary of creating or maintaining obstacles (financial or otherwise) to provision of accessible, high-quality care.",
keywords = "Blended payments, Capitation, Fee-for-service, Financial incentives, Shared mental health care",
author = "Dewa, {Carolyn S} and Hoch, {Jeffrey S} and Paula Goering",
year = "2001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "46",
pages = "488--495",
journal = "Canadian Journal of Psychiatry",
issn = "0706-7437",
publisher = "Canadian Psychiatric Association",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using financial incentives to promote shared mental health care

AU - Dewa, Carolyn S

AU - Hoch, Jeffrey S

AU - Goering, Paula

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Objectives: To consider the most common primary care reimbursement structures, to identify incentives inherent in each, and to discuss how each could be used to encourage a shared-care approach to treating mental disorders at the primary care level. Method: Three major financial reimbursement models - fee-for-service, capitation, and blended payment mechanisms - are examined. Each is considered in terms of its risk-sharing elements and the consequent incentives. We offer several scenarios to illustrate how the shared-care practice model might be encouraged under each financing mechanism. Results: The current fee-for-service system does not encourage shared care. For wide adoption of the shared-care practice model, there must be a change in the reimbursement system's incentives. While none of the financing mechanisms offers a perfect solution, each has potential. Each, however, must be carefully tailored to its environment. Conclusions: Financial considerations are just one aspect to achieving shared care. Nevertheless, in designing a system to encourage collaborative, coordinated care for those suffering from mental illness, decision makers should be wary of creating or maintaining obstacles (financial or otherwise) to provision of accessible, high-quality care.

AB - Objectives: To consider the most common primary care reimbursement structures, to identify incentives inherent in each, and to discuss how each could be used to encourage a shared-care approach to treating mental disorders at the primary care level. Method: Three major financial reimbursement models - fee-for-service, capitation, and blended payment mechanisms - are examined. Each is considered in terms of its risk-sharing elements and the consequent incentives. We offer several scenarios to illustrate how the shared-care practice model might be encouraged under each financing mechanism. Results: The current fee-for-service system does not encourage shared care. For wide adoption of the shared-care practice model, there must be a change in the reimbursement system's incentives. While none of the financing mechanisms offers a perfect solution, each has potential. Each, however, must be carefully tailored to its environment. Conclusions: Financial considerations are just one aspect to achieving shared care. Nevertheless, in designing a system to encourage collaborative, coordinated care for those suffering from mental illness, decision makers should be wary of creating or maintaining obstacles (financial or otherwise) to provision of accessible, high-quality care.

KW - Blended payments

KW - Capitation

KW - Fee-for-service

KW - Financial incentives

KW - Shared mental health care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034818581&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034818581&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review article

VL - 46

SP - 488

EP - 495

JO - Canadian Journal of Psychiatry

JF - Canadian Journal of Psychiatry

SN - 0706-7437

IS - 6

ER -