Use and Underlying Reasons for Duty Hour Flexibility in the Flexibility in Duty Hour Requirements for Surgical Trainees (FIRST) Trial

Karl Y. Bilimoria, Christopher M. Quinn, Allison R. Dahlke, Rachel R. Kelz, Judy A. Shea, Ravi Rajaram, Remi Love, Lindsey Kreutzer, Thomas Biester, Anthony D. Yang, David B. Hoyt, Frank R. Lewis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background The Flexibility in Duty Hour Requirements for Surgical Trainees (FIRST) Trial randomly assigned surgical residency programs to either standard duty hour policies or flexible policies that eliminated caps on shift lengths and time off between shifts. Our objectives were to assess adherence to duty hour requirements in the Standard Policy arm and examine how often and why duty hour flexibility was used in the Flexible Policy arm. Study Design A total of 3,795 residents in the FIRST trial completed a survey in January 2016 (response rate >95%) that asked how often and why they exceeded current standard duty hour limits in both study arms. Results Flexible Policy interns worked more than 16 hours continuously at least once in a month more frequently than Standard Policy residents (86% vs 37.8%). Flexible Policy residents worked more than 28 hours once in a month more frequently than Standard Policy residents (PGY1: 64% vs 2.9%; PGY2 to 3: 62.4% vs 41.9%; PGY4 to 5: 52.2% vs 36.6%), but this occurred most frequently only 1 to 2 times per month. Although residents reported working more than 80 hours in a week 3 or more times in the most recent month more frequently under Flexible Policy vs Standard Policy (19.9% vs 16.2%), the difference was driven by interns (30.9% vs 19.6%), and there were no significant differences in exceeding 80 hours among PGY2 to 5 residents. The most common reasons reported for extending duty hours were facilitating care transitions (76.6%), stabilizing critically ill patients (70.7%), performing routine responsibilities (67.9%), and operating on patients known to the trainee (62.0%). Conclusions There were differences in duty hours worked by residents in the Flexible vs Standard Policy arms of the FIRST trial, but it appeared that residents generally used the flexibility for patient care and educational opportunities selectively.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)118-125
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the American College of Surgeons
Volume224
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2017
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Use and Underlying Reasons for Duty Hour Flexibility in the Flexibility in Duty Hour Requirements for Surgical Trainees (FIRST) Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Bilimoria, K. Y., Quinn, C. M., Dahlke, A. R., Kelz, R. R., Shea, J. A., Rajaram, R., Love, R., Kreutzer, L., Biester, T., Yang, A. D., Hoyt, D. B., & Lewis, F. R. (2017). Use and Underlying Reasons for Duty Hour Flexibility in the Flexibility in Duty Hour Requirements for Surgical Trainees (FIRST) Trial. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 224(2), 118-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.10.046