Urodynamic comparison of ileum vs. sigmoid in augmentation cystoplasty for neurogenic bladder dysfunction

S. B. Radomski, S. Herschorn, Anthony R Stone

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We performed multichannel urodynamics before and after augmentation cystoplasty in 26 patients (11 females, 15 males) to determine which bowel segment is best to achieve a large volume and low pressure reservoir. All 26 patients had a neurogenic cause for their bladder dysfunction. Ileum was used in 14 patients and sigmoid was used in 12 patients. Detubularization was performed in all patients. Capacity improved significantly in both the ileum and the sigmoid group after surgery. When detubularized ileum was used, the maximum amplitude of uninhibited reservoir contractions was significantly improved or eliminated postoperatively. When sigmoid was used, uninhibited reservoir contractions did not significantly improve postoperatively and were, in fact, more common than preoperatively. Despite the detubularization, pressure waves were identified in 15 of the 26 patients postoperatively. There was significant improvement in end filling pressures at capacity (compliance) with both ileum and sigmoid postoperatively. However, end filling pressures were significantly higher in the sigmoid group. In conclusion, good capacity was achieved with both ileum and sigmoid postoperatively. However, ileum provided lower reservoir pressures and better compliance. We feel that urodynamically detubularized ileum is better suited than sigmoid for augmentation cystoplasty in patients with neurogenic bladder dysfunction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)231-237
Number of pages7
JournalNeurourology and Urodynamics
Volume14
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1995

Fingerprint

Neurogenic Urinary Bladder
Urodynamics
Sigmoid Colon
Ileum
Pressure
Compliance
Urinary Bladder

Keywords

  • augmentation cystoplasty
  • neurogenic bladder
  • urodynamics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Nephrology
  • Urology

Cite this

Urodynamic comparison of ileum vs. sigmoid in augmentation cystoplasty for neurogenic bladder dysfunction. / Radomski, S. B.; Herschorn, S.; Stone, Anthony R.

In: Neurourology and Urodynamics, Vol. 14, No. 3, 1995, p. 231-237.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bdf327d2d43f45229022009de65f726b,
title = "Urodynamic comparison of ileum vs. sigmoid in augmentation cystoplasty for neurogenic bladder dysfunction",
abstract = "We performed multichannel urodynamics before and after augmentation cystoplasty in 26 patients (11 females, 15 males) to determine which bowel segment is best to achieve a large volume and low pressure reservoir. All 26 patients had a neurogenic cause for their bladder dysfunction. Ileum was used in 14 patients and sigmoid was used in 12 patients. Detubularization was performed in all patients. Capacity improved significantly in both the ileum and the sigmoid group after surgery. When detubularized ileum was used, the maximum amplitude of uninhibited reservoir contractions was significantly improved or eliminated postoperatively. When sigmoid was used, uninhibited reservoir contractions did not significantly improve postoperatively and were, in fact, more common than preoperatively. Despite the detubularization, pressure waves were identified in 15 of the 26 patients postoperatively. There was significant improvement in end filling pressures at capacity (compliance) with both ileum and sigmoid postoperatively. However, end filling pressures were significantly higher in the sigmoid group. In conclusion, good capacity was achieved with both ileum and sigmoid postoperatively. However, ileum provided lower reservoir pressures and better compliance. We feel that urodynamically detubularized ileum is better suited than sigmoid for augmentation cystoplasty in patients with neurogenic bladder dysfunction.",
keywords = "augmentation cystoplasty, neurogenic bladder, urodynamics",
author = "Radomski, {S. B.} and S. Herschorn and Stone, {Anthony R}",
year = "1995",
doi = "10.1002/nau.1930140304",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "231--237",
journal = "Neurourology and Urodynamics",
issn = "0733-2467",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Urodynamic comparison of ileum vs. sigmoid in augmentation cystoplasty for neurogenic bladder dysfunction

AU - Radomski, S. B.

AU - Herschorn, S.

AU - Stone, Anthony R

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - We performed multichannel urodynamics before and after augmentation cystoplasty in 26 patients (11 females, 15 males) to determine which bowel segment is best to achieve a large volume and low pressure reservoir. All 26 patients had a neurogenic cause for their bladder dysfunction. Ileum was used in 14 patients and sigmoid was used in 12 patients. Detubularization was performed in all patients. Capacity improved significantly in both the ileum and the sigmoid group after surgery. When detubularized ileum was used, the maximum amplitude of uninhibited reservoir contractions was significantly improved or eliminated postoperatively. When sigmoid was used, uninhibited reservoir contractions did not significantly improve postoperatively and were, in fact, more common than preoperatively. Despite the detubularization, pressure waves were identified in 15 of the 26 patients postoperatively. There was significant improvement in end filling pressures at capacity (compliance) with both ileum and sigmoid postoperatively. However, end filling pressures were significantly higher in the sigmoid group. In conclusion, good capacity was achieved with both ileum and sigmoid postoperatively. However, ileum provided lower reservoir pressures and better compliance. We feel that urodynamically detubularized ileum is better suited than sigmoid for augmentation cystoplasty in patients with neurogenic bladder dysfunction.

AB - We performed multichannel urodynamics before and after augmentation cystoplasty in 26 patients (11 females, 15 males) to determine which bowel segment is best to achieve a large volume and low pressure reservoir. All 26 patients had a neurogenic cause for their bladder dysfunction. Ileum was used in 14 patients and sigmoid was used in 12 patients. Detubularization was performed in all patients. Capacity improved significantly in both the ileum and the sigmoid group after surgery. When detubularized ileum was used, the maximum amplitude of uninhibited reservoir contractions was significantly improved or eliminated postoperatively. When sigmoid was used, uninhibited reservoir contractions did not significantly improve postoperatively and were, in fact, more common than preoperatively. Despite the detubularization, pressure waves were identified in 15 of the 26 patients postoperatively. There was significant improvement in end filling pressures at capacity (compliance) with both ileum and sigmoid postoperatively. However, end filling pressures were significantly higher in the sigmoid group. In conclusion, good capacity was achieved with both ileum and sigmoid postoperatively. However, ileum provided lower reservoir pressures and better compliance. We feel that urodynamically detubularized ileum is better suited than sigmoid for augmentation cystoplasty in patients with neurogenic bladder dysfunction.

KW - augmentation cystoplasty

KW - neurogenic bladder

KW - urodynamics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028999225&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028999225&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/nau.1930140304

DO - 10.1002/nau.1930140304

M3 - Article

C2 - 7647805

AN - SCOPUS:0028999225

VL - 14

SP - 231

EP - 237

JO - Neurourology and Urodynamics

JF - Neurourology and Urodynamics

SN - 0733-2467

IS - 3

ER -