Urethral atrophy after artificial urinary sphincter placement

Is cuff downsizing effective?

Amir Saffarian, Kilian Walsh, Ian K. Walsh, Anthony R Stone

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: We reviewed the outcome of cuff downsizing with an artificial urinary sphincter for treating recurrent incontinence due to urethral atrophy. Materials and Methods: We analyzed the records of 17 patients in a 7-year period in whom clinical, radiological and urodynamic evidence of urethral atrophy was treated with cuff downsizing. Cuff downsizing was accomplished by removing the existing cuff and replacing it with a 4 cm. cuff within the established false capsule. Incontinence and satisfaction parameters before and after the procedure were assessed by a validated questionnaire. Results: Mean patient age was 70 years (range 62 to 79). Average time to urethral atrophy was 31 months (range 5 to 96) after primary sphincter implantation. Mean followup after downsizing was 22 months (range 1 to 64). Cuff downsizing caused a mean decrease of 3.9 to 0.5 pads daily. The number of severe leakage episodes decreased from a mean of 5.4 to 2.1 The mean SEAPI (stress leakage, emptying, anatomy, protection, inhibition) score decreased from 8.2 to 2.4. Patient satisfaction increased from 15% to 80% after cuff downsizing. In 1 patient an infected cuff required complete removal of the device. Conclusions: Patient satisfaction and continence parameters improved after cuff downsizing. We believe that this technique is a simple and effective method of restoring continence after urethral atrophy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)567-569
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume169
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2003

Fingerprint

Artificial Urinary Sphincter
Atrophy
Patient Satisfaction
Device Removal
Urodynamics
Capsules
Anatomy

Keywords

  • Atrophy
  • Questionnaires
  • Urethra
  • Urinary sphincter, artificial

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Urethral atrophy after artificial urinary sphincter placement : Is cuff downsizing effective? / Saffarian, Amir; Walsh, Kilian; Walsh, Ian K.; Stone, Anthony R.

In: Journal of Urology, Vol. 169, No. 2, 01.02.2003, p. 567-569.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Saffarian, Amir ; Walsh, Kilian ; Walsh, Ian K. ; Stone, Anthony R. / Urethral atrophy after artificial urinary sphincter placement : Is cuff downsizing effective?. In: Journal of Urology. 2003 ; Vol. 169, No. 2. pp. 567-569.
@article{526e2c0e290a4cf9ae942a82985a0bc9,
title = "Urethral atrophy after artificial urinary sphincter placement: Is cuff downsizing effective?",
abstract = "Purpose: We reviewed the outcome of cuff downsizing with an artificial urinary sphincter for treating recurrent incontinence due to urethral atrophy. Materials and Methods: We analyzed the records of 17 patients in a 7-year period in whom clinical, radiological and urodynamic evidence of urethral atrophy was treated with cuff downsizing. Cuff downsizing was accomplished by removing the existing cuff and replacing it with a 4 cm. cuff within the established false capsule. Incontinence and satisfaction parameters before and after the procedure were assessed by a validated questionnaire. Results: Mean patient age was 70 years (range 62 to 79). Average time to urethral atrophy was 31 months (range 5 to 96) after primary sphincter implantation. Mean followup after downsizing was 22 months (range 1 to 64). Cuff downsizing caused a mean decrease of 3.9 to 0.5 pads daily. The number of severe leakage episodes decreased from a mean of 5.4 to 2.1 The mean SEAPI (stress leakage, emptying, anatomy, protection, inhibition) score decreased from 8.2 to 2.4. Patient satisfaction increased from 15{\%} to 80{\%} after cuff downsizing. In 1 patient an infected cuff required complete removal of the device. Conclusions: Patient satisfaction and continence parameters improved after cuff downsizing. We believe that this technique is a simple and effective method of restoring continence after urethral atrophy.",
keywords = "Atrophy, Questionnaires, Urethra, Urinary sphincter, artificial",
author = "Amir Saffarian and Kilian Walsh and Walsh, {Ian K.} and Stone, {Anthony R}",
year = "2003",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0022-5347(05)63954-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "169",
pages = "567--569",
journal = "Journal of Urology",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Urethral atrophy after artificial urinary sphincter placement

T2 - Is cuff downsizing effective?

AU - Saffarian, Amir

AU - Walsh, Kilian

AU - Walsh, Ian K.

AU - Stone, Anthony R

PY - 2003/2/1

Y1 - 2003/2/1

N2 - Purpose: We reviewed the outcome of cuff downsizing with an artificial urinary sphincter for treating recurrent incontinence due to urethral atrophy. Materials and Methods: We analyzed the records of 17 patients in a 7-year period in whom clinical, radiological and urodynamic evidence of urethral atrophy was treated with cuff downsizing. Cuff downsizing was accomplished by removing the existing cuff and replacing it with a 4 cm. cuff within the established false capsule. Incontinence and satisfaction parameters before and after the procedure were assessed by a validated questionnaire. Results: Mean patient age was 70 years (range 62 to 79). Average time to urethral atrophy was 31 months (range 5 to 96) after primary sphincter implantation. Mean followup after downsizing was 22 months (range 1 to 64). Cuff downsizing caused a mean decrease of 3.9 to 0.5 pads daily. The number of severe leakage episodes decreased from a mean of 5.4 to 2.1 The mean SEAPI (stress leakage, emptying, anatomy, protection, inhibition) score decreased from 8.2 to 2.4. Patient satisfaction increased from 15% to 80% after cuff downsizing. In 1 patient an infected cuff required complete removal of the device. Conclusions: Patient satisfaction and continence parameters improved after cuff downsizing. We believe that this technique is a simple and effective method of restoring continence after urethral atrophy.

AB - Purpose: We reviewed the outcome of cuff downsizing with an artificial urinary sphincter for treating recurrent incontinence due to urethral atrophy. Materials and Methods: We analyzed the records of 17 patients in a 7-year period in whom clinical, radiological and urodynamic evidence of urethral atrophy was treated with cuff downsizing. Cuff downsizing was accomplished by removing the existing cuff and replacing it with a 4 cm. cuff within the established false capsule. Incontinence and satisfaction parameters before and after the procedure were assessed by a validated questionnaire. Results: Mean patient age was 70 years (range 62 to 79). Average time to urethral atrophy was 31 months (range 5 to 96) after primary sphincter implantation. Mean followup after downsizing was 22 months (range 1 to 64). Cuff downsizing caused a mean decrease of 3.9 to 0.5 pads daily. The number of severe leakage episodes decreased from a mean of 5.4 to 2.1 The mean SEAPI (stress leakage, emptying, anatomy, protection, inhibition) score decreased from 8.2 to 2.4. Patient satisfaction increased from 15% to 80% after cuff downsizing. In 1 patient an infected cuff required complete removal of the device. Conclusions: Patient satisfaction and continence parameters improved after cuff downsizing. We believe that this technique is a simple and effective method of restoring continence after urethral atrophy.

KW - Atrophy

KW - Questionnaires

KW - Urethra

KW - Urinary sphincter, artificial

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037304520&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037304520&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)63954-7

DO - 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)63954-7

M3 - Article

VL - 169

SP - 567

EP - 569

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 2

ER -