Unspecified injuries on death certificates: A source of bias in injury research

Patrick S Romano, Elizabeth Mcloughlin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Protective gear (for example, helmets and bulletproof vests) shields certain body regions from damaging energy. Failure to specify on death certificates the body region and nature of fatal injuries compromises the utility of mortality data for epidemiologic or prevention research. Of fatally injured California motorcyclists, 41% had no specific injuries listed on their death certificates in 1988. To examine the implications of this problem, the authors abstracted 186 coroner's or medical examiner's reports from four California counties with over 60% nonspecific injuries and one county with few such injuries. These data were merged with computerized death certificate files and with the Fatal Accident Reporting System. Among the 99 cases with nonspecific injury codes, 68% had head injuries, 63% had chest injuries, 58% had abdominal injuries, and 58% had extremity injuries. Reporting sensitivity in the four problem counties varied from 36% for head injury to less than 5% for abdominal, spinal, and extremity injury. The association between head injury and failure to wear a helmet was statistically significant using the coroner's diagnoses (p = 0.02), but not using death certificate diagnoses (p = 0.17). The value of mortality data to injury researchers would be enhanced by better reporting of the nature of injury on death certificates.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)863-872
Number of pages10
JournalAmerican Journal of Epidemiology
Volume136
Issue number7
StatePublished - Oct 1 1992

Fingerprint

Death Certificates
Wounds and Injuries
Research
Craniocerebral Trauma
Head Protective Devices
Coroners and Medical Examiners
Body Regions
Extremities
Abdominal Injuries
Spinal Injuries
Thoracic Injuries
Mortality
Accidents
Research Personnel

Keywords

  • Accident prevention
  • Accidents
  • Bias (epidemiology)
  • Death certificates
  • Mortality
  • Motorcycles
  • Protective devices
  • Wounds and injuries

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geriatrics and Gerontology
  • Epidemiology

Cite this

Unspecified injuries on death certificates : A source of bias in injury research. / Romano, Patrick S; Mcloughlin, Elizabeth.

In: American Journal of Epidemiology, Vol. 136, No. 7, 01.10.1992, p. 863-872.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b965ffce837d468eb41f031cedab43c4,
title = "Unspecified injuries on death certificates: A source of bias in injury research",
abstract = "Protective gear (for example, helmets and bulletproof vests) shields certain body regions from damaging energy. Failure to specify on death certificates the body region and nature of fatal injuries compromises the utility of mortality data for epidemiologic or prevention research. Of fatally injured California motorcyclists, 41{\%} had no specific injuries listed on their death certificates in 1988. To examine the implications of this problem, the authors abstracted 186 coroner's or medical examiner's reports from four California counties with over 60{\%} nonspecific injuries and one county with few such injuries. These data were merged with computerized death certificate files and with the Fatal Accident Reporting System. Among the 99 cases with nonspecific injury codes, 68{\%} had head injuries, 63{\%} had chest injuries, 58{\%} had abdominal injuries, and 58{\%} had extremity injuries. Reporting sensitivity in the four problem counties varied from 36{\%} for head injury to less than 5{\%} for abdominal, spinal, and extremity injury. The association between head injury and failure to wear a helmet was statistically significant using the coroner's diagnoses (p = 0.02), but not using death certificate diagnoses (p = 0.17). The value of mortality data to injury researchers would be enhanced by better reporting of the nature of injury on death certificates.",
keywords = "Accident prevention, Accidents, Bias (epidemiology), Death certificates, Mortality, Motorcycles, Protective devices, Wounds and injuries",
author = "Romano, {Patrick S} and Elizabeth Mcloughlin",
year = "1992",
month = "10",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "136",
pages = "863--872",
journal = "American Journal of Epidemiology",
issn = "0002-9262",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Unspecified injuries on death certificates

T2 - A source of bias in injury research

AU - Romano, Patrick S

AU - Mcloughlin, Elizabeth

PY - 1992/10/1

Y1 - 1992/10/1

N2 - Protective gear (for example, helmets and bulletproof vests) shields certain body regions from damaging energy. Failure to specify on death certificates the body region and nature of fatal injuries compromises the utility of mortality data for epidemiologic or prevention research. Of fatally injured California motorcyclists, 41% had no specific injuries listed on their death certificates in 1988. To examine the implications of this problem, the authors abstracted 186 coroner's or medical examiner's reports from four California counties with over 60% nonspecific injuries and one county with few such injuries. These data were merged with computerized death certificate files and with the Fatal Accident Reporting System. Among the 99 cases with nonspecific injury codes, 68% had head injuries, 63% had chest injuries, 58% had abdominal injuries, and 58% had extremity injuries. Reporting sensitivity in the four problem counties varied from 36% for head injury to less than 5% for abdominal, spinal, and extremity injury. The association between head injury and failure to wear a helmet was statistically significant using the coroner's diagnoses (p = 0.02), but not using death certificate diagnoses (p = 0.17). The value of mortality data to injury researchers would be enhanced by better reporting of the nature of injury on death certificates.

AB - Protective gear (for example, helmets and bulletproof vests) shields certain body regions from damaging energy. Failure to specify on death certificates the body region and nature of fatal injuries compromises the utility of mortality data for epidemiologic or prevention research. Of fatally injured California motorcyclists, 41% had no specific injuries listed on their death certificates in 1988. To examine the implications of this problem, the authors abstracted 186 coroner's or medical examiner's reports from four California counties with over 60% nonspecific injuries and one county with few such injuries. These data were merged with computerized death certificate files and with the Fatal Accident Reporting System. Among the 99 cases with nonspecific injury codes, 68% had head injuries, 63% had chest injuries, 58% had abdominal injuries, and 58% had extremity injuries. Reporting sensitivity in the four problem counties varied from 36% for head injury to less than 5% for abdominal, spinal, and extremity injury. The association between head injury and failure to wear a helmet was statistically significant using the coroner's diagnoses (p = 0.02), but not using death certificate diagnoses (p = 0.17). The value of mortality data to injury researchers would be enhanced by better reporting of the nature of injury on death certificates.

KW - Accident prevention

KW - Accidents

KW - Bias (epidemiology)

KW - Death certificates

KW - Mortality

KW - Motorcycles

KW - Protective devices

KW - Wounds and injuries

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026540151&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026540151&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 1442752

AN - SCOPUS:0026540151

VL - 136

SP - 863

EP - 872

JO - American Journal of Epidemiology

JF - American Journal of Epidemiology

SN - 0002-9262

IS - 7

ER -