Understanding organ transplantation in the USA using geographical social networks

Srividhya Venugopal, Evan Stoner, Martin Cadeiras, Ronaldo Menezes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

As of December 2011, 110,629 Americans are waiting for an organ transplant and yet only 28,664 people received organ transplants in 2010. This fact alone demonstrates the USA is facing an organ shortage crisis. Added to this, there is strong evidence that the organs made available are not being used efficiently, with 20 % of them going unused (for kidneys). It is tempting to investigate how new allocation policies could be implemented, but it would be more prudent to first understand the structure of the organ donation system in the USA. In spite of availability of data on transplants, to our knowledge no proper analysis has been done using the available data. This paper looks at organ transplantation data and what its structure may reveal about the allocation process currently in place. In order to structure the data, we used techniques from network sciences to build a network of locations (henceforth called a geographical social network, GSN) representing all transplants in the USA since 1987—locations represent states or zipcodes in the USA. This social structure is then analyzed using techniques from network sciences to bring clarity to the organ donation process. One of the main items in organ donation policies is the issue of locality which argues that allocation mechanisms should try to prioritize patients who are near the location where the organ became available. This is an important issue because the longer the organ takes to be transplanted the worse its quality. We show that network science techniques may shed some light on this process and demonstrate inconsistencies across different organs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)457-473
Number of pages17
JournalSocial Network Analysis and Mining
Volume3
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Transplantation (surgical)
Transplants
organ donation
social network
organ transplant
science
social structure
shortage
Availability
evidence

Keywords

  • Data visualization
  • Geographical social networks
  • Network sciences
  • Organ allocation
  • Organ transplantation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Information Systems
  • Communication
  • Media Technology
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Computer Science Applications

Cite this

Understanding organ transplantation in the USA using geographical social networks. / Venugopal, Srividhya; Stoner, Evan; Cadeiras, Martin; Menezes, Ronaldo.

In: Social Network Analysis and Mining, Vol. 3, No. 3, 01.01.2013, p. 457-473.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Venugopal, Srividhya ; Stoner, Evan ; Cadeiras, Martin ; Menezes, Ronaldo. / Understanding organ transplantation in the USA using geographical social networks. In: Social Network Analysis and Mining. 2013 ; Vol. 3, No. 3. pp. 457-473.
@article{809f405d85814579abf9f0f4a33b669f,
title = "Understanding organ transplantation in the USA using geographical social networks",
abstract = "As of December 2011, 110,629 Americans are waiting for an organ transplant and yet only 28,664 people received organ transplants in 2010. This fact alone demonstrates the USA is facing an organ shortage crisis. Added to this, there is strong evidence that the organs made available are not being used efficiently, with 20 {\%} of them going unused (for kidneys). It is tempting to investigate how new allocation policies could be implemented, but it would be more prudent to first understand the structure of the organ donation system in the USA. In spite of availability of data on transplants, to our knowledge no proper analysis has been done using the available data. This paper looks at organ transplantation data and what its structure may reveal about the allocation process currently in place. In order to structure the data, we used techniques from network sciences to build a network of locations (henceforth called a geographical social network, GSN) representing all transplants in the USA since 1987—locations represent states or zipcodes in the USA. This social structure is then analyzed using techniques from network sciences to bring clarity to the organ donation process. One of the main items in organ donation policies is the issue of locality which argues that allocation mechanisms should try to prioritize patients who are near the location where the organ became available. This is an important issue because the longer the organ takes to be transplanted the worse its quality. We show that network science techniques may shed some light on this process and demonstrate inconsistencies across different organs.",
keywords = "Data visualization, Geographical social networks, Network sciences, Organ allocation, Organ transplantation",
author = "Srividhya Venugopal and Evan Stoner and Martin Cadeiras and Ronaldo Menezes",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s13278-012-0089-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "457--473",
journal = "Social Network Analysis and Mining",
issn = "1869-5450",
publisher = "Springer Wien",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding organ transplantation in the USA using geographical social networks

AU - Venugopal, Srividhya

AU - Stoner, Evan

AU - Cadeiras, Martin

AU - Menezes, Ronaldo

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - As of December 2011, 110,629 Americans are waiting for an organ transplant and yet only 28,664 people received organ transplants in 2010. This fact alone demonstrates the USA is facing an organ shortage crisis. Added to this, there is strong evidence that the organs made available are not being used efficiently, with 20 % of them going unused (for kidneys). It is tempting to investigate how new allocation policies could be implemented, but it would be more prudent to first understand the structure of the organ donation system in the USA. In spite of availability of data on transplants, to our knowledge no proper analysis has been done using the available data. This paper looks at organ transplantation data and what its structure may reveal about the allocation process currently in place. In order to structure the data, we used techniques from network sciences to build a network of locations (henceforth called a geographical social network, GSN) representing all transplants in the USA since 1987—locations represent states or zipcodes in the USA. This social structure is then analyzed using techniques from network sciences to bring clarity to the organ donation process. One of the main items in organ donation policies is the issue of locality which argues that allocation mechanisms should try to prioritize patients who are near the location where the organ became available. This is an important issue because the longer the organ takes to be transplanted the worse its quality. We show that network science techniques may shed some light on this process and demonstrate inconsistencies across different organs.

AB - As of December 2011, 110,629 Americans are waiting for an organ transplant and yet only 28,664 people received organ transplants in 2010. This fact alone demonstrates the USA is facing an organ shortage crisis. Added to this, there is strong evidence that the organs made available are not being used efficiently, with 20 % of them going unused (for kidneys). It is tempting to investigate how new allocation policies could be implemented, but it would be more prudent to first understand the structure of the organ donation system in the USA. In spite of availability of data on transplants, to our knowledge no proper analysis has been done using the available data. This paper looks at organ transplantation data and what its structure may reveal about the allocation process currently in place. In order to structure the data, we used techniques from network sciences to build a network of locations (henceforth called a geographical social network, GSN) representing all transplants in the USA since 1987—locations represent states or zipcodes in the USA. This social structure is then analyzed using techniques from network sciences to bring clarity to the organ donation process. One of the main items in organ donation policies is the issue of locality which argues that allocation mechanisms should try to prioritize patients who are near the location where the organ became available. This is an important issue because the longer the organ takes to be transplanted the worse its quality. We show that network science techniques may shed some light on this process and demonstrate inconsistencies across different organs.

KW - Data visualization

KW - Geographical social networks

KW - Network sciences

KW - Organ allocation

KW - Organ transplantation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947239161&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84947239161&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s13278-012-0089-1

DO - 10.1007/s13278-012-0089-1

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84947239161

VL - 3

SP - 457

EP - 473

JO - Social Network Analysis and Mining

JF - Social Network Analysis and Mining

SN - 1869-5450

IS - 3

ER -