Understanding Diagnosis, Therapy, and Prognosis

Helena Viveiros, Sarah Resendes, Tania A. Ferguson, Mohit Bhandari, Joel Matta

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter

Abstract

Orthopaedic surgeons wishing to practice evidence-based medicine (EBM) must integrate the best available research evidence with their own surgical expertise and their patient's goals and values. Critical appraisal of the best evidence requires an understanding of the hierarchy of research design, as well as asking three fundamental questions about study validity, results, and applicability to an individual's patients. Through this three-step process of critical appraisal surgeons are best informed to select appropriate diagnostic tests for making a sound diagnosis, selecting the best therapy, and determining the most likely prognosis for their patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationEvidence-Based Orthopedics
PublisherWiley-Blackwell
Pages17-24
Number of pages8
ISBN (Print)1405184760, 9781405184762
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 31 2011

Fingerprint

Evidence-Based Medicine
Routine Diagnostic Tests
Reproducibility of Results
Research Design
Therapeutics
Research
Orthopedic Surgeons
Surgeons

Keywords

  • Applicability
  • Diagnosis
  • Evidence-based medicine (EBM)
  • Orthopaedics
  • Prognosis
  • Results
  • Therapy
  • Validity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Viveiros, H., Resendes, S., Ferguson, T. A., Bhandari, M., & Matta, J. (2011). Understanding Diagnosis, Therapy, and Prognosis. In Evidence-Based Orthopedics (pp. 17-24). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444345100.ch4

Understanding Diagnosis, Therapy, and Prognosis. / Viveiros, Helena; Resendes, Sarah; Ferguson, Tania A.; Bhandari, Mohit; Matta, Joel.

Evidence-Based Orthopedics. Wiley-Blackwell, 2011. p. 17-24.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter

Viveiros, H, Resendes, S, Ferguson, TA, Bhandari, M & Matta, J 2011, Understanding Diagnosis, Therapy, and Prognosis. in Evidence-Based Orthopedics. Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 17-24. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444345100.ch4
Viveiros H, Resendes S, Ferguson TA, Bhandari M, Matta J. Understanding Diagnosis, Therapy, and Prognosis. In Evidence-Based Orthopedics. Wiley-Blackwell. 2011. p. 17-24 https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444345100.ch4
Viveiros, Helena ; Resendes, Sarah ; Ferguson, Tania A. ; Bhandari, Mohit ; Matta, Joel. / Understanding Diagnosis, Therapy, and Prognosis. Evidence-Based Orthopedics. Wiley-Blackwell, 2011. pp. 17-24
@inbook{60ca31ecfe01436db7b8d4e1c853c91c,
title = "Understanding Diagnosis, Therapy, and Prognosis",
abstract = "Orthopaedic surgeons wishing to practice evidence-based medicine (EBM) must integrate the best available research evidence with their own surgical expertise and their patient's goals and values. Critical appraisal of the best evidence requires an understanding of the hierarchy of research design, as well as asking three fundamental questions about study validity, results, and applicability to an individual's patients. Through this three-step process of critical appraisal surgeons are best informed to select appropriate diagnostic tests for making a sound diagnosis, selecting the best therapy, and determining the most likely prognosis for their patients.",
keywords = "Applicability, Diagnosis, Evidence-based medicine (EBM), Orthopaedics, Prognosis, Results, Therapy, Validity",
author = "Helena Viveiros and Sarah Resendes and Ferguson, {Tania A.} and Mohit Bhandari and Joel Matta",
year = "2011",
month = "10",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1002/9781444345100.ch4",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "1405184760",
pages = "17--24",
booktitle = "Evidence-Based Orthopedics",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Understanding Diagnosis, Therapy, and Prognosis

AU - Viveiros, Helena

AU - Resendes, Sarah

AU - Ferguson, Tania A.

AU - Bhandari, Mohit

AU - Matta, Joel

PY - 2011/10/31

Y1 - 2011/10/31

N2 - Orthopaedic surgeons wishing to practice evidence-based medicine (EBM) must integrate the best available research evidence with their own surgical expertise and their patient's goals and values. Critical appraisal of the best evidence requires an understanding of the hierarchy of research design, as well as asking three fundamental questions about study validity, results, and applicability to an individual's patients. Through this three-step process of critical appraisal surgeons are best informed to select appropriate diagnostic tests for making a sound diagnosis, selecting the best therapy, and determining the most likely prognosis for their patients.

AB - Orthopaedic surgeons wishing to practice evidence-based medicine (EBM) must integrate the best available research evidence with their own surgical expertise and their patient's goals and values. Critical appraisal of the best evidence requires an understanding of the hierarchy of research design, as well as asking three fundamental questions about study validity, results, and applicability to an individual's patients. Through this three-step process of critical appraisal surgeons are best informed to select appropriate diagnostic tests for making a sound diagnosis, selecting the best therapy, and determining the most likely prognosis for their patients.

KW - Applicability

KW - Diagnosis

KW - Evidence-based medicine (EBM)

KW - Orthopaedics

KW - Prognosis

KW - Results

KW - Therapy

KW - Validity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84885778945&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84885778945&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/9781444345100.ch4

DO - 10.1002/9781444345100.ch4

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84885778945

SN - 1405184760

SN - 9781405184762

SP - 17

EP - 24

BT - Evidence-Based Orthopedics

PB - Wiley-Blackwell

ER -

Access to Document