Undergraduate coursework in anatomy as a predictor of performance: Comparison between students taking a medical gross anatomy course of average length and a course shortened by curriculum reform

Cathryn A. Peterson, Richard P Tucker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The performance of students taking medical gross anatomy at the University of California at Davis during a 4-year period (1999-2002) was correlated with prior undergraduate anatomy coursework. Significant correlations were observed between class rank in medical anatomy and taking any undergraduate anatomy as well as the total number of undergraduate anatomy units (P < 0.01). Taking human gross anatomy and an anatomy laboratory course were significantly correlated with medical anatomy class rank (P < 0.01) as were grades in human anatomy, comparative vertebrate anatomy and anatomy laboratory courses (P < 0.05). The medical anatomy course offered in 1999-2000 was 172 hr long, and the course offered in 2001-2002 was 135 hr long, with most of the difference made by decreasing lecture time while sparing the dissection laboratory. The reduction in course length was the consequence of a curriculum-wide cap in weekly contact hours. In the 172-hr medical anatomy course there were significant correlations between the students who took undergraduate anatomy and both class rank and the score on the final examination (P < 0.01). These correlations did not exist for the 135-hr course. This may be explained by previous anatomy experiences helping students learn from lecture more than from dissection laboratory, as well as the extra study time available to students in the reformed medical curriculum. Pre-medical students and health science advisors need to consider that the benefits of taking anatomy as an undergraduate may be dependent on the configuration of a medical school's curriculum.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)540-547
Number of pages8
JournalClinical Anatomy
Volume18
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 2005

Fingerprint

Curriculum
Anatomy
Students
Medical Students
Dissection
Comparative Anatomy
Medical Schools
Vertebrates

Keywords

  • Comparative vertebrate anatomy
  • Dissection laboratory
  • Kinesiology
  • Premedical education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anatomy

Cite this

@article{0f48a657a3924f9d85f2fb026ec751c1,
title = "Undergraduate coursework in anatomy as a predictor of performance: Comparison between students taking a medical gross anatomy course of average length and a course shortened by curriculum reform",
abstract = "The performance of students taking medical gross anatomy at the University of California at Davis during a 4-year period (1999-2002) was correlated with prior undergraduate anatomy coursework. Significant correlations were observed between class rank in medical anatomy and taking any undergraduate anatomy as well as the total number of undergraduate anatomy units (P < 0.01). Taking human gross anatomy and an anatomy laboratory course were significantly correlated with medical anatomy class rank (P < 0.01) as were grades in human anatomy, comparative vertebrate anatomy and anatomy laboratory courses (P < 0.05). The medical anatomy course offered in 1999-2000 was 172 hr long, and the course offered in 2001-2002 was 135 hr long, with most of the difference made by decreasing lecture time while sparing the dissection laboratory. The reduction in course length was the consequence of a curriculum-wide cap in weekly contact hours. In the 172-hr medical anatomy course there were significant correlations between the students who took undergraduate anatomy and both class rank and the score on the final examination (P < 0.01). These correlations did not exist for the 135-hr course. This may be explained by previous anatomy experiences helping students learn from lecture more than from dissection laboratory, as well as the extra study time available to students in the reformed medical curriculum. Pre-medical students and health science advisors need to consider that the benefits of taking anatomy as an undergraduate may be dependent on the configuration of a medical school's curriculum.",
keywords = "Comparative vertebrate anatomy, Dissection laboratory, Kinesiology, Premedical education",
author = "Peterson, {Cathryn A.} and Tucker, {Richard P}",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1002/ca.20154",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "540--547",
journal = "Clinical Anatomy",
issn = "0897-3806",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Undergraduate coursework in anatomy as a predictor of performance

T2 - Comparison between students taking a medical gross anatomy course of average length and a course shortened by curriculum reform

AU - Peterson, Cathryn A.

AU - Tucker, Richard P

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - The performance of students taking medical gross anatomy at the University of California at Davis during a 4-year period (1999-2002) was correlated with prior undergraduate anatomy coursework. Significant correlations were observed between class rank in medical anatomy and taking any undergraduate anatomy as well as the total number of undergraduate anatomy units (P < 0.01). Taking human gross anatomy and an anatomy laboratory course were significantly correlated with medical anatomy class rank (P < 0.01) as were grades in human anatomy, comparative vertebrate anatomy and anatomy laboratory courses (P < 0.05). The medical anatomy course offered in 1999-2000 was 172 hr long, and the course offered in 2001-2002 was 135 hr long, with most of the difference made by decreasing lecture time while sparing the dissection laboratory. The reduction in course length was the consequence of a curriculum-wide cap in weekly contact hours. In the 172-hr medical anatomy course there were significant correlations between the students who took undergraduate anatomy and both class rank and the score on the final examination (P < 0.01). These correlations did not exist for the 135-hr course. This may be explained by previous anatomy experiences helping students learn from lecture more than from dissection laboratory, as well as the extra study time available to students in the reformed medical curriculum. Pre-medical students and health science advisors need to consider that the benefits of taking anatomy as an undergraduate may be dependent on the configuration of a medical school's curriculum.

AB - The performance of students taking medical gross anatomy at the University of California at Davis during a 4-year period (1999-2002) was correlated with prior undergraduate anatomy coursework. Significant correlations were observed between class rank in medical anatomy and taking any undergraduate anatomy as well as the total number of undergraduate anatomy units (P < 0.01). Taking human gross anatomy and an anatomy laboratory course were significantly correlated with medical anatomy class rank (P < 0.01) as were grades in human anatomy, comparative vertebrate anatomy and anatomy laboratory courses (P < 0.05). The medical anatomy course offered in 1999-2000 was 172 hr long, and the course offered in 2001-2002 was 135 hr long, with most of the difference made by decreasing lecture time while sparing the dissection laboratory. The reduction in course length was the consequence of a curriculum-wide cap in weekly contact hours. In the 172-hr medical anatomy course there were significant correlations between the students who took undergraduate anatomy and both class rank and the score on the final examination (P < 0.01). These correlations did not exist for the 135-hr course. This may be explained by previous anatomy experiences helping students learn from lecture more than from dissection laboratory, as well as the extra study time available to students in the reformed medical curriculum. Pre-medical students and health science advisors need to consider that the benefits of taking anatomy as an undergraduate may be dependent on the configuration of a medical school's curriculum.

KW - Comparative vertebrate anatomy

KW - Dissection laboratory

KW - Kinesiology

KW - Premedical education

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=26444544534&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=26444544534&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ca.20154

DO - 10.1002/ca.20154

M3 - Article

C2 - 16015636

AN - SCOPUS:26444544534

VL - 18

SP - 540

EP - 547

JO - Clinical Anatomy

JF - Clinical Anatomy

SN - 0897-3806

IS - 7

ER -