Ultrasonography and transillumination for uveal melanoma localisation in proton beam treatment planning

Jonathan E. Lu, R. Joel Welch, Kavita K. Mishra, Inder K. Daftari, Susanna Soon Chun Park

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background/Objective: The success of proton beam treatment (PBT) in uveal melanoma depends in part on the accuracy of tumour localisation. This study determined if using ultrasonography (US) to measure the distance between tumour margin and tantalum ring (DTR) in PBT planning improves local treatment success when compared with using intraoperative transillumination (TI) alone. Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients with uveal melanoma treated at one centre between January 2006 and June 2017 with ≥12-month follow-up (or until treatment failure). Local tumour control was compared among study groups based on methods for measuring DTR: Group 1 (TI alone), Group 2A (postoperative US alone) and Group 2B (combination). Results: Fifty-four eyes (54 patients) with uveal melanomas were included: Group 1 (22 eyes, 41%), Group 2A (11 eyes, 20%) and Group 2B (21 eyes, 39%). Mean age at diagnosis was 64 years [median 66 years, range 23–86 years]. Fifty tumours (93%) involved the choroid, while four involved the ciliary body (7%). In Group 2B, PBT treatment was based on the DTR obtained using US; DTR differed between TI and US by ≥1 mm for 25 rings in 16 eyes and ≥2 mm for 12 rings in 7 eyes. Five-year Kaplan–Meier estimate revealed a difference in local treatment success between Groups 1 and 2, (0.82 vs. 1.0, p = 0.02) with no difference in overall survival estimate, (0.85 vs. 0.83, p = 0.8). Conclusions: US can be used to measure DTR in PBT planning for uveal melanoma. This may improve accuracy of tumour localisation and improve local treatment success.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalEye (Basingstoke)
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Transillumination
Protons
Ultrasonography
Therapeutics
Neoplasms
Tantalum
Ciliary Body
Choroid
Uveal melanoma
Treatment Failure
Survival

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems

Cite this

Ultrasonography and transillumination for uveal melanoma localisation in proton beam treatment planning. / Lu, Jonathan E.; Welch, R. Joel; Mishra, Kavita K.; Daftari, Inder K.; Park, Susanna Soon Chun.

In: Eye (Basingstoke), 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a1dcf8f16521400994c86df8b0e2db1e,
title = "Ultrasonography and transillumination for uveal melanoma localisation in proton beam treatment planning",
abstract = "Background/Objective: The success of proton beam treatment (PBT) in uveal melanoma depends in part on the accuracy of tumour localisation. This study determined if using ultrasonography (US) to measure the distance between tumour margin and tantalum ring (DTR) in PBT planning improves local treatment success when compared with using intraoperative transillumination (TI) alone. Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients with uveal melanoma treated at one centre between January 2006 and June 2017 with ≥12-month follow-up (or until treatment failure). Local tumour control was compared among study groups based on methods for measuring DTR: Group 1 (TI alone), Group 2A (postoperative US alone) and Group 2B (combination). Results: Fifty-four eyes (54 patients) with uveal melanomas were included: Group 1 (22 eyes, 41{\%}), Group 2A (11 eyes, 20{\%}) and Group 2B (21 eyes, 39{\%}). Mean age at diagnosis was 64 years [median 66 years, range 23–86 years]. Fifty tumours (93{\%}) involved the choroid, while four involved the ciliary body (7{\%}). In Group 2B, PBT treatment was based on the DTR obtained using US; DTR differed between TI and US by ≥1 mm for 25 rings in 16 eyes and ≥2 mm for 12 rings in 7 eyes. Five-year Kaplan–Meier estimate revealed a difference in local treatment success between Groups 1 and 2, (0.82 vs. 1.0, p = 0.02) with no difference in overall survival estimate, (0.85 vs. 0.83, p = 0.8). Conclusions: US can be used to measure DTR in PBT planning for uveal melanoma. This may improve accuracy of tumour localisation and improve local treatment success.",
author = "Lu, {Jonathan E.} and Welch, {R. Joel} and Mishra, {Kavita K.} and Daftari, {Inder K.} and Park, {Susanna Soon Chun}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1038/s41433-019-0512-1",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Eye (Basingstoke)",
issn = "0950-222X",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ultrasonography and transillumination for uveal melanoma localisation in proton beam treatment planning

AU - Lu, Jonathan E.

AU - Welch, R. Joel

AU - Mishra, Kavita K.

AU - Daftari, Inder K.

AU - Park, Susanna Soon Chun

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Background/Objective: The success of proton beam treatment (PBT) in uveal melanoma depends in part on the accuracy of tumour localisation. This study determined if using ultrasonography (US) to measure the distance between tumour margin and tantalum ring (DTR) in PBT planning improves local treatment success when compared with using intraoperative transillumination (TI) alone. Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients with uveal melanoma treated at one centre between January 2006 and June 2017 with ≥12-month follow-up (or until treatment failure). Local tumour control was compared among study groups based on methods for measuring DTR: Group 1 (TI alone), Group 2A (postoperative US alone) and Group 2B (combination). Results: Fifty-four eyes (54 patients) with uveal melanomas were included: Group 1 (22 eyes, 41%), Group 2A (11 eyes, 20%) and Group 2B (21 eyes, 39%). Mean age at diagnosis was 64 years [median 66 years, range 23–86 years]. Fifty tumours (93%) involved the choroid, while four involved the ciliary body (7%). In Group 2B, PBT treatment was based on the DTR obtained using US; DTR differed between TI and US by ≥1 mm for 25 rings in 16 eyes and ≥2 mm for 12 rings in 7 eyes. Five-year Kaplan–Meier estimate revealed a difference in local treatment success between Groups 1 and 2, (0.82 vs. 1.0, p = 0.02) with no difference in overall survival estimate, (0.85 vs. 0.83, p = 0.8). Conclusions: US can be used to measure DTR in PBT planning for uveal melanoma. This may improve accuracy of tumour localisation and improve local treatment success.

AB - Background/Objective: The success of proton beam treatment (PBT) in uveal melanoma depends in part on the accuracy of tumour localisation. This study determined if using ultrasonography (US) to measure the distance between tumour margin and tantalum ring (DTR) in PBT planning improves local treatment success when compared with using intraoperative transillumination (TI) alone. Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients with uveal melanoma treated at one centre between January 2006 and June 2017 with ≥12-month follow-up (or until treatment failure). Local tumour control was compared among study groups based on methods for measuring DTR: Group 1 (TI alone), Group 2A (postoperative US alone) and Group 2B (combination). Results: Fifty-four eyes (54 patients) with uveal melanomas were included: Group 1 (22 eyes, 41%), Group 2A (11 eyes, 20%) and Group 2B (21 eyes, 39%). Mean age at diagnosis was 64 years [median 66 years, range 23–86 years]. Fifty tumours (93%) involved the choroid, while four involved the ciliary body (7%). In Group 2B, PBT treatment was based on the DTR obtained using US; DTR differed between TI and US by ≥1 mm for 25 rings in 16 eyes and ≥2 mm for 12 rings in 7 eyes. Five-year Kaplan–Meier estimate revealed a difference in local treatment success between Groups 1 and 2, (0.82 vs. 1.0, p = 0.02) with no difference in overall survival estimate, (0.85 vs. 0.83, p = 0.8). Conclusions: US can be used to measure DTR in PBT planning for uveal melanoma. This may improve accuracy of tumour localisation and improve local treatment success.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068484797&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85068484797&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/s41433-019-0512-1

DO - 10.1038/s41433-019-0512-1

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85068484797

JO - Eye (Basingstoke)

JF - Eye (Basingstoke)

SN - 0950-222X

ER -