Ultrasonographic evaluation of diaphragmatic motion

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

154 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. To evaluate the technical feasibility and utility of ultrasonography in the study of diaphragmatic motion at our institution. Methods. The study consisted of 2 parts. For part I, in 23 volunteers we performed 23 studies on 46 hemidiaphragms with excursions documented on M-mode ultrasonography. For part II, in 22 patients we performed 52 studies in 102 hemidiaphragms. In 50 studies both hemidiaphragms were studied, and in another 2 studies only 1 hemidiaphragm was studied. Patients' ages ranged from birth to 66 years (mean, 23 years). There were 16 male and 6 female patients. Indications for the study were (1) suggestion of paralysis of the diaphragm (n = 22); (2) if the diaphragm was already known to be paralyzed, for evaluation of response to phrenic nerve or pacer stimulation (n = 9); and (3) follow-up of previous findings (n = 21). Patients were examined in the supine position in the longitudinal semicoronal plane from a subcostal or low intercostal approach. Motion was documented with real-time ultrasonography and measured with M-mode ultrasonography. Results. Of the 102 clinical hemidiaphragms studied, findings included normal motion (n = 42), decreased motion (n = 22), no motion (n = 6), paradoxical motion (n = 10), positive pacer response (n = 13), negative pacer response (n = 2), positive phrenic stimulation (n = 6), and negative phrenic stimulation (n = 1). There were no failures of visualization. Conclusions. Ultrasonography proved feasible and useful in evaluating diaphragmatic motion. In our practice it has replaced fluoroscopy. Ultrasonography has advantages over traditional fluoroscopy, including portability, lack of ionizing radiation, visualization of structures of the thoracic bases and upper abdomen, and the ability to quantify diaphragmatic motion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)597-604
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Ultrasound in Medicine
Volume20
Issue number6
StatePublished - 2001

Fingerprint

Ultrasonography
evaluation
Diaphragm
stimulation
fluoroscopy
Fluoroscopy
diaphragms
paralysis
supine position
abdomen
Phrenic Nerve
Supine Position
nerves
Ionizing Radiation
Paralysis
ionizing radiation
Abdomen
suggestion
Volunteers
indication

Keywords

  • Diaphragm
  • Diaphragm, abnormalities
  • Diaphragm, ultrasonography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics

Cite this

Ultrasonographic evaluation of diaphragmatic motion. / Gerscovich, Eugenio O; Cronan, M.; McGahan, John P; Jain, Kiran A; Jones, C. D.; McDonald, Craig M.

In: Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol. 20, No. 6, 2001, p. 597-604.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{06a32e4a43154313ad3c3a7a63f69756,
title = "Ultrasonographic evaluation of diaphragmatic motion",
abstract = "Objective. To evaluate the technical feasibility and utility of ultrasonography in the study of diaphragmatic motion at our institution. Methods. The study consisted of 2 parts. For part I, in 23 volunteers we performed 23 studies on 46 hemidiaphragms with excursions documented on M-mode ultrasonography. For part II, in 22 patients we performed 52 studies in 102 hemidiaphragms. In 50 studies both hemidiaphragms were studied, and in another 2 studies only 1 hemidiaphragm was studied. Patients' ages ranged from birth to 66 years (mean, 23 years). There were 16 male and 6 female patients. Indications for the study were (1) suggestion of paralysis of the diaphragm (n = 22); (2) if the diaphragm was already known to be paralyzed, for evaluation of response to phrenic nerve or pacer stimulation (n = 9); and (3) follow-up of previous findings (n = 21). Patients were examined in the supine position in the longitudinal semicoronal plane from a subcostal or low intercostal approach. Motion was documented with real-time ultrasonography and measured with M-mode ultrasonography. Results. Of the 102 clinical hemidiaphragms studied, findings included normal motion (n = 42), decreased motion (n = 22), no motion (n = 6), paradoxical motion (n = 10), positive pacer response (n = 13), negative pacer response (n = 2), positive phrenic stimulation (n = 6), and negative phrenic stimulation (n = 1). There were no failures of visualization. Conclusions. Ultrasonography proved feasible and useful in evaluating diaphragmatic motion. In our practice it has replaced fluoroscopy. Ultrasonography has advantages over traditional fluoroscopy, including portability, lack of ionizing radiation, visualization of structures of the thoracic bases and upper abdomen, and the ability to quantify diaphragmatic motion.",
keywords = "Diaphragm, Diaphragm, abnormalities, Diaphragm, ultrasonography",
author = "Gerscovich, {Eugenio O} and M. Cronan and McGahan, {John P} and Jain, {Kiran A} and Jones, {C. D.} and McDonald, {Craig M}",
year = "2001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "597--604",
journal = "Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine",
issn = "0278-4297",
publisher = "American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ultrasonographic evaluation of diaphragmatic motion

AU - Gerscovich, Eugenio O

AU - Cronan, M.

AU - McGahan, John P

AU - Jain, Kiran A

AU - Jones, C. D.

AU - McDonald, Craig M

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Objective. To evaluate the technical feasibility and utility of ultrasonography in the study of diaphragmatic motion at our institution. Methods. The study consisted of 2 parts. For part I, in 23 volunteers we performed 23 studies on 46 hemidiaphragms with excursions documented on M-mode ultrasonography. For part II, in 22 patients we performed 52 studies in 102 hemidiaphragms. In 50 studies both hemidiaphragms were studied, and in another 2 studies only 1 hemidiaphragm was studied. Patients' ages ranged from birth to 66 years (mean, 23 years). There were 16 male and 6 female patients. Indications for the study were (1) suggestion of paralysis of the diaphragm (n = 22); (2) if the diaphragm was already known to be paralyzed, for evaluation of response to phrenic nerve or pacer stimulation (n = 9); and (3) follow-up of previous findings (n = 21). Patients were examined in the supine position in the longitudinal semicoronal plane from a subcostal or low intercostal approach. Motion was documented with real-time ultrasonography and measured with M-mode ultrasonography. Results. Of the 102 clinical hemidiaphragms studied, findings included normal motion (n = 42), decreased motion (n = 22), no motion (n = 6), paradoxical motion (n = 10), positive pacer response (n = 13), negative pacer response (n = 2), positive phrenic stimulation (n = 6), and negative phrenic stimulation (n = 1). There were no failures of visualization. Conclusions. Ultrasonography proved feasible and useful in evaluating diaphragmatic motion. In our practice it has replaced fluoroscopy. Ultrasonography has advantages over traditional fluoroscopy, including portability, lack of ionizing radiation, visualization of structures of the thoracic bases and upper abdomen, and the ability to quantify diaphragmatic motion.

AB - Objective. To evaluate the technical feasibility and utility of ultrasonography in the study of diaphragmatic motion at our institution. Methods. The study consisted of 2 parts. For part I, in 23 volunteers we performed 23 studies on 46 hemidiaphragms with excursions documented on M-mode ultrasonography. For part II, in 22 patients we performed 52 studies in 102 hemidiaphragms. In 50 studies both hemidiaphragms were studied, and in another 2 studies only 1 hemidiaphragm was studied. Patients' ages ranged from birth to 66 years (mean, 23 years). There were 16 male and 6 female patients. Indications for the study were (1) suggestion of paralysis of the diaphragm (n = 22); (2) if the diaphragm was already known to be paralyzed, for evaluation of response to phrenic nerve or pacer stimulation (n = 9); and (3) follow-up of previous findings (n = 21). Patients were examined in the supine position in the longitudinal semicoronal plane from a subcostal or low intercostal approach. Motion was documented with real-time ultrasonography and measured with M-mode ultrasonography. Results. Of the 102 clinical hemidiaphragms studied, findings included normal motion (n = 42), decreased motion (n = 22), no motion (n = 6), paradoxical motion (n = 10), positive pacer response (n = 13), negative pacer response (n = 2), positive phrenic stimulation (n = 6), and negative phrenic stimulation (n = 1). There were no failures of visualization. Conclusions. Ultrasonography proved feasible and useful in evaluating diaphragmatic motion. In our practice it has replaced fluoroscopy. Ultrasonography has advantages over traditional fluoroscopy, including portability, lack of ionizing radiation, visualization of structures of the thoracic bases and upper abdomen, and the ability to quantify diaphragmatic motion.

KW - Diaphragm

KW - Diaphragm, abnormalities

KW - Diaphragm, ultrasonography

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034981740&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034981740&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 597

EP - 604

JO - Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine

JF - Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine

SN - 0278-4297

IS - 6

ER -