Ultrasonic parathyroid localisation in previously operated patients

Adrian G. Krudy, Thomas H. Shawker, John L. Doppman, Klara Horvath, Philip D Schneider, Jeffrey A. Norton, Stephen J. Marx, Allen M. Spiegel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Sixty-two patients with hyperparathyroidism and failed prior neck surgery were examined by ultrasound before reoperation to localise abnormally enlarged glands. If mediastinal lesions are excluded, a total of 57 glands >5 mm in size were removed from 48 patients. Ultrasound demonstrated only 18 of these for a true positive rate of 32%. There were 39/57 (68%) false negatives. In addition, there were 16 false positives. In our experience, the detection rate of ultrasound for enlarged parathyroid glands in patients with failed surgery is significantly less than that reported in previously unoperated patients (73%), or in the limited number of reported cases of patients with previous operations (75%). Our high false negative rate is probably partially due to the large number of posteriorly located small glands which cannot be adequately visualised by ultrasound. Nevertheless, because of its non-invasive nature, low cost and ready availability, ultrasound should be utilised as an initial screening procedure in patients with failed previous surgery.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)113-118
Number of pages6
JournalClinical Radiology
Volume35
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1984
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Ultrasonics
Parathyroid Glands
Hyperparathyroidism
Reoperation
Neck
Costs and Cost Analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Krudy, A. G., Shawker, T. H., Doppman, J. L., Horvath, K., Schneider, P. D., Norton, J. A., ... Spiegel, A. M. (1984). Ultrasonic parathyroid localisation in previously operated patients. Clinical Radiology, 35(2), 113-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-9260(84)80007-0

Ultrasonic parathyroid localisation in previously operated patients. / Krudy, Adrian G.; Shawker, Thomas H.; Doppman, John L.; Horvath, Klara; Schneider, Philip D; Norton, Jeffrey A.; Marx, Stephen J.; Spiegel, Allen M.

In: Clinical Radiology, Vol. 35, No. 2, 1984, p. 113-118.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Krudy, AG, Shawker, TH, Doppman, JL, Horvath, K, Schneider, PD, Norton, JA, Marx, SJ & Spiegel, AM 1984, 'Ultrasonic parathyroid localisation in previously operated patients', Clinical Radiology, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 113-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-9260(84)80007-0
Krudy, Adrian G. ; Shawker, Thomas H. ; Doppman, John L. ; Horvath, Klara ; Schneider, Philip D ; Norton, Jeffrey A. ; Marx, Stephen J. ; Spiegel, Allen M. / Ultrasonic parathyroid localisation in previously operated patients. In: Clinical Radiology. 1984 ; Vol. 35, No. 2. pp. 113-118.
@article{d07da56943d744a197b7622d3b8c3693,
title = "Ultrasonic parathyroid localisation in previously operated patients",
abstract = "Sixty-two patients with hyperparathyroidism and failed prior neck surgery were examined by ultrasound before reoperation to localise abnormally enlarged glands. If mediastinal lesions are excluded, a total of 57 glands >5 mm in size were removed from 48 patients. Ultrasound demonstrated only 18 of these for a true positive rate of 32{\%}. There were 39/57 (68{\%}) false negatives. In addition, there were 16 false positives. In our experience, the detection rate of ultrasound for enlarged parathyroid glands in patients with failed surgery is significantly less than that reported in previously unoperated patients (73{\%}), or in the limited number of reported cases of patients with previous operations (75{\%}). Our high false negative rate is probably partially due to the large number of posteriorly located small glands which cannot be adequately visualised by ultrasound. Nevertheless, because of its non-invasive nature, low cost and ready availability, ultrasound should be utilised as an initial screening procedure in patients with failed previous surgery.",
author = "Krudy, {Adrian G.} and Shawker, {Thomas H.} and Doppman, {John L.} and Klara Horvath and Schneider, {Philip D} and Norton, {Jeffrey A.} and Marx, {Stephen J.} and Spiegel, {Allen M.}",
year = "1984",
doi = "10.1016/S0009-9260(84)80007-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "113--118",
journal = "Clinical Radiology",
issn = "0009-9260",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ultrasonic parathyroid localisation in previously operated patients

AU - Krudy, Adrian G.

AU - Shawker, Thomas H.

AU - Doppman, John L.

AU - Horvath, Klara

AU - Schneider, Philip D

AU - Norton, Jeffrey A.

AU - Marx, Stephen J.

AU - Spiegel, Allen M.

PY - 1984

Y1 - 1984

N2 - Sixty-two patients with hyperparathyroidism and failed prior neck surgery were examined by ultrasound before reoperation to localise abnormally enlarged glands. If mediastinal lesions are excluded, a total of 57 glands >5 mm in size were removed from 48 patients. Ultrasound demonstrated only 18 of these for a true positive rate of 32%. There were 39/57 (68%) false negatives. In addition, there were 16 false positives. In our experience, the detection rate of ultrasound for enlarged parathyroid glands in patients with failed surgery is significantly less than that reported in previously unoperated patients (73%), or in the limited number of reported cases of patients with previous operations (75%). Our high false negative rate is probably partially due to the large number of posteriorly located small glands which cannot be adequately visualised by ultrasound. Nevertheless, because of its non-invasive nature, low cost and ready availability, ultrasound should be utilised as an initial screening procedure in patients with failed previous surgery.

AB - Sixty-two patients with hyperparathyroidism and failed prior neck surgery were examined by ultrasound before reoperation to localise abnormally enlarged glands. If mediastinal lesions are excluded, a total of 57 glands >5 mm in size were removed from 48 patients. Ultrasound demonstrated only 18 of these for a true positive rate of 32%. There were 39/57 (68%) false negatives. In addition, there were 16 false positives. In our experience, the detection rate of ultrasound for enlarged parathyroid glands in patients with failed surgery is significantly less than that reported in previously unoperated patients (73%), or in the limited number of reported cases of patients with previous operations (75%). Our high false negative rate is probably partially due to the large number of posteriorly located small glands which cannot be adequately visualised by ultrasound. Nevertheless, because of its non-invasive nature, low cost and ready availability, ultrasound should be utilised as an initial screening procedure in patients with failed previous surgery.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0021326812&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0021326812&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0009-9260(84)80007-0

DO - 10.1016/S0009-9260(84)80007-0

M3 - Article

C2 - 6697653

AN - SCOPUS:0021326812

VL - 35

SP - 113

EP - 118

JO - Clinical Radiology

JF - Clinical Radiology

SN - 0009-9260

IS - 2

ER -