TU‐C‐BRB‐05: Development of a Software Framework for Quality Control and Optimization of a Paperless Radiation Therapy Process

S. Brain, Sonja Dieterich, D. ho, E. Mok, K. Horst, D. Hristov

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: To implement a software framework for quality control and optimization of a paperless radiation therapy process. Methods: After analyzing the radiation therapy process as implemented using a conventional paper chart, we re‐implemented it in a paperless environment using workflow mechanisms available in Radiation Oncology Information System (ARIA, Varian Medical Systems), such as on‐line Appointments, Tasks, Dynamic Word Documents, and Checklists. In order to ensure that the software‐based procedure steps of the paperless process were being adhered to, we have developed a collection of software modules which queries the SQL‐compliant database that underlies ARIA, analyses the results, and alerts users, mainly via emails, of the existence of any procedures or documentation they may not have completed.Results: All treatment plans for our conventional accelerators are now developed in a paperless environment. Currently, there are a total of 10 software modules, written in perl and SQL and comprising around 17,000 lines of code, reporting on specific aspects of the paperless process, such as treatment consent presence, prescription approval, target volume approval, plan approval, pre‐treatment check execution and others. The use of software control modules, which execute daily, weekly or monthly, has resulted in a several‐fold decrease in the number of process errors. The email alerts from the reporting software have become an essential part of the workflow environment in the department. These have contributed to the general acceptance of the paperless process, despite the added computer‐based effort it involves. Conclusions: A paperless radiation therapy process opens up the possibility for automated monitoring and control of workflow steps essential for maintaining and improving patient safety. We have demonstrated that the implementation of software tools to perform this function results in significant, quantifiable process improvement.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Number of pages1
JournalMedical Physics
Volume38
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Quality Control
Radiotherapy
Software
Workflow
Radiation Oncology
Patient Safety
Checklist
Information Systems
Documentation
Prescriptions
Appointments and Schedules
Databases
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

TU‐C‐BRB‐05 : Development of a Software Framework for Quality Control and Optimization of a Paperless Radiation Therapy Process. / Brain, S.; Dieterich, Sonja; ho, D.; Mok, E.; Horst, K.; Hristov, D.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 38, No. 6, 2011.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9d736f72418c4743a8bdbe09e9acf15a,
title = "TU‐C‐BRB‐05: Development of a Software Framework for Quality Control and Optimization of a Paperless Radiation Therapy Process",
abstract = "Purpose: To implement a software framework for quality control and optimization of a paperless radiation therapy process. Methods: After analyzing the radiation therapy process as implemented using a conventional paper chart, we re‐implemented it in a paperless environment using workflow mechanisms available in Radiation Oncology Information System (ARIA, Varian Medical Systems), such as on‐line Appointments, Tasks, Dynamic Word Documents, and Checklists. In order to ensure that the software‐based procedure steps of the paperless process were being adhered to, we have developed a collection of software modules which queries the SQL‐compliant database that underlies ARIA, analyses the results, and alerts users, mainly via emails, of the existence of any procedures or documentation they may not have completed.Results: All treatment plans for our conventional accelerators are now developed in a paperless environment. Currently, there are a total of 10 software modules, written in perl and SQL and comprising around 17,000 lines of code, reporting on specific aspects of the paperless process, such as treatment consent presence, prescription approval, target volume approval, plan approval, pre‐treatment check execution and others. The use of software control modules, which execute daily, weekly or monthly, has resulted in a several‐fold decrease in the number of process errors. The email alerts from the reporting software have become an essential part of the workflow environment in the department. These have contributed to the general acceptance of the paperless process, despite the added computer‐based effort it involves. Conclusions: A paperless radiation therapy process opens up the possibility for automated monitoring and control of workflow steps essential for maintaining and improving patient safety. We have demonstrated that the implementation of software tools to perform this function results in significant, quantifiable process improvement.",
author = "S. Brain and Sonja Dieterich and D. ho and E. Mok and K. Horst and D. Hristov",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1118/1.3613125",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - TU‐C‐BRB‐05

T2 - Development of a Software Framework for Quality Control and Optimization of a Paperless Radiation Therapy Process

AU - Brain, S.

AU - Dieterich, Sonja

AU - ho, D.

AU - Mok, E.

AU - Horst, K.

AU - Hristov, D.

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Purpose: To implement a software framework for quality control and optimization of a paperless radiation therapy process. Methods: After analyzing the radiation therapy process as implemented using a conventional paper chart, we re‐implemented it in a paperless environment using workflow mechanisms available in Radiation Oncology Information System (ARIA, Varian Medical Systems), such as on‐line Appointments, Tasks, Dynamic Word Documents, and Checklists. In order to ensure that the software‐based procedure steps of the paperless process were being adhered to, we have developed a collection of software modules which queries the SQL‐compliant database that underlies ARIA, analyses the results, and alerts users, mainly via emails, of the existence of any procedures or documentation they may not have completed.Results: All treatment plans for our conventional accelerators are now developed in a paperless environment. Currently, there are a total of 10 software modules, written in perl and SQL and comprising around 17,000 lines of code, reporting on specific aspects of the paperless process, such as treatment consent presence, prescription approval, target volume approval, plan approval, pre‐treatment check execution and others. The use of software control modules, which execute daily, weekly or monthly, has resulted in a several‐fold decrease in the number of process errors. The email alerts from the reporting software have become an essential part of the workflow environment in the department. These have contributed to the general acceptance of the paperless process, despite the added computer‐based effort it involves. Conclusions: A paperless radiation therapy process opens up the possibility for automated monitoring and control of workflow steps essential for maintaining and improving patient safety. We have demonstrated that the implementation of software tools to perform this function results in significant, quantifiable process improvement.

AB - Purpose: To implement a software framework for quality control and optimization of a paperless radiation therapy process. Methods: After analyzing the radiation therapy process as implemented using a conventional paper chart, we re‐implemented it in a paperless environment using workflow mechanisms available in Radiation Oncology Information System (ARIA, Varian Medical Systems), such as on‐line Appointments, Tasks, Dynamic Word Documents, and Checklists. In order to ensure that the software‐based procedure steps of the paperless process were being adhered to, we have developed a collection of software modules which queries the SQL‐compliant database that underlies ARIA, analyses the results, and alerts users, mainly via emails, of the existence of any procedures or documentation they may not have completed.Results: All treatment plans for our conventional accelerators are now developed in a paperless environment. Currently, there are a total of 10 software modules, written in perl and SQL and comprising around 17,000 lines of code, reporting on specific aspects of the paperless process, such as treatment consent presence, prescription approval, target volume approval, plan approval, pre‐treatment check execution and others. The use of software control modules, which execute daily, weekly or monthly, has resulted in a several‐fold decrease in the number of process errors. The email alerts from the reporting software have become an essential part of the workflow environment in the department. These have contributed to the general acceptance of the paperless process, despite the added computer‐based effort it involves. Conclusions: A paperless radiation therapy process opens up the possibility for automated monitoring and control of workflow steps essential for maintaining and improving patient safety. We have demonstrated that the implementation of software tools to perform this function results in significant, quantifiable process improvement.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024821348&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85024821348&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.3613125

DO - 10.1118/1.3613125

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85024821348

VL - 38

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 6

ER -