Treatment outcomes for squamous intraepithelial lesions

James Nuovo, Joy Melnikow, A. R. Willan, B. K S Chan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

82 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To assess the effectiveness of cone biopsy, cryotherapy, laser ablation and the loop electrosurgical procedure in the treatment of squamous intraepithelial lesions. Method: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials in subjects who underwent treatment of low- and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions with these modalities. Main outcome measures included the following: percent resolution and persistence of a lesion and notable complications for each procedure. Result: Pooled rates of resolution for low-grade, high-grade, or combined squamous intraepithelial lesions were similar across the different treatment modalities (range 85.2-94.7%), with substantial overlap among the 95% confidence intervals. Significant hemorrhage occurred most frequently in subjects who received cone biopsy (4.6%) (95% CI: 2.15, 6.99), followed by laser ablation (1.75%) (95% CI: 0.70, 2.81), and LEEP (1.35%) (95% CI: 0.24, 2.47). No hemorrhages were reported among subjects who received cryotherapy. Study sample sizes were relatively small. There were no reported cases of progression to invasive cancer, but duration of follow-up (median follow-up time for all eligible studies=12 months) was not sufficient to evaluate long-term outcomes. Conclusions: There were no substantive differences in outcomes regarding persistence and resolution in the treatment of squamous intraepithelial lesions for subjects receiving cone biopsy, cryotherapy, laser ablation, or LEEP. Copyright (C) 2000 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)25-33
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Volume68
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2000

Fingerprint

Cryotherapy
Laser Therapy
Biopsy
Hemorrhage
Therapeutics
Sample Size
Randomized Controlled Trials
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Confidence Intervals
Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions of the Cervix
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Cone biopsy
  • Cryotherapy
  • Laser ablation
  • Loop electrosurgical procedure
  • Squamous intraepithelial lesions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Treatment outcomes for squamous intraepithelial lesions. / Nuovo, James; Melnikow, Joy; Willan, A. R.; Chan, B. K S.

In: International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Vol. 68, No. 1, 01.01.2000, p. 25-33.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{741a821dab4344cbb6b37780d27b60e5,
title = "Treatment outcomes for squamous intraepithelial lesions",
abstract = "Objective: To assess the effectiveness of cone biopsy, cryotherapy, laser ablation and the loop electrosurgical procedure in the treatment of squamous intraepithelial lesions. Method: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials in subjects who underwent treatment of low- and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions with these modalities. Main outcome measures included the following: percent resolution and persistence of a lesion and notable complications for each procedure. Result: Pooled rates of resolution for low-grade, high-grade, or combined squamous intraepithelial lesions were similar across the different treatment modalities (range 85.2-94.7{\%}), with substantial overlap among the 95{\%} confidence intervals. Significant hemorrhage occurred most frequently in subjects who received cone biopsy (4.6{\%}) (95{\%} CI: 2.15, 6.99), followed by laser ablation (1.75{\%}) (95{\%} CI: 0.70, 2.81), and LEEP (1.35{\%}) (95{\%} CI: 0.24, 2.47). No hemorrhages were reported among subjects who received cryotherapy. Study sample sizes were relatively small. There were no reported cases of progression to invasive cancer, but duration of follow-up (median follow-up time for all eligible studies=12 months) was not sufficient to evaluate long-term outcomes. Conclusions: There were no substantive differences in outcomes regarding persistence and resolution in the treatment of squamous intraepithelial lesions for subjects receiving cone biopsy, cryotherapy, laser ablation, or LEEP. Copyright (C) 2000 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.",
keywords = "Cone biopsy, Cryotherapy, Laser ablation, Loop electrosurgical procedure, Squamous intraepithelial lesions",
author = "James Nuovo and Joy Melnikow and Willan, {A. R.} and Chan, {B. K S}",
year = "2000",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0020-7292(99)00162-9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "68",
pages = "25--33",
journal = "International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics",
issn = "0020-7292",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Treatment outcomes for squamous intraepithelial lesions

AU - Nuovo, James

AU - Melnikow, Joy

AU - Willan, A. R.

AU - Chan, B. K S

PY - 2000/1/1

Y1 - 2000/1/1

N2 - Objective: To assess the effectiveness of cone biopsy, cryotherapy, laser ablation and the loop electrosurgical procedure in the treatment of squamous intraepithelial lesions. Method: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials in subjects who underwent treatment of low- and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions with these modalities. Main outcome measures included the following: percent resolution and persistence of a lesion and notable complications for each procedure. Result: Pooled rates of resolution for low-grade, high-grade, or combined squamous intraepithelial lesions were similar across the different treatment modalities (range 85.2-94.7%), with substantial overlap among the 95% confidence intervals. Significant hemorrhage occurred most frequently in subjects who received cone biopsy (4.6%) (95% CI: 2.15, 6.99), followed by laser ablation (1.75%) (95% CI: 0.70, 2.81), and LEEP (1.35%) (95% CI: 0.24, 2.47). No hemorrhages were reported among subjects who received cryotherapy. Study sample sizes were relatively small. There were no reported cases of progression to invasive cancer, but duration of follow-up (median follow-up time for all eligible studies=12 months) was not sufficient to evaluate long-term outcomes. Conclusions: There were no substantive differences in outcomes regarding persistence and resolution in the treatment of squamous intraepithelial lesions for subjects receiving cone biopsy, cryotherapy, laser ablation, or LEEP. Copyright (C) 2000 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

AB - Objective: To assess the effectiveness of cone biopsy, cryotherapy, laser ablation and the loop electrosurgical procedure in the treatment of squamous intraepithelial lesions. Method: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials in subjects who underwent treatment of low- and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions with these modalities. Main outcome measures included the following: percent resolution and persistence of a lesion and notable complications for each procedure. Result: Pooled rates of resolution for low-grade, high-grade, or combined squamous intraepithelial lesions were similar across the different treatment modalities (range 85.2-94.7%), with substantial overlap among the 95% confidence intervals. Significant hemorrhage occurred most frequently in subjects who received cone biopsy (4.6%) (95% CI: 2.15, 6.99), followed by laser ablation (1.75%) (95% CI: 0.70, 2.81), and LEEP (1.35%) (95% CI: 0.24, 2.47). No hemorrhages were reported among subjects who received cryotherapy. Study sample sizes were relatively small. There were no reported cases of progression to invasive cancer, but duration of follow-up (median follow-up time for all eligible studies=12 months) was not sufficient to evaluate long-term outcomes. Conclusions: There were no substantive differences in outcomes regarding persistence and resolution in the treatment of squamous intraepithelial lesions for subjects receiving cone biopsy, cryotherapy, laser ablation, or LEEP. Copyright (C) 2000 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

KW - Cone biopsy

KW - Cryotherapy

KW - Laser ablation

KW - Loop electrosurgical procedure

KW - Squamous intraepithelial lesions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033992306&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033992306&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0020-7292(99)00162-9

DO - 10.1016/S0020-7292(99)00162-9

M3 - Article

C2 - 10687833

AN - SCOPUS:0033992306

VL - 68

SP - 25

EP - 33

JO - International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics

JF - International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics

SN - 0020-7292

IS - 1

ER -