Trauma surgery in the era of nonoperative management: The Dutch model

J. Carel Goslings, Kees Jan Ponsen, Jan S K Luitse, Gregory Jurkovich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Falling operative experience and diminished job satisfaction of trauma surgeons appears to be in part the result of nonoperative management of many blunt injuries. In the Netherlands, the responsibility of trauma surgeons includes the operative treatment of most pelvic and extremity injures, as well as the overall coordination of care. This study describes the type and number of operative procedures performed by a group of trauma surgeons at a trauma center in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. METHODS: The study was conducted in a university Level I trauma center with 1,250 annual trauma admissions (90% blunt trauma), of which 125 had an Injury Severity Score of 16 or above. During a 3-year period (2001-2003), all operative interventions performed by or under direct supervision of the trauma surgeons were retrospectively analyzed and categorized into eight groups. RESULTS: During the 3-year period, 2,011 operations were performed by the trauma surgeon group. Of these, 1,459 were single procedures and 552 were multiple interventions leading to a total of 2,784 procedures. Nonurgent procedures (n = 915) constituted 45% of the operations, whereas acute procedures (n = 1,096) accounted for 55% of the operations. Of the acute operations, almost 60% were performed during office hours; the remaining operations were performed outside office hours (evening 37%, night 13%, weekend 50%). CONCLUSION: This study shows that the addition of (non)operative fracture care results in a viable mix of surgical and nonsurgical management. This leads to broad skills and could enhance job satisfaction. These data could be of interest for the current discussion on the future of trauma surgery in North America and might give a lead to increase the attractiveness of our profession for future trauma surgeons.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)111-114
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care
Volume61
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Wounds and Injuries
Job Satisfaction
Trauma Centers
Netherlands
Accidental Falls
Nonpenetrating Wounds
Injury Severity Score
Operative Surgical Procedures
North America
Surgeons
Extremities
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Acute
  • Elective
  • Fractures
  • Job satisfaction
  • Operations
  • Skills
  • Time
  • Trauma surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Trauma surgery in the era of nonoperative management : The Dutch model. / Goslings, J. Carel; Ponsen, Kees Jan; Luitse, Jan S K; Jurkovich, Gregory.

In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care, Vol. 61, No. 1, 01.07.2006, p. 111-114.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Goslings, J. Carel ; Ponsen, Kees Jan ; Luitse, Jan S K ; Jurkovich, Gregory. / Trauma surgery in the era of nonoperative management : The Dutch model. In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care. 2006 ; Vol. 61, No. 1. pp. 111-114.
@article{ededdae3f2c440b881815475b2ef1ac4,
title = "Trauma surgery in the era of nonoperative management: The Dutch model",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Falling operative experience and diminished job satisfaction of trauma surgeons appears to be in part the result of nonoperative management of many blunt injuries. In the Netherlands, the responsibility of trauma surgeons includes the operative treatment of most pelvic and extremity injures, as well as the overall coordination of care. This study describes the type and number of operative procedures performed by a group of trauma surgeons at a trauma center in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. METHODS: The study was conducted in a university Level I trauma center with 1,250 annual trauma admissions (90{\%} blunt trauma), of which 125 had an Injury Severity Score of 16 or above. During a 3-year period (2001-2003), all operative interventions performed by or under direct supervision of the trauma surgeons were retrospectively analyzed and categorized into eight groups. RESULTS: During the 3-year period, 2,011 operations were performed by the trauma surgeon group. Of these, 1,459 were single procedures and 552 were multiple interventions leading to a total of 2,784 procedures. Nonurgent procedures (n = 915) constituted 45{\%} of the operations, whereas acute procedures (n = 1,096) accounted for 55{\%} of the operations. Of the acute operations, almost 60{\%} were performed during office hours; the remaining operations were performed outside office hours (evening 37{\%}, night 13{\%}, weekend 50{\%}). CONCLUSION: This study shows that the addition of (non)operative fracture care results in a viable mix of surgical and nonsurgical management. This leads to broad skills and could enhance job satisfaction. These data could be of interest for the current discussion on the future of trauma surgery in North America and might give a lead to increase the attractiveness of our profession for future trauma surgeons.",
keywords = "Acute, Elective, Fractures, Job satisfaction, Operations, Skills, Time, Trauma surgery",
author = "Goslings, {J. Carel} and Ponsen, {Kees Jan} and Luitse, {Jan S K} and Gregory Jurkovich",
year = "2006",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/01.ta.0000222704.86560.ac",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "61",
pages = "111--114",
journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
issn = "2163-0755",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Trauma surgery in the era of nonoperative management

T2 - The Dutch model

AU - Goslings, J. Carel

AU - Ponsen, Kees Jan

AU - Luitse, Jan S K

AU - Jurkovich, Gregory

PY - 2006/7/1

Y1 - 2006/7/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Falling operative experience and diminished job satisfaction of trauma surgeons appears to be in part the result of nonoperative management of many blunt injuries. In the Netherlands, the responsibility of trauma surgeons includes the operative treatment of most pelvic and extremity injures, as well as the overall coordination of care. This study describes the type and number of operative procedures performed by a group of trauma surgeons at a trauma center in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. METHODS: The study was conducted in a university Level I trauma center with 1,250 annual trauma admissions (90% blunt trauma), of which 125 had an Injury Severity Score of 16 or above. During a 3-year period (2001-2003), all operative interventions performed by or under direct supervision of the trauma surgeons were retrospectively analyzed and categorized into eight groups. RESULTS: During the 3-year period, 2,011 operations were performed by the trauma surgeon group. Of these, 1,459 were single procedures and 552 were multiple interventions leading to a total of 2,784 procedures. Nonurgent procedures (n = 915) constituted 45% of the operations, whereas acute procedures (n = 1,096) accounted for 55% of the operations. Of the acute operations, almost 60% were performed during office hours; the remaining operations were performed outside office hours (evening 37%, night 13%, weekend 50%). CONCLUSION: This study shows that the addition of (non)operative fracture care results in a viable mix of surgical and nonsurgical management. This leads to broad skills and could enhance job satisfaction. These data could be of interest for the current discussion on the future of trauma surgery in North America and might give a lead to increase the attractiveness of our profession for future trauma surgeons.

AB - BACKGROUND: Falling operative experience and diminished job satisfaction of trauma surgeons appears to be in part the result of nonoperative management of many blunt injuries. In the Netherlands, the responsibility of trauma surgeons includes the operative treatment of most pelvic and extremity injures, as well as the overall coordination of care. This study describes the type and number of operative procedures performed by a group of trauma surgeons at a trauma center in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. METHODS: The study was conducted in a university Level I trauma center with 1,250 annual trauma admissions (90% blunt trauma), of which 125 had an Injury Severity Score of 16 or above. During a 3-year period (2001-2003), all operative interventions performed by or under direct supervision of the trauma surgeons were retrospectively analyzed and categorized into eight groups. RESULTS: During the 3-year period, 2,011 operations were performed by the trauma surgeon group. Of these, 1,459 were single procedures and 552 were multiple interventions leading to a total of 2,784 procedures. Nonurgent procedures (n = 915) constituted 45% of the operations, whereas acute procedures (n = 1,096) accounted for 55% of the operations. Of the acute operations, almost 60% were performed during office hours; the remaining operations were performed outside office hours (evening 37%, night 13%, weekend 50%). CONCLUSION: This study shows that the addition of (non)operative fracture care results in a viable mix of surgical and nonsurgical management. This leads to broad skills and could enhance job satisfaction. These data could be of interest for the current discussion on the future of trauma surgery in North America and might give a lead to increase the attractiveness of our profession for future trauma surgeons.

KW - Acute

KW - Elective

KW - Fractures

KW - Job satisfaction

KW - Operations

KW - Skills

KW - Time

KW - Trauma surgery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33746218325&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33746218325&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.ta.0000222704.86560.ac

DO - 10.1097/01.ta.0000222704.86560.ac

M3 - Article

C2 - 16832257

AN - SCOPUS:33746218325

VL - 61

SP - 111

EP - 114

JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

SN - 2163-0755

IS - 1

ER -