Trauma outcomes in the rural developing world: Comparison with an urban level I trauma center

Charles N. Mock, K. Ellis Adzotor, Elizabeth Conklin, Donna M. Denno, Gregory Jurkovich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

104 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Trauma is well known as a major cause of death and disability in the developed world, but has been inadequately studied in developing nations. We reviewed 539 trauma patients admitted from 1987 through 1991 to a rural African hospital, the Holy Family Hospital (HFH) in Berekum, Ghana, and compared these results with 14, 270 patients admitted during the same period to a level I trauma center, the Harborview Medical Center (HMC) in Seattle, Washington. At HFH, 59% of patients were seen >24 hours after injury, compared with 4% of HMC patients (p < 0.001). Only 25% of HFH patients received prehospital care, compared with 82% of HMC patients (p < 0.001). Mean ISS was higher at HMC (10.0 ± 6.3) than at HFH (6.7 ± 6.5) (p < 0.001), but trauma mortality rates were identical (6%) at both institutions. Neurologic injuries were the leading cause of death at both HFH (62%) and HMC (54%). There was no significant difference between institutions in mortality for patients with ISS 1-8 (HMC: 0. 7% n = 6390; HFH: 0.3%, n = 342). There was a marked decrease in mortality for patients with ISS 9-24 at HMC (3%, n = 3709) compared with HFH (10%, n = 146) (p < 0.001). There was a less pronounced decrease in mortality for patients with ISS > 24 at HMC (41%, n = 1520) compared with HFH (73%, n = 26) (p < 0.01). The type and the severity of injuries causing fatalities in this developing nation suggest that no inexpensive hospital-based changes would improve outcomes. The lack of prehospital care and the long delays in transport to the hospital indicate areas in which less costly interventions might decrease mortality from trauma.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)518-523
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care
Volume35
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1993
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Trauma Centers
Wounds and Injuries
Developing Countries
Rural Hospitals
Ghana
Cause of Death
Mortality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Trauma outcomes in the rural developing world : Comparison with an urban level I trauma center. / Mock, Charles N.; Adzotor, K. Ellis; Conklin, Elizabeth; Denno, Donna M.; Jurkovich, Gregory.

In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care, Vol. 35, No. 4, 01.01.1993, p. 518-523.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mock, Charles N. ; Adzotor, K. Ellis ; Conklin, Elizabeth ; Denno, Donna M. ; Jurkovich, Gregory. / Trauma outcomes in the rural developing world : Comparison with an urban level I trauma center. In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care. 1993 ; Vol. 35, No. 4. pp. 518-523.
@article{f30d5d13bd0a4057b9d5ff253c70ff72,
title = "Trauma outcomes in the rural developing world: Comparison with an urban level I trauma center",
abstract = "Trauma is well known as a major cause of death and disability in the developed world, but has been inadequately studied in developing nations. We reviewed 539 trauma patients admitted from 1987 through 1991 to a rural African hospital, the Holy Family Hospital (HFH) in Berekum, Ghana, and compared these results with 14, 270 patients admitted during the same period to a level I trauma center, the Harborview Medical Center (HMC) in Seattle, Washington. At HFH, 59{\%} of patients were seen >24 hours after injury, compared with 4{\%} of HMC patients (p < 0.001). Only 25{\%} of HFH patients received prehospital care, compared with 82{\%} of HMC patients (p < 0.001). Mean ISS was higher at HMC (10.0 ± 6.3) than at HFH (6.7 ± 6.5) (p < 0.001), but trauma mortality rates were identical (6{\%}) at both institutions. Neurologic injuries were the leading cause of death at both HFH (62{\%}) and HMC (54{\%}). There was no significant difference between institutions in mortality for patients with ISS 1-8 (HMC: 0. 7{\%} n = 6390; HFH: 0.3{\%}, n = 342). There was a marked decrease in mortality for patients with ISS 9-24 at HMC (3{\%}, n = 3709) compared with HFH (10{\%}, n = 146) (p < 0.001). There was a less pronounced decrease in mortality for patients with ISS > 24 at HMC (41{\%}, n = 1520) compared with HFH (73{\%}, n = 26) (p < 0.01). The type and the severity of injuries causing fatalities in this developing nation suggest that no inexpensive hospital-based changes would improve outcomes. The lack of prehospital care and the long delays in transport to the hospital indicate areas in which less costly interventions might decrease mortality from trauma.",
author = "Mock, {Charles N.} and Adzotor, {K. Ellis} and Elizabeth Conklin and Denno, {Donna M.} and Gregory Jurkovich",
year = "1993",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/00005373-199310000-00004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "518--523",
journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
issn = "2163-0755",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Trauma outcomes in the rural developing world

T2 - Comparison with an urban level I trauma center

AU - Mock, Charles N.

AU - Adzotor, K. Ellis

AU - Conklin, Elizabeth

AU - Denno, Donna M.

AU - Jurkovich, Gregory

PY - 1993/1/1

Y1 - 1993/1/1

N2 - Trauma is well known as a major cause of death and disability in the developed world, but has been inadequately studied in developing nations. We reviewed 539 trauma patients admitted from 1987 through 1991 to a rural African hospital, the Holy Family Hospital (HFH) in Berekum, Ghana, and compared these results with 14, 270 patients admitted during the same period to a level I trauma center, the Harborview Medical Center (HMC) in Seattle, Washington. At HFH, 59% of patients were seen >24 hours after injury, compared with 4% of HMC patients (p < 0.001). Only 25% of HFH patients received prehospital care, compared with 82% of HMC patients (p < 0.001). Mean ISS was higher at HMC (10.0 ± 6.3) than at HFH (6.7 ± 6.5) (p < 0.001), but trauma mortality rates were identical (6%) at both institutions. Neurologic injuries were the leading cause of death at both HFH (62%) and HMC (54%). There was no significant difference between institutions in mortality for patients with ISS 1-8 (HMC: 0. 7% n = 6390; HFH: 0.3%, n = 342). There was a marked decrease in mortality for patients with ISS 9-24 at HMC (3%, n = 3709) compared with HFH (10%, n = 146) (p < 0.001). There was a less pronounced decrease in mortality for patients with ISS > 24 at HMC (41%, n = 1520) compared with HFH (73%, n = 26) (p < 0.01). The type and the severity of injuries causing fatalities in this developing nation suggest that no inexpensive hospital-based changes would improve outcomes. The lack of prehospital care and the long delays in transport to the hospital indicate areas in which less costly interventions might decrease mortality from trauma.

AB - Trauma is well known as a major cause of death and disability in the developed world, but has been inadequately studied in developing nations. We reviewed 539 trauma patients admitted from 1987 through 1991 to a rural African hospital, the Holy Family Hospital (HFH) in Berekum, Ghana, and compared these results with 14, 270 patients admitted during the same period to a level I trauma center, the Harborview Medical Center (HMC) in Seattle, Washington. At HFH, 59% of patients were seen >24 hours after injury, compared with 4% of HMC patients (p < 0.001). Only 25% of HFH patients received prehospital care, compared with 82% of HMC patients (p < 0.001). Mean ISS was higher at HMC (10.0 ± 6.3) than at HFH (6.7 ± 6.5) (p < 0.001), but trauma mortality rates were identical (6%) at both institutions. Neurologic injuries were the leading cause of death at both HFH (62%) and HMC (54%). There was no significant difference between institutions in mortality for patients with ISS 1-8 (HMC: 0. 7% n = 6390; HFH: 0.3%, n = 342). There was a marked decrease in mortality for patients with ISS 9-24 at HMC (3%, n = 3709) compared with HFH (10%, n = 146) (p < 0.001). There was a less pronounced decrease in mortality for patients with ISS > 24 at HMC (41%, n = 1520) compared with HFH (73%, n = 26) (p < 0.01). The type and the severity of injuries causing fatalities in this developing nation suggest that no inexpensive hospital-based changes would improve outcomes. The lack of prehospital care and the long delays in transport to the hospital indicate areas in which less costly interventions might decrease mortality from trauma.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027378426&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027378426&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00005373-199310000-00004

DO - 10.1097/00005373-199310000-00004

M3 - Article

C2 - 8411273

AN - SCOPUS:0027378426

VL - 35

SP - 518

EP - 523

JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

SN - 2163-0755

IS - 4

ER -