Trauma in pregnant women: assessing detection of post-traumatic placental abruption on contrast-enhanced CT versus ultrasound

Priyanka Jha, Giselle M Melendres, Bijan Bijan, Eleanor Ormsby, Lisa Chu, Chin-Shang Li, John P McGahan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Abstract: Objectives: To evaluate detection of post-traumatic placental abruption with contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) and comparison with Ultrasound (US). Abstract: Methods: Picture Archive and Date System database at a level-1 trauma center was retrospectively reviewed using keywords pregnancy, trauma, and/or placental abruption over 10 years. CT was compared to US, if performed within 24 h. Two subspecialty-trained radiologists blindly reviewed the studies. Placental features on delivery and pregnancy outcomes were used as reference standard. Lack of adverse pregnancy/fetal outcome was treated as the absence of abruption. Abstract: Results: CECT was performed in 36 patients, with 27 US within 24 h. There were three complete and eight partial abruptions. Reader sensitivity for CT was 100% for both reviewers; however, specificity was 54.5% and 56.7%. No sonographic abnormality was noted in both partial and complete abruption. Using kappa statistics, inter-observer agreement was low for both CT (0.169) and US (0.078). False-positive reads were from misinterpretation of normal placental structures like cotyledons, age-related infarcts, and marginal sinus of the placenta. Abstract: Conclusions: CECT identifies post-traumatic placental abruption with high sensitivity but low specificity for clinically significant abruptions, and performs better than US. Pitfalls from normal placental structures mimicking abruption should be avoided. US markedly underdiagnoses abruption.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-6
Number of pages6
JournalAbdominal Radiology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Nov 16 2016

Fingerprint

Abruptio Placentae
Pregnant Women
Pregnancy Outcome
Wounds and Injuries
Cotyledon
Trauma Centers
Placenta
Databases
Sensitivity and Specificity
Pregnancy

Keywords

  • Computed tomography
  • CT
  • Placental abruption
  • Trauma
  • Ultrasound
  • US

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Gastroenterology
  • Urology
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Trauma in pregnant women : assessing detection of post-traumatic placental abruption on contrast-enhanced CT versus ultrasound. / Jha, Priyanka; Melendres, Giselle M; Bijan, Bijan; Ormsby, Eleanor; Chu, Lisa; Li, Chin-Shang; McGahan, John P.

In: Abdominal Radiology, 16.11.2016, p. 1-6.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2618eee66e0044518c16979c6906a0dd,
title = "Trauma in pregnant women: assessing detection of post-traumatic placental abruption on contrast-enhanced CT versus ultrasound",
abstract = "Abstract: Objectives: To evaluate detection of post-traumatic placental abruption with contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) and comparison with Ultrasound (US). Abstract: Methods: Picture Archive and Date System database at a level-1 trauma center was retrospectively reviewed using keywords pregnancy, trauma, and/or placental abruption over 10 years. CT was compared to US, if performed within 24 h. Two subspecialty-trained radiologists blindly reviewed the studies. Placental features on delivery and pregnancy outcomes were used as reference standard. Lack of adverse pregnancy/fetal outcome was treated as the absence of abruption. Abstract: Results: CECT was performed in 36 patients, with 27 US within 24 h. There were three complete and eight partial abruptions. Reader sensitivity for CT was 100{\%} for both reviewers; however, specificity was 54.5{\%} and 56.7{\%}. No sonographic abnormality was noted in both partial and complete abruption. Using kappa statistics, inter-observer agreement was low for both CT (0.169) and US (0.078). False-positive reads were from misinterpretation of normal placental structures like cotyledons, age-related infarcts, and marginal sinus of the placenta. Abstract: Conclusions: CECT identifies post-traumatic placental abruption with high sensitivity but low specificity for clinically significant abruptions, and performs better than US. Pitfalls from normal placental structures mimicking abruption should be avoided. US markedly underdiagnoses abruption.",
keywords = "Computed tomography, CT, Placental abruption, Trauma, Ultrasound, US",
author = "Priyanka Jha and Melendres, {Giselle M} and Bijan Bijan and Eleanor Ormsby and Lisa Chu and Chin-Shang Li and McGahan, {John P}",
year = "2016",
month = "11",
day = "16",
doi = "10.1007/s00261-016-0970-x",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--6",
journal = "Abdominal Radiology",
issn = "2366-004X",
publisher = "Springer New York",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Trauma in pregnant women

T2 - assessing detection of post-traumatic placental abruption on contrast-enhanced CT versus ultrasound

AU - Jha, Priyanka

AU - Melendres, Giselle M

AU - Bijan, Bijan

AU - Ormsby, Eleanor

AU - Chu, Lisa

AU - Li, Chin-Shang

AU - McGahan, John P

PY - 2016/11/16

Y1 - 2016/11/16

N2 - Abstract: Objectives: To evaluate detection of post-traumatic placental abruption with contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) and comparison with Ultrasound (US). Abstract: Methods: Picture Archive and Date System database at a level-1 trauma center was retrospectively reviewed using keywords pregnancy, trauma, and/or placental abruption over 10 years. CT was compared to US, if performed within 24 h. Two subspecialty-trained radiologists blindly reviewed the studies. Placental features on delivery and pregnancy outcomes were used as reference standard. Lack of adverse pregnancy/fetal outcome was treated as the absence of abruption. Abstract: Results: CECT was performed in 36 patients, with 27 US within 24 h. There were three complete and eight partial abruptions. Reader sensitivity for CT was 100% for both reviewers; however, specificity was 54.5% and 56.7%. No sonographic abnormality was noted in both partial and complete abruption. Using kappa statistics, inter-observer agreement was low for both CT (0.169) and US (0.078). False-positive reads were from misinterpretation of normal placental structures like cotyledons, age-related infarcts, and marginal sinus of the placenta. Abstract: Conclusions: CECT identifies post-traumatic placental abruption with high sensitivity but low specificity for clinically significant abruptions, and performs better than US. Pitfalls from normal placental structures mimicking abruption should be avoided. US markedly underdiagnoses abruption.

AB - Abstract: Objectives: To evaluate detection of post-traumatic placental abruption with contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) and comparison with Ultrasound (US). Abstract: Methods: Picture Archive and Date System database at a level-1 trauma center was retrospectively reviewed using keywords pregnancy, trauma, and/or placental abruption over 10 years. CT was compared to US, if performed within 24 h. Two subspecialty-trained radiologists blindly reviewed the studies. Placental features on delivery and pregnancy outcomes were used as reference standard. Lack of adverse pregnancy/fetal outcome was treated as the absence of abruption. Abstract: Results: CECT was performed in 36 patients, with 27 US within 24 h. There were three complete and eight partial abruptions. Reader sensitivity for CT was 100% for both reviewers; however, specificity was 54.5% and 56.7%. No sonographic abnormality was noted in both partial and complete abruption. Using kappa statistics, inter-observer agreement was low for both CT (0.169) and US (0.078). False-positive reads were from misinterpretation of normal placental structures like cotyledons, age-related infarcts, and marginal sinus of the placenta. Abstract: Conclusions: CECT identifies post-traumatic placental abruption with high sensitivity but low specificity for clinically significant abruptions, and performs better than US. Pitfalls from normal placental structures mimicking abruption should be avoided. US markedly underdiagnoses abruption.

KW - Computed tomography

KW - CT

KW - Placental abruption

KW - Trauma

KW - Ultrasound

KW - US

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84995402596&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84995402596&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00261-016-0970-x

DO - 10.1007/s00261-016-0970-x

M3 - Article

C2 - 27853848

AN - SCOPUS:84995402596

SP - 1

EP - 6

JO - Abdominal Radiology

JF - Abdominal Radiology

SN - 2366-004X

ER -