Transoral laser microsurgery versus radiation therapy for early glottic cancer in Canada: Cost analysis

Timothy James Phillips, Chady Sader, Tim Brown, Martin Bullock, Derek Wilke, Jonathan R.B. Trites, Rob Hart, Michael Murphy, S. Mark Taylor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: There is debate over whether radiation therapy or transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) is the superior treatment for early glottic cancer. Both offer similar cure rates and posttherapy quality of life. One factor that could decide the optimum therapy is cost. Several studies in Europe and the United States show that TLM is the most cost-effective treatment. The goal of this study was to conduct the first cost analysis in Canada on the treatment of early glottic cancer comparing radiation therapy and TLM. Design and Methods: The study was conducted retrospectively. TLM and radiation therapy were broken down into individual components, and then the price for each component was summed. Setting: The study was conducted at the Queen Elizabeth II Health Science Centre in Halifax, Nova Scotia. Main Outcome Measures: The main outcome measure was total cost. Results: It was found that radiation therapy was approximately four times more expensive than TLM. Conclusions: This study suggests that TLM should be the preferred treatment option for treating early glottic cancer in Canada as it is the most economical and has been shown in previous studies to be as effective as radiation therapy in both cure rates and quality of life.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)619-623
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
Volume38
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Tongue Neoplasms
Microsurgery
Canada
Lasers
Radiotherapy
Costs and Cost Analysis
Quality of Life
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Nova Scotia
Laser Therapy
Therapeutics
Health Care Costs
Health

Keywords

  • Cost analysis
  • Cost effective
  • Glottic cancer
  • Radiation therapy
  • Transoral laser microsurgery
  • Treatment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Transoral laser microsurgery versus radiation therapy for early glottic cancer in Canada : Cost analysis. / Phillips, Timothy James; Sader, Chady; Brown, Tim; Bullock, Martin; Wilke, Derek; Trites, Jonathan R.B.; Hart, Rob; Murphy, Michael; Taylor, S. Mark.

In: Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Vol. 38, No. 6, 01.12.2009, p. 619-623.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Phillips, TJ, Sader, C, Brown, T, Bullock, M, Wilke, D, Trites, JRB, Hart, R, Murphy, M & Taylor, SM 2009, 'Transoral laser microsurgery versus radiation therapy for early glottic cancer in Canada: Cost analysis', Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 619-623. https://doi.org/10.2310/7070.2009.080254
Phillips, Timothy James ; Sader, Chady ; Brown, Tim ; Bullock, Martin ; Wilke, Derek ; Trites, Jonathan R.B. ; Hart, Rob ; Murphy, Michael ; Taylor, S. Mark. / Transoral laser microsurgery versus radiation therapy for early glottic cancer in Canada : Cost analysis. In: Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery. 2009 ; Vol. 38, No. 6. pp. 619-623.
@article{a1a4115f29474075a6e1e03088ee9f4b,
title = "Transoral laser microsurgery versus radiation therapy for early glottic cancer in Canada: Cost analysis",
abstract = "Objective: There is debate over whether radiation therapy or transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) is the superior treatment for early glottic cancer. Both offer similar cure rates and posttherapy quality of life. One factor that could decide the optimum therapy is cost. Several studies in Europe and the United States show that TLM is the most cost-effective treatment. The goal of this study was to conduct the first cost analysis in Canada on the treatment of early glottic cancer comparing radiation therapy and TLM. Design and Methods: The study was conducted retrospectively. TLM and radiation therapy were broken down into individual components, and then the price for each component was summed. Setting: The study was conducted at the Queen Elizabeth II Health Science Centre in Halifax, Nova Scotia. Main Outcome Measures: The main outcome measure was total cost. Results: It was found that radiation therapy was approximately four times more expensive than TLM. Conclusions: This study suggests that TLM should be the preferred treatment option for treating early glottic cancer in Canada as it is the most economical and has been shown in previous studies to be as effective as radiation therapy in both cure rates and quality of life.",
keywords = "Cost analysis, Cost effective, Glottic cancer, Radiation therapy, Transoral laser microsurgery, Treatment",
author = "Phillips, {Timothy James} and Chady Sader and Tim Brown and Martin Bullock and Derek Wilke and Trites, {Jonathan R.B.} and Rob Hart and Michael Murphy and Taylor, {S. Mark}",
year = "2009",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2310/7070.2009.080254",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "619--623",
journal = "Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery",
issn = "1916-0208",
publisher = "Decker Publishing",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Transoral laser microsurgery versus radiation therapy for early glottic cancer in Canada

T2 - Cost analysis

AU - Phillips, Timothy James

AU - Sader, Chady

AU - Brown, Tim

AU - Bullock, Martin

AU - Wilke, Derek

AU - Trites, Jonathan R.B.

AU - Hart, Rob

AU - Murphy, Michael

AU - Taylor, S. Mark

PY - 2009/12/1

Y1 - 2009/12/1

N2 - Objective: There is debate over whether radiation therapy or transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) is the superior treatment for early glottic cancer. Both offer similar cure rates and posttherapy quality of life. One factor that could decide the optimum therapy is cost. Several studies in Europe and the United States show that TLM is the most cost-effective treatment. The goal of this study was to conduct the first cost analysis in Canada on the treatment of early glottic cancer comparing radiation therapy and TLM. Design and Methods: The study was conducted retrospectively. TLM and radiation therapy were broken down into individual components, and then the price for each component was summed. Setting: The study was conducted at the Queen Elizabeth II Health Science Centre in Halifax, Nova Scotia. Main Outcome Measures: The main outcome measure was total cost. Results: It was found that radiation therapy was approximately four times more expensive than TLM. Conclusions: This study suggests that TLM should be the preferred treatment option for treating early glottic cancer in Canada as it is the most economical and has been shown in previous studies to be as effective as radiation therapy in both cure rates and quality of life.

AB - Objective: There is debate over whether radiation therapy or transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) is the superior treatment for early glottic cancer. Both offer similar cure rates and posttherapy quality of life. One factor that could decide the optimum therapy is cost. Several studies in Europe and the United States show that TLM is the most cost-effective treatment. The goal of this study was to conduct the first cost analysis in Canada on the treatment of early glottic cancer comparing radiation therapy and TLM. Design and Methods: The study was conducted retrospectively. TLM and radiation therapy were broken down into individual components, and then the price for each component was summed. Setting: The study was conducted at the Queen Elizabeth II Health Science Centre in Halifax, Nova Scotia. Main Outcome Measures: The main outcome measure was total cost. Results: It was found that radiation therapy was approximately four times more expensive than TLM. Conclusions: This study suggests that TLM should be the preferred treatment option for treating early glottic cancer in Canada as it is the most economical and has been shown in previous studies to be as effective as radiation therapy in both cure rates and quality of life.

KW - Cost analysis

KW - Cost effective

KW - Glottic cancer

KW - Radiation therapy

KW - Transoral laser microsurgery

KW - Treatment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=73449139120&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=73449139120&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2310/7070.2009.080254

DO - 10.2310/7070.2009.080254

M3 - Article

C2 - 19958723

AN - SCOPUS:73449139120

VL - 38

SP - 619

EP - 623

JO - Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery

JF - Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery

SN - 1916-0208

IS - 6

ER -