Transcutaneous electrical stimulation versus traditional dysphagia therapy: A nonconcurrent cohort study

Liza Blumenfeld, Yoav Hahn, Amanda LePage, Rebecca J Leonard, Peter C Belafsky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

63 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this investigation was to critically evaluate the efficacy of electrical stimulation (ES) in treating persons with dysphagia and aspiration. Study design: Nonconcurrent cohort study. Methodology: The charts of 40 consecutive individuals undergoing ES and 40 consecutive persons undergoing traditional dysphagia therapy (TDT) were reviewed. Pre- and post-therapy treatment success was compared utilizing a previously described swallow severity scale. A linear regression analysis was employed to adjust for potential confounding variables. Results: The swallow severity scale improved from 0.50 to 1.48 in the TDT group (P < 0.05) and from 0.28 to 3.23 in the ES group (P < 0.001). After adjusting for potential confounding factors, persons receiving ES did significantly better in regard to improvement in their swallowing function than persons receiving TDT (P = 0.003). Conclusions: The results of this nonconcurrent cohort study suggest that dysphagia therapy with transcutaneous electrical stimulation is superior to traditional dysphagia therapy alone in individuals in a long-term acute care facility.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)754-757
Number of pages4
JournalOtolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
Volume135
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2006

Fingerprint

Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation
Deglutition Disorders
Cohort Studies
Electric Stimulation
Deglutition
Therapeutics
Confounding Factors (Epidemiology)
Long-Term Care
Group Psychotherapy
Linear Models
Regression Analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Transcutaneous electrical stimulation versus traditional dysphagia therapy : A nonconcurrent cohort study. / Blumenfeld, Liza; Hahn, Yoav; LePage, Amanda; Leonard, Rebecca J; Belafsky, Peter C.

In: Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Vol. 135, No. 5, 11.2006, p. 754-757.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a579016d175e41ee962b0c19de140c3a,
title = "Transcutaneous electrical stimulation versus traditional dysphagia therapy: A nonconcurrent cohort study",
abstract = "Objective: The purpose of this investigation was to critically evaluate the efficacy of electrical stimulation (ES) in treating persons with dysphagia and aspiration. Study design: Nonconcurrent cohort study. Methodology: The charts of 40 consecutive individuals undergoing ES and 40 consecutive persons undergoing traditional dysphagia therapy (TDT) were reviewed. Pre- and post-therapy treatment success was compared utilizing a previously described swallow severity scale. A linear regression analysis was employed to adjust for potential confounding variables. Results: The swallow severity scale improved from 0.50 to 1.48 in the TDT group (P < 0.05) and from 0.28 to 3.23 in the ES group (P < 0.001). After adjusting for potential confounding factors, persons receiving ES did significantly better in regard to improvement in their swallowing function than persons receiving TDT (P = 0.003). Conclusions: The results of this nonconcurrent cohort study suggest that dysphagia therapy with transcutaneous electrical stimulation is superior to traditional dysphagia therapy alone in individuals in a long-term acute care facility.",
author = "Liza Blumenfeld and Yoav Hahn and Amanda LePage and Leonard, {Rebecca J} and Belafsky, {Peter C}",
year = "2006",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.otohns.2006.04.016",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "135",
pages = "754--757",
journal = "Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)",
issn = "0194-5998",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Transcutaneous electrical stimulation versus traditional dysphagia therapy

T2 - A nonconcurrent cohort study

AU - Blumenfeld, Liza

AU - Hahn, Yoav

AU - LePage, Amanda

AU - Leonard, Rebecca J

AU - Belafsky, Peter C

PY - 2006/11

Y1 - 2006/11

N2 - Objective: The purpose of this investigation was to critically evaluate the efficacy of electrical stimulation (ES) in treating persons with dysphagia and aspiration. Study design: Nonconcurrent cohort study. Methodology: The charts of 40 consecutive individuals undergoing ES and 40 consecutive persons undergoing traditional dysphagia therapy (TDT) were reviewed. Pre- and post-therapy treatment success was compared utilizing a previously described swallow severity scale. A linear regression analysis was employed to adjust for potential confounding variables. Results: The swallow severity scale improved from 0.50 to 1.48 in the TDT group (P < 0.05) and from 0.28 to 3.23 in the ES group (P < 0.001). After adjusting for potential confounding factors, persons receiving ES did significantly better in regard to improvement in their swallowing function than persons receiving TDT (P = 0.003). Conclusions: The results of this nonconcurrent cohort study suggest that dysphagia therapy with transcutaneous electrical stimulation is superior to traditional dysphagia therapy alone in individuals in a long-term acute care facility.

AB - Objective: The purpose of this investigation was to critically evaluate the efficacy of electrical stimulation (ES) in treating persons with dysphagia and aspiration. Study design: Nonconcurrent cohort study. Methodology: The charts of 40 consecutive individuals undergoing ES and 40 consecutive persons undergoing traditional dysphagia therapy (TDT) were reviewed. Pre- and post-therapy treatment success was compared utilizing a previously described swallow severity scale. A linear regression analysis was employed to adjust for potential confounding variables. Results: The swallow severity scale improved from 0.50 to 1.48 in the TDT group (P < 0.05) and from 0.28 to 3.23 in the ES group (P < 0.001). After adjusting for potential confounding factors, persons receiving ES did significantly better in regard to improvement in their swallowing function than persons receiving TDT (P = 0.003). Conclusions: The results of this nonconcurrent cohort study suggest that dysphagia therapy with transcutaneous electrical stimulation is superior to traditional dysphagia therapy alone in individuals in a long-term acute care facility.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33750331484&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33750331484&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.otohns.2006.04.016

DO - 10.1016/j.otohns.2006.04.016

M3 - Article

C2 - 17071307

AN - SCOPUS:33750331484

VL - 135

SP - 754

EP - 757

JO - Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)

JF - Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)

SN - 0194-5998

IS - 5

ER -