Trajectories of Relative Performance with 2 Measures of Global Cognitive Function

Mark A. Espeland, Jiu Chiuan Chen, Julie Weitlauf, Kathleen M. Hayden, Stephen R. Rapp, Susan M. Resnick, Lorena Garcia, Brad Cannell, Laura D. Baker, Bonnie C. Sachs, Hilary A. Tindle, Robert Wallace, Ramon Casanova

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To examine whether trajectories of global cognitive function over time in studies that change assessment protocols may be modeled based on an individual's performance relative to others in the study cohort. Design: Extended follow-up of a cohort originally enrolled in a clinical trial of postmenopausal hormone therapy. Setting: The Women's Health Initiative Memory Study switched from an in-person interview with the Modified Mini-Mental State Examination to a telephone-based interview with the modified Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status to assess global cognitive function over long-term follow-up. Participants: Women aged 75 to 92 (N=2,561). Measurements: Annual cognitive assessments from participants, ranked according to age-, race- and ethnicity-adjusted performance levels, were used to identify distinct trajectories. Participants assigned to the resulting trajectories were compared for selected risk factor profiles. Results: Our approach grouped participants into five trajectories according to relative cognitive performance over time. These groups differed significantly according to 3 known risk factors for cognitive decline-education level, apolipoprotein E-ε(lunate)4 genotype, and type 2 diabetes mellitus-and a biomarker based on brain structure that has been linked to cognitive decline and Alzheimer's disease. Participants with consistently low relative levels of cognitive function over time and those whose relative performance over time declined to these levels tended to have poorer risk factor profiles. Conclusion: Longitudinal measures of an individual's relative performance on different assessment protocols for global cognitive function can be used to identify trajectories of change over time that appear to have internal validity with respect to known risk factors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of the American Geriatrics Society
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Cognition
Interviews
Apolipoprotein E4
Women's Health
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Alzheimer Disease
Cohort Studies
Biomarkers
Genotype
Clinical Trials
Hormones
Education
Brain
Cognitive Dysfunction
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Assessment modalities
  • Global cognitive function
  • Longitudinal trajectories
  • Risk factors

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geriatrics and Gerontology

Cite this

Espeland, M. A., Chen, J. C., Weitlauf, J., Hayden, K. M., Rapp, S. R., Resnick, S. M., ... Casanova, R. (Accepted/In press). Trajectories of Relative Performance with 2 Measures of Global Cognitive Function. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.15431

Trajectories of Relative Performance with 2 Measures of Global Cognitive Function. / Espeland, Mark A.; Chen, Jiu Chiuan; Weitlauf, Julie; Hayden, Kathleen M.; Rapp, Stephen R.; Resnick, Susan M.; Garcia, Lorena; Cannell, Brad; Baker, Laura D.; Sachs, Bonnie C.; Tindle, Hilary A.; Wallace, Robert; Casanova, Ramon.

In: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Espeland, MA, Chen, JC, Weitlauf, J, Hayden, KM, Rapp, SR, Resnick, SM, Garcia, L, Cannell, B, Baker, LD, Sachs, BC, Tindle, HA, Wallace, R & Casanova, R 2018, 'Trajectories of Relative Performance with 2 Measures of Global Cognitive Function', Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.15431
Espeland, Mark A. ; Chen, Jiu Chiuan ; Weitlauf, Julie ; Hayden, Kathleen M. ; Rapp, Stephen R. ; Resnick, Susan M. ; Garcia, Lorena ; Cannell, Brad ; Baker, Laura D. ; Sachs, Bonnie C. ; Tindle, Hilary A. ; Wallace, Robert ; Casanova, Ramon. / Trajectories of Relative Performance with 2 Measures of Global Cognitive Function. In: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2018.
@article{cb46b5545c044257b39b3e790fc97425,
title = "Trajectories of Relative Performance with 2 Measures of Global Cognitive Function",
abstract = "Objectives: To examine whether trajectories of global cognitive function over time in studies that change assessment protocols may be modeled based on an individual's performance relative to others in the study cohort. Design: Extended follow-up of a cohort originally enrolled in a clinical trial of postmenopausal hormone therapy. Setting: The Women's Health Initiative Memory Study switched from an in-person interview with the Modified Mini-Mental State Examination to a telephone-based interview with the modified Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status to assess global cognitive function over long-term follow-up. Participants: Women aged 75 to 92 (N=2,561). Measurements: Annual cognitive assessments from participants, ranked according to age-, race- and ethnicity-adjusted performance levels, were used to identify distinct trajectories. Participants assigned to the resulting trajectories were compared for selected risk factor profiles. Results: Our approach grouped participants into five trajectories according to relative cognitive performance over time. These groups differed significantly according to 3 known risk factors for cognitive decline-education level, apolipoprotein E-ε(lunate)4 genotype, and type 2 diabetes mellitus-and a biomarker based on brain structure that has been linked to cognitive decline and Alzheimer's disease. Participants with consistently low relative levels of cognitive function over time and those whose relative performance over time declined to these levels tended to have poorer risk factor profiles. Conclusion: Longitudinal measures of an individual's relative performance on different assessment protocols for global cognitive function can be used to identify trajectories of change over time that appear to have internal validity with respect to known risk factors.",
keywords = "Assessment modalities, Global cognitive function, Longitudinal trajectories, Risk factors",
author = "Espeland, {Mark A.} and Chen, {Jiu Chiuan} and Julie Weitlauf and Hayden, {Kathleen M.} and Rapp, {Stephen R.} and Resnick, {Susan M.} and Lorena Garcia and Brad Cannell and Baker, {Laura D.} and Sachs, {Bonnie C.} and Tindle, {Hilary A.} and Robert Wallace and Ramon Casanova",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jgs.15431",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of the American Geriatrics Society",
issn = "0002-8614",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Trajectories of Relative Performance with 2 Measures of Global Cognitive Function

AU - Espeland, Mark A.

AU - Chen, Jiu Chiuan

AU - Weitlauf, Julie

AU - Hayden, Kathleen M.

AU - Rapp, Stephen R.

AU - Resnick, Susan M.

AU - Garcia, Lorena

AU - Cannell, Brad

AU - Baker, Laura D.

AU - Sachs, Bonnie C.

AU - Tindle, Hilary A.

AU - Wallace, Robert

AU - Casanova, Ramon

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Objectives: To examine whether trajectories of global cognitive function over time in studies that change assessment protocols may be modeled based on an individual's performance relative to others in the study cohort. Design: Extended follow-up of a cohort originally enrolled in a clinical trial of postmenopausal hormone therapy. Setting: The Women's Health Initiative Memory Study switched from an in-person interview with the Modified Mini-Mental State Examination to a telephone-based interview with the modified Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status to assess global cognitive function over long-term follow-up. Participants: Women aged 75 to 92 (N=2,561). Measurements: Annual cognitive assessments from participants, ranked according to age-, race- and ethnicity-adjusted performance levels, were used to identify distinct trajectories. Participants assigned to the resulting trajectories were compared for selected risk factor profiles. Results: Our approach grouped participants into five trajectories according to relative cognitive performance over time. These groups differed significantly according to 3 known risk factors for cognitive decline-education level, apolipoprotein E-ε(lunate)4 genotype, and type 2 diabetes mellitus-and a biomarker based on brain structure that has been linked to cognitive decline and Alzheimer's disease. Participants with consistently low relative levels of cognitive function over time and those whose relative performance over time declined to these levels tended to have poorer risk factor profiles. Conclusion: Longitudinal measures of an individual's relative performance on different assessment protocols for global cognitive function can be used to identify trajectories of change over time that appear to have internal validity with respect to known risk factors.

AB - Objectives: To examine whether trajectories of global cognitive function over time in studies that change assessment protocols may be modeled based on an individual's performance relative to others in the study cohort. Design: Extended follow-up of a cohort originally enrolled in a clinical trial of postmenopausal hormone therapy. Setting: The Women's Health Initiative Memory Study switched from an in-person interview with the Modified Mini-Mental State Examination to a telephone-based interview with the modified Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status to assess global cognitive function over long-term follow-up. Participants: Women aged 75 to 92 (N=2,561). Measurements: Annual cognitive assessments from participants, ranked according to age-, race- and ethnicity-adjusted performance levels, were used to identify distinct trajectories. Participants assigned to the resulting trajectories were compared for selected risk factor profiles. Results: Our approach grouped participants into five trajectories according to relative cognitive performance over time. These groups differed significantly according to 3 known risk factors for cognitive decline-education level, apolipoprotein E-ε(lunate)4 genotype, and type 2 diabetes mellitus-and a biomarker based on brain structure that has been linked to cognitive decline and Alzheimer's disease. Participants with consistently low relative levels of cognitive function over time and those whose relative performance over time declined to these levels tended to have poorer risk factor profiles. Conclusion: Longitudinal measures of an individual's relative performance on different assessment protocols for global cognitive function can be used to identify trajectories of change over time that appear to have internal validity with respect to known risk factors.

KW - Assessment modalities

KW - Global cognitive function

KW - Longitudinal trajectories

KW - Risk factors

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050450929&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85050450929&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jgs.15431

DO - 10.1111/jgs.15431

M3 - Article

JO - Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

JF - Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

SN - 0002-8614

ER -