Toward Consistency in Cost - Utility Analyses Using National Measures to Create Condition-Specific Values

Marthe R. Gold, Peter Franks, Kristine I. McCoy, Dennis G. Fryback

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

266 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES. The authors developed an "off- the-shelf" source of health-related quality of life (HRQL) scores for cost-effectiveness analysts unable to collect primary data. METHODS. The authors derived and conducted preliminary validation on a set of health-related quality of life scores for chronic conditions using nationally representative data from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) and the Healthy People 2000 Years of Healthy Life measure developed to monitor the health (longevity and health-related quality of life) of Americans during this decade. The measure comprises two domains, role function and self-rated health, and is scaled from 0 (death) to 1 (best health state). Health-related quality of life scores for chronic conditions were calculated using the Years of Healthy Life scores associated with chronic conditions reported in the 1987-1992 National Health Interview Survey. Preliminary validation was examined by comparing the health-related quality of life scores with those obtained in two other studies. RESULTS. Tables provide health-related quality of life scores for persons with and without conditions. The scores had reasonable face validity, ranging from 0.87 for allergic rhinitis to 0.27 for hemiplegia. Correlations of the health-related quality of life condition weight scores with those from two other studies were 0.78 and 0.86. CONCLUSIONS. These condition weights may prove useful to investigators conducting cost-effectiveness analyses using secondary data, where community ratings of health-related quality of life for chronic conditions are required. Use of a standard set of health-related quality of life weights gathered from a national sample can enhance the comparability of cost-effectiveness analyses. Improvements in national data collection techniques, with empirical gathering of preferences, will further strengthen this measure.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)778-792
Number of pages15
JournalMedical Care
Volume36
Issue number6
StatePublished - Jun 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cost-Benefit Analysis
Quality of Life
quality of life
costs
health
Values
Health Surveys
Weights and Measures
Health
Healthy People Programs
Interviews
Hemiplegia
Reproducibility of Results
data collection method
Research Personnel
interview
rating
death

Keywords

  • Cost-effectiveness analysis
  • Health status measures
  • Health-related quality of life
  • Population health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Nursing(all)
  • Health(social science)
  • Health Professions(all)

Cite this

Toward Consistency in Cost - Utility Analyses Using National Measures to Create Condition-Specific Values. / Gold, Marthe R.; Franks, Peter; McCoy, Kristine I.; Fryback, Dennis G.

In: Medical Care, Vol. 36, No. 6, 06.1998, p. 778-792.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gold, Marthe R. ; Franks, Peter ; McCoy, Kristine I. ; Fryback, Dennis G. / Toward Consistency in Cost - Utility Analyses Using National Measures to Create Condition-Specific Values. In: Medical Care. 1998 ; Vol. 36, No. 6. pp. 778-792.
@article{e99799a65a5b49eab80fcc6675f84005,
title = "Toward Consistency in Cost - Utility Analyses Using National Measures to Create Condition-Specific Values",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES. The authors developed an {"}off- the-shelf{"} source of health-related quality of life (HRQL) scores for cost-effectiveness analysts unable to collect primary data. METHODS. The authors derived and conducted preliminary validation on a set of health-related quality of life scores for chronic conditions using nationally representative data from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) and the Healthy People 2000 Years of Healthy Life measure developed to monitor the health (longevity and health-related quality of life) of Americans during this decade. The measure comprises two domains, role function and self-rated health, and is scaled from 0 (death) to 1 (best health state). Health-related quality of life scores for chronic conditions were calculated using the Years of Healthy Life scores associated with chronic conditions reported in the 1987-1992 National Health Interview Survey. Preliminary validation was examined by comparing the health-related quality of life scores with those obtained in two other studies. RESULTS. Tables provide health-related quality of life scores for persons with and without conditions. The scores had reasonable face validity, ranging from 0.87 for allergic rhinitis to 0.27 for hemiplegia. Correlations of the health-related quality of life condition weight scores with those from two other studies were 0.78 and 0.86. CONCLUSIONS. These condition weights may prove useful to investigators conducting cost-effectiveness analyses using secondary data, where community ratings of health-related quality of life for chronic conditions are required. Use of a standard set of health-related quality of life weights gathered from a national sample can enhance the comparability of cost-effectiveness analyses. Improvements in national data collection techniques, with empirical gathering of preferences, will further strengthen this measure.",
keywords = "Cost-effectiveness analysis, Health status measures, Health-related quality of life, Population health",
author = "Gold, {Marthe R.} and Peter Franks and McCoy, {Kristine I.} and Fryback, {Dennis G.}",
year = "1998",
month = "6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "778--792",
journal = "Medical Care",
issn = "0025-7079",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Toward Consistency in Cost - Utility Analyses Using National Measures to Create Condition-Specific Values

AU - Gold, Marthe R.

AU - Franks, Peter

AU - McCoy, Kristine I.

AU - Fryback, Dennis G.

PY - 1998/6

Y1 - 1998/6

N2 - OBJECTIVES. The authors developed an "off- the-shelf" source of health-related quality of life (HRQL) scores for cost-effectiveness analysts unable to collect primary data. METHODS. The authors derived and conducted preliminary validation on a set of health-related quality of life scores for chronic conditions using nationally representative data from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) and the Healthy People 2000 Years of Healthy Life measure developed to monitor the health (longevity and health-related quality of life) of Americans during this decade. The measure comprises two domains, role function and self-rated health, and is scaled from 0 (death) to 1 (best health state). Health-related quality of life scores for chronic conditions were calculated using the Years of Healthy Life scores associated with chronic conditions reported in the 1987-1992 National Health Interview Survey. Preliminary validation was examined by comparing the health-related quality of life scores with those obtained in two other studies. RESULTS. Tables provide health-related quality of life scores for persons with and without conditions. The scores had reasonable face validity, ranging from 0.87 for allergic rhinitis to 0.27 for hemiplegia. Correlations of the health-related quality of life condition weight scores with those from two other studies were 0.78 and 0.86. CONCLUSIONS. These condition weights may prove useful to investigators conducting cost-effectiveness analyses using secondary data, where community ratings of health-related quality of life for chronic conditions are required. Use of a standard set of health-related quality of life weights gathered from a national sample can enhance the comparability of cost-effectiveness analyses. Improvements in national data collection techniques, with empirical gathering of preferences, will further strengthen this measure.

AB - OBJECTIVES. The authors developed an "off- the-shelf" source of health-related quality of life (HRQL) scores for cost-effectiveness analysts unable to collect primary data. METHODS. The authors derived and conducted preliminary validation on a set of health-related quality of life scores for chronic conditions using nationally representative data from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) and the Healthy People 2000 Years of Healthy Life measure developed to monitor the health (longevity and health-related quality of life) of Americans during this decade. The measure comprises two domains, role function and self-rated health, and is scaled from 0 (death) to 1 (best health state). Health-related quality of life scores for chronic conditions were calculated using the Years of Healthy Life scores associated with chronic conditions reported in the 1987-1992 National Health Interview Survey. Preliminary validation was examined by comparing the health-related quality of life scores with those obtained in two other studies. RESULTS. Tables provide health-related quality of life scores for persons with and without conditions. The scores had reasonable face validity, ranging from 0.87 for allergic rhinitis to 0.27 for hemiplegia. Correlations of the health-related quality of life condition weight scores with those from two other studies were 0.78 and 0.86. CONCLUSIONS. These condition weights may prove useful to investigators conducting cost-effectiveness analyses using secondary data, where community ratings of health-related quality of life for chronic conditions are required. Use of a standard set of health-related quality of life weights gathered from a national sample can enhance the comparability of cost-effectiveness analyses. Improvements in national data collection techniques, with empirical gathering of preferences, will further strengthen this measure.

KW - Cost-effectiveness analysis

KW - Health status measures

KW - Health-related quality of life

KW - Population health

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032091121&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032091121&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9630120

AN - SCOPUS:0032091121

VL - 36

SP - 778

EP - 792

JO - Medical Care

JF - Medical Care

SN - 0025-7079

IS - 6

ER -