Timing and patterns of exposures during pregnancy and their implications for study methods

Irva Hertz-Picciotto, Lisa M. Pastore, James J. Beaumont

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

48 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Patterns of exposure variability across pregnancy were examined for medical, lifestyle, residential, and occupational exposures in a population- based sample of 357 livebirths from 10 rural California counties. A new measure of variability, the ratio of overall prevalence to time-window- specific prevalence, is introduced. The higher the overall:time window (OTW) ratio, the greater the potential for misclassification when using anytime- during-pregnancy prevalence for an agent that exerts its effect in a smaller time window. Exposures to cigarettes, marijuana, saunas/hot tubs, factors related to location of residence, and some workplace substances tended to be of longer duration. Intertrimester concordance was high (κ's > 0.8) for smoking, residential proximity to crops, and use of video display terminals; moderately high (κ's between 0.4 and 0.8) for many occupational exposures; and low (κ'S < 0.4) for illnesses, which tended to be of short duration. The lowest OTW ratios were for smoking and some residential exposures (1.1-1.3), while OTW ratios were much higher for paint applications, influenza, vaginal infections, and ultrasound (reaching, e.g., 4-6). Use of anytime-during- pregnancy exposure indices can bias measures of association between risk factors and adverse pregnancy outcomes, particularly if the OTW ratio is high. Misclassification bias occurs if there is a vulnerable time window during which the exposure exerts its effect. The misclassification can be differential when the average length of gestation of cases is shorter than that of controls. For exposures that vary, investigations of pregnancy outcome should collect as much detail as feasible regarding timing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)597-607
Number of pages11
JournalAmerican Journal of Epidemiology
Volume143
Issue number6
StatePublished - Mar 15 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Pregnancy
Occupational Exposure
Pregnancy Outcome
Computer Terminals
Smoking
Steam Bath
Paint
Cannabis
Tobacco Products
Workplace
Human Influenza
Life Style
Infection
Population

Keywords

  • bias (epidemiology)
  • environmental exposure
  • epidemiologic methods
  • fetal death
  • life style
  • occupational exposure
  • pesticides
  • pregnancy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology

Cite this

Timing and patterns of exposures during pregnancy and their implications for study methods. / Hertz-Picciotto, Irva; Pastore, Lisa M.; Beaumont, James J.

In: American Journal of Epidemiology, Vol. 143, No. 6, 15.03.1996, p. 597-607.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7c808ef2e4af421f80129a41748a8a7b,
title = "Timing and patterns of exposures during pregnancy and their implications for study methods",
abstract = "Patterns of exposure variability across pregnancy were examined for medical, lifestyle, residential, and occupational exposures in a population- based sample of 357 livebirths from 10 rural California counties. A new measure of variability, the ratio of overall prevalence to time-window- specific prevalence, is introduced. The higher the overall:time window (OTW) ratio, the greater the potential for misclassification when using anytime- during-pregnancy prevalence for an agent that exerts its effect in a smaller time window. Exposures to cigarettes, marijuana, saunas/hot tubs, factors related to location of residence, and some workplace substances tended to be of longer duration. Intertrimester concordance was high (κ's > 0.8) for smoking, residential proximity to crops, and use of video display terminals; moderately high (κ's between 0.4 and 0.8) for many occupational exposures; and low (κ'S < 0.4) for illnesses, which tended to be of short duration. The lowest OTW ratios were for smoking and some residential exposures (1.1-1.3), while OTW ratios were much higher for paint applications, influenza, vaginal infections, and ultrasound (reaching, e.g., 4-6). Use of anytime-during- pregnancy exposure indices can bias measures of association between risk factors and adverse pregnancy outcomes, particularly if the OTW ratio is high. Misclassification bias occurs if there is a vulnerable time window during which the exposure exerts its effect. The misclassification can be differential when the average length of gestation of cases is shorter than that of controls. For exposures that vary, investigations of pregnancy outcome should collect as much detail as feasible regarding timing.",
keywords = "bias (epidemiology), environmental exposure, epidemiologic methods, fetal death, life style, occupational exposure, pesticides, pregnancy",
author = "Irva Hertz-Picciotto and Pastore, {Lisa M.} and Beaumont, {James J.}",
year = "1996",
month = "3",
day = "15",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "143",
pages = "597--607",
journal = "American Journal of Epidemiology",
issn = "0002-9262",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Timing and patterns of exposures during pregnancy and their implications for study methods

AU - Hertz-Picciotto, Irva

AU - Pastore, Lisa M.

AU - Beaumont, James J.

PY - 1996/3/15

Y1 - 1996/3/15

N2 - Patterns of exposure variability across pregnancy were examined for medical, lifestyle, residential, and occupational exposures in a population- based sample of 357 livebirths from 10 rural California counties. A new measure of variability, the ratio of overall prevalence to time-window- specific prevalence, is introduced. The higher the overall:time window (OTW) ratio, the greater the potential for misclassification when using anytime- during-pregnancy prevalence for an agent that exerts its effect in a smaller time window. Exposures to cigarettes, marijuana, saunas/hot tubs, factors related to location of residence, and some workplace substances tended to be of longer duration. Intertrimester concordance was high (κ's > 0.8) for smoking, residential proximity to crops, and use of video display terminals; moderately high (κ's between 0.4 and 0.8) for many occupational exposures; and low (κ'S < 0.4) for illnesses, which tended to be of short duration. The lowest OTW ratios were for smoking and some residential exposures (1.1-1.3), while OTW ratios were much higher for paint applications, influenza, vaginal infections, and ultrasound (reaching, e.g., 4-6). Use of anytime-during- pregnancy exposure indices can bias measures of association between risk factors and adverse pregnancy outcomes, particularly if the OTW ratio is high. Misclassification bias occurs if there is a vulnerable time window during which the exposure exerts its effect. The misclassification can be differential when the average length of gestation of cases is shorter than that of controls. For exposures that vary, investigations of pregnancy outcome should collect as much detail as feasible regarding timing.

AB - Patterns of exposure variability across pregnancy were examined for medical, lifestyle, residential, and occupational exposures in a population- based sample of 357 livebirths from 10 rural California counties. A new measure of variability, the ratio of overall prevalence to time-window- specific prevalence, is introduced. The higher the overall:time window (OTW) ratio, the greater the potential for misclassification when using anytime- during-pregnancy prevalence for an agent that exerts its effect in a smaller time window. Exposures to cigarettes, marijuana, saunas/hot tubs, factors related to location of residence, and some workplace substances tended to be of longer duration. Intertrimester concordance was high (κ's > 0.8) for smoking, residential proximity to crops, and use of video display terminals; moderately high (κ's between 0.4 and 0.8) for many occupational exposures; and low (κ'S < 0.4) for illnesses, which tended to be of short duration. The lowest OTW ratios were for smoking and some residential exposures (1.1-1.3), while OTW ratios were much higher for paint applications, influenza, vaginal infections, and ultrasound (reaching, e.g., 4-6). Use of anytime-during- pregnancy exposure indices can bias measures of association between risk factors and adverse pregnancy outcomes, particularly if the OTW ratio is high. Misclassification bias occurs if there is a vulnerable time window during which the exposure exerts its effect. The misclassification can be differential when the average length of gestation of cases is shorter than that of controls. For exposures that vary, investigations of pregnancy outcome should collect as much detail as feasible regarding timing.

KW - bias (epidemiology)

KW - environmental exposure

KW - epidemiologic methods

KW - fetal death

KW - life style

KW - occupational exposure

KW - pesticides

KW - pregnancy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029870346&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029870346&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 143

SP - 597

EP - 607

JO - American Journal of Epidemiology

JF - American Journal of Epidemiology

SN - 0002-9262

IS - 6

ER -