Time of meal ingestion affects loss of weight and fat-free mass (FFM) in women

N. Keim, M. Van Loan, W. Horn, P. Mavclin, T. Barbieri

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The goal of this study was to determine if time of energy ingestion affected change in body weight or composition during a weight loss program of mild energy restriction and regular exercise. Ten women (BM1±SD=28.2 +4.1) completed the residential study comprised of a 3 wk weight stable period followed by a 12 wk weight loss period. Time of ingestion of the diet (7.8 MJ; 59% cho, 19% pro, 22% fat) was varied, with 70% of energy consumed either in the morning (AM) or the evening (PM) for the first 6 wk of the weight loss period. Then subjects were crossed over to the alternate intake pattern for the final 6 wk. Women were weighed daily, and body composition was measured twice weekly by the total body electrical conductivity method. Using ANOVA, there was no significant effect of order on weight or body composition changes. Weight loss (± pooled SEM) was greater with AM than with PM intake: 3.52±0.16vs. 3.20+0.16 kg for 6 wk, p<0.05. Body fat loss over 6 wk was not affected by ingestion time: AM = 2.76+0.20 and PM=2.90±0.20 kg. FFM loss was greater with AM than PM intake, 0.58+0.10 vs. 0.18±0.10 kg, p<0.01. To conclude, ingestion of the bulk of energy in the morning resulted in slightly greater weight loss, where-as evening energy intake was associated with better maintenance of FFM. The lack of a meal time effect on fat loss suggests that there is no metabolic advantage to morning consumption in promoting loss of body energy stores.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalFASEB Journal
Volume10
Issue number3
StatePublished - 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Meals
Weight Loss
weight loss
Eating
Body Composition
Fats
ingestion
energy
body composition
lipids
Weight Reduction Programs
Weights and Measures
Electric Conductivity
Energy Intake
Adipose Tissue
Analysis of Variance
Maintenance
body fat
electrical conductivity
Exercise

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Biochemistry
  • Cell Biology

Cite this

Keim, N., Van Loan, M., Horn, W., Mavclin, P., & Barbieri, T. (1996). Time of meal ingestion affects loss of weight and fat-free mass (FFM) in women. FASEB Journal, 10(3).

Time of meal ingestion affects loss of weight and fat-free mass (FFM) in women. / Keim, N.; Van Loan, M.; Horn, W.; Mavclin, P.; Barbieri, T.

In: FASEB Journal, Vol. 10, No. 3, 1996.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Keim, N, Van Loan, M, Horn, W, Mavclin, P & Barbieri, T 1996, 'Time of meal ingestion affects loss of weight and fat-free mass (FFM) in women', FASEB Journal, vol. 10, no. 3.
Keim N, Van Loan M, Horn W, Mavclin P, Barbieri T. Time of meal ingestion affects loss of weight and fat-free mass (FFM) in women. FASEB Journal. 1996;10(3).
Keim, N. ; Van Loan, M. ; Horn, W. ; Mavclin, P. ; Barbieri, T. / Time of meal ingestion affects loss of weight and fat-free mass (FFM) in women. In: FASEB Journal. 1996 ; Vol. 10, No. 3.
@article{2d4d50a539614d91847282f725b35d64,
title = "Time of meal ingestion affects loss of weight and fat-free mass (FFM) in women",
abstract = "The goal of this study was to determine if time of energy ingestion affected change in body weight or composition during a weight loss program of mild energy restriction and regular exercise. Ten women (BM1±SD=28.2 +4.1) completed the residential study comprised of a 3 wk weight stable period followed by a 12 wk weight loss period. Time of ingestion of the diet (7.8 MJ; 59{\%} cho, 19{\%} pro, 22{\%} fat) was varied, with 70{\%} of energy consumed either in the morning (AM) or the evening (PM) for the first 6 wk of the weight loss period. Then subjects were crossed over to the alternate intake pattern for the final 6 wk. Women were weighed daily, and body composition was measured twice weekly by the total body electrical conductivity method. Using ANOVA, there was no significant effect of order on weight or body composition changes. Weight loss (± pooled SEM) was greater with AM than with PM intake: 3.52±0.16vs. 3.20+0.16 kg for 6 wk, p<0.05. Body fat loss over 6 wk was not affected by ingestion time: AM = 2.76+0.20 and PM=2.90±0.20 kg. FFM loss was greater with AM than PM intake, 0.58+0.10 vs. 0.18±0.10 kg, p<0.01. To conclude, ingestion of the bulk of energy in the morning resulted in slightly greater weight loss, where-as evening energy intake was associated with better maintenance of FFM. The lack of a meal time effect on fat loss suggests that there is no metabolic advantage to morning consumption in promoting loss of body energy stores.",
author = "N. Keim and {Van Loan}, M. and W. Horn and P. Mavclin and T. Barbieri",
year = "1996",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
journal = "FASEB Journal",
issn = "0892-6638",
publisher = "FASEB",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Time of meal ingestion affects loss of weight and fat-free mass (FFM) in women

AU - Keim, N.

AU - Van Loan, M.

AU - Horn, W.

AU - Mavclin, P.

AU - Barbieri, T.

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - The goal of this study was to determine if time of energy ingestion affected change in body weight or composition during a weight loss program of mild energy restriction and regular exercise. Ten women (BM1±SD=28.2 +4.1) completed the residential study comprised of a 3 wk weight stable period followed by a 12 wk weight loss period. Time of ingestion of the diet (7.8 MJ; 59% cho, 19% pro, 22% fat) was varied, with 70% of energy consumed either in the morning (AM) or the evening (PM) for the first 6 wk of the weight loss period. Then subjects were crossed over to the alternate intake pattern for the final 6 wk. Women were weighed daily, and body composition was measured twice weekly by the total body electrical conductivity method. Using ANOVA, there was no significant effect of order on weight or body composition changes. Weight loss (± pooled SEM) was greater with AM than with PM intake: 3.52±0.16vs. 3.20+0.16 kg for 6 wk, p<0.05. Body fat loss over 6 wk was not affected by ingestion time: AM = 2.76+0.20 and PM=2.90±0.20 kg. FFM loss was greater with AM than PM intake, 0.58+0.10 vs. 0.18±0.10 kg, p<0.01. To conclude, ingestion of the bulk of energy in the morning resulted in slightly greater weight loss, where-as evening energy intake was associated with better maintenance of FFM. The lack of a meal time effect on fat loss suggests that there is no metabolic advantage to morning consumption in promoting loss of body energy stores.

AB - The goal of this study was to determine if time of energy ingestion affected change in body weight or composition during a weight loss program of mild energy restriction and regular exercise. Ten women (BM1±SD=28.2 +4.1) completed the residential study comprised of a 3 wk weight stable period followed by a 12 wk weight loss period. Time of ingestion of the diet (7.8 MJ; 59% cho, 19% pro, 22% fat) was varied, with 70% of energy consumed either in the morning (AM) or the evening (PM) for the first 6 wk of the weight loss period. Then subjects were crossed over to the alternate intake pattern for the final 6 wk. Women were weighed daily, and body composition was measured twice weekly by the total body electrical conductivity method. Using ANOVA, there was no significant effect of order on weight or body composition changes. Weight loss (± pooled SEM) was greater with AM than with PM intake: 3.52±0.16vs. 3.20+0.16 kg for 6 wk, p<0.05. Body fat loss over 6 wk was not affected by ingestion time: AM = 2.76+0.20 and PM=2.90±0.20 kg. FFM loss was greater with AM than PM intake, 0.58+0.10 vs. 0.18±0.10 kg, p<0.01. To conclude, ingestion of the bulk of energy in the morning resulted in slightly greater weight loss, where-as evening energy intake was associated with better maintenance of FFM. The lack of a meal time effect on fat loss suggests that there is no metabolic advantage to morning consumption in promoting loss of body energy stores.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33749109310&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33749109310&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 10

JO - FASEB Journal

JF - FASEB Journal

SN - 0892-6638

IS - 3

ER -