Time interval effect on repeat cervical smear results

John W Bishop, James S. Hartinger, Gene F. Pawlick

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Second cervical smears obtained at short time intervals often exhibit a lesser degree of abnormality than the first smear. We studied the effect of time interval between smears on diagnoses in two large, distinctive cohorts. STUDY DESIGN: Patients with two or more satisfactory smears with at least one smear or a cervical biopsy showing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or greater were selected. Patients were divided into four subsets by test intervals (days) (≤ 45, 46-90, 91-120, >120) and compared statistically. RESULTS: The distribution of differences between results for the short-interval subsets (<120) was significantly different (P<.01) from the interval subset >120 days. At short intervals the results revealed loss of sensitivity in the second smear as compared to the initial smear and concurrent biopsies. CONCLUSION: Rapidly repeated cervical smears show poor agreement with the biopsy and may be misleading. This effect is most pronounced when the interval is <45 days. Colposcopists should consider whether concurrent smears shortly after an abnormal smear are worth performing, given the loss of sensitivity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)269-276
Number of pages8
JournalActa Cytologica
Volume41
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Vaginal Smears
Biopsy

Keywords

  • cervical smears
  • follow-up studies
  • predictive value of tests
  • time factors

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anatomy
  • Cell Biology
  • Histology

Cite this

Bishop, J. W., Hartinger, J. S., & Pawlick, G. F. (1997). Time interval effect on repeat cervical smear results. Acta Cytologica, 41(2), 269-276.

Time interval effect on repeat cervical smear results. / Bishop, John W; Hartinger, James S.; Pawlick, Gene F.

In: Acta Cytologica, Vol. 41, No. 2, 1997, p. 269-276.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bishop, JW, Hartinger, JS & Pawlick, GF 1997, 'Time interval effect on repeat cervical smear results', Acta Cytologica, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 269-276.
Bishop, John W ; Hartinger, James S. ; Pawlick, Gene F. / Time interval effect on repeat cervical smear results. In: Acta Cytologica. 1997 ; Vol. 41, No. 2. pp. 269-276.
@article{ddefbb1c0d6b4255a15e27128f68e1d4,
title = "Time interval effect on repeat cervical smear results",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: Second cervical smears obtained at short time intervals often exhibit a lesser degree of abnormality than the first smear. We studied the effect of time interval between smears on diagnoses in two large, distinctive cohorts. STUDY DESIGN: Patients with two or more satisfactory smears with at least one smear or a cervical biopsy showing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or greater were selected. Patients were divided into four subsets by test intervals (days) (≤ 45, 46-90, 91-120, >120) and compared statistically. RESULTS: The distribution of differences between results for the short-interval subsets (<120) was significantly different (P<.01) from the interval subset >120 days. At short intervals the results revealed loss of sensitivity in the second smear as compared to the initial smear and concurrent biopsies. CONCLUSION: Rapidly repeated cervical smears show poor agreement with the biopsy and may be misleading. This effect is most pronounced when the interval is <45 days. Colposcopists should consider whether concurrent smears shortly after an abnormal smear are worth performing, given the loss of sensitivity.",
keywords = "cervical smears, follow-up studies, predictive value of tests, time factors",
author = "Bishop, {John W} and Hartinger, {James S.} and Pawlick, {Gene F.}",
year = "1997",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "269--276",
journal = "Acta Cytologica",
issn = "0001-5547",
publisher = "Science Printers and Publishers Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Time interval effect on repeat cervical smear results

AU - Bishop, John W

AU - Hartinger, James S.

AU - Pawlick, Gene F.

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - OBJECTIVE: Second cervical smears obtained at short time intervals often exhibit a lesser degree of abnormality than the first smear. We studied the effect of time interval between smears on diagnoses in two large, distinctive cohorts. STUDY DESIGN: Patients with two or more satisfactory smears with at least one smear or a cervical biopsy showing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or greater were selected. Patients were divided into four subsets by test intervals (days) (≤ 45, 46-90, 91-120, >120) and compared statistically. RESULTS: The distribution of differences between results for the short-interval subsets (<120) was significantly different (P<.01) from the interval subset >120 days. At short intervals the results revealed loss of sensitivity in the second smear as compared to the initial smear and concurrent biopsies. CONCLUSION: Rapidly repeated cervical smears show poor agreement with the biopsy and may be misleading. This effect is most pronounced when the interval is <45 days. Colposcopists should consider whether concurrent smears shortly after an abnormal smear are worth performing, given the loss of sensitivity.

AB - OBJECTIVE: Second cervical smears obtained at short time intervals often exhibit a lesser degree of abnormality than the first smear. We studied the effect of time interval between smears on diagnoses in two large, distinctive cohorts. STUDY DESIGN: Patients with two or more satisfactory smears with at least one smear or a cervical biopsy showing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or greater were selected. Patients were divided into four subsets by test intervals (days) (≤ 45, 46-90, 91-120, >120) and compared statistically. RESULTS: The distribution of differences between results for the short-interval subsets (<120) was significantly different (P<.01) from the interval subset >120 days. At short intervals the results revealed loss of sensitivity in the second smear as compared to the initial smear and concurrent biopsies. CONCLUSION: Rapidly repeated cervical smears show poor agreement with the biopsy and may be misleading. This effect is most pronounced when the interval is <45 days. Colposcopists should consider whether concurrent smears shortly after an abnormal smear are worth performing, given the loss of sensitivity.

KW - cervical smears

KW - follow-up studies

KW - predictive value of tests

KW - time factors

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031001930&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031001930&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 269

EP - 276

JO - Acta Cytologica

JF - Acta Cytologica

SN - 0001-5547

IS - 2

ER -