Three- to six-year follow-up of stand-alone BAK cages implanted by a single surgeon

Gavin Button, Munish Gupta, Cinnie Barrett, Paul Cammack, Daniel Benson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background context: Multiple studies involving the outcomes of anterior interbody cages have been published, but the majority were by authors who designed the cage. No outcome studies with Bagby and Kuslich (BAK) cages implanted by a single-surgeon have either 3 years of follow-up or at least 25 patients. Purpose: To determine the 3- to 6-year clinical outcomes, including fusion rate, revision rate, complications and functional status of patients who underwent placement of anterior, stand-alone BAK cages by a single surgeon. Study design: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent anterior, stand-alone BAK cage placement by a single surgeon with a minimum of 3 years of follow-up. Patient sample: A total of 46 consecutive patients who underwent placement of anterior BAK cages from 1997 to 1999 were the study group. Outcome measures: Complications, fusion rate, revision rate, Prolo scores, Oswestry scores, pain scores, patient satisfaction. Methods: A retrospective review of charts of patients undergoing anterior stand-alone placement of BAK cages over the study period were reviewed. Demographic data were collected, and postoperative radiographs and clinic notes were reviewed. Patients were then contacted to complete a survey to determine Prolo and Oswestry scores, workers' compensation status and general satisfaction with the procedure. Patients were also asked to undergo repeat radiographs of their lumbar spine to determine if the operative levels had fused. Results: Follow-up was available on 33 of 46 patients (72%). At least 10 patients (22%) required revision surgery. Ten patients (22%) had 14 total complications not requiring revision surgery. Seventy percent of patients had a fair or poor outcome as assessed by the Prolo rating system, and 58% of patients had at least "severe disability" according to the Oswestry outcome scale. Fifty percent of patients were satisfied with their surgery. Conclusions: This single-surgeon series of stand-alone BAK cages demonstrates significantly worse clinical outcomes than has been previously reported. The use of stand-alone BAK cages for degenerative disc disease should be reconsidered given the large number of patients with unacceptable outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)155-160
Number of pages6
JournalSpine Journal
Volume5
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2005

Fingerprint

Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Surgeons
Reoperation
Workers' Compensation
Patient Satisfaction
Spine
Cohort Studies
Retrospective Studies
Demography
Pain
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • BAK cages
  • Complications
  • Failures
  • Outcomes
  • Revision rate

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Surgery

Cite this

Three- to six-year follow-up of stand-alone BAK cages implanted by a single surgeon. / Button, Gavin; Gupta, Munish; Barrett, Cinnie; Cammack, Paul; Benson, Daniel.

In: Spine Journal, Vol. 5, No. 2, 03.2005, p. 155-160.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Button, G, Gupta, M, Barrett, C, Cammack, P & Benson, D 2005, 'Three- to six-year follow-up of stand-alone BAK cages implanted by a single surgeon', Spine Journal, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 155-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2004.06.021
Button, Gavin ; Gupta, Munish ; Barrett, Cinnie ; Cammack, Paul ; Benson, Daniel. / Three- to six-year follow-up of stand-alone BAK cages implanted by a single surgeon. In: Spine Journal. 2005 ; Vol. 5, No. 2. pp. 155-160.
@article{ac6935820b1c43989f997b63a1f37638,
title = "Three- to six-year follow-up of stand-alone BAK cages implanted by a single surgeon",
abstract = "Background context: Multiple studies involving the outcomes of anterior interbody cages have been published, but the majority were by authors who designed the cage. No outcome studies with Bagby and Kuslich (BAK) cages implanted by a single-surgeon have either 3 years of follow-up or at least 25 patients. Purpose: To determine the 3- to 6-year clinical outcomes, including fusion rate, revision rate, complications and functional status of patients who underwent placement of anterior, stand-alone BAK cages by a single surgeon. Study design: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent anterior, stand-alone BAK cage placement by a single surgeon with a minimum of 3 years of follow-up. Patient sample: A total of 46 consecutive patients who underwent placement of anterior BAK cages from 1997 to 1999 were the study group. Outcome measures: Complications, fusion rate, revision rate, Prolo scores, Oswestry scores, pain scores, patient satisfaction. Methods: A retrospective review of charts of patients undergoing anterior stand-alone placement of BAK cages over the study period were reviewed. Demographic data were collected, and postoperative radiographs and clinic notes were reviewed. Patients were then contacted to complete a survey to determine Prolo and Oswestry scores, workers' compensation status and general satisfaction with the procedure. Patients were also asked to undergo repeat radiographs of their lumbar spine to determine if the operative levels had fused. Results: Follow-up was available on 33 of 46 patients (72{\%}). At least 10 patients (22{\%}) required revision surgery. Ten patients (22{\%}) had 14 total complications not requiring revision surgery. Seventy percent of patients had a fair or poor outcome as assessed by the Prolo rating system, and 58{\%} of patients had at least {"}severe disability{"} according to the Oswestry outcome scale. Fifty percent of patients were satisfied with their surgery. Conclusions: This single-surgeon series of stand-alone BAK cages demonstrates significantly worse clinical outcomes than has been previously reported. The use of stand-alone BAK cages for degenerative disc disease should be reconsidered given the large number of patients with unacceptable outcomes.",
keywords = "BAK cages, Complications, Failures, Outcomes, Revision rate",
author = "Gavin Button and Munish Gupta and Cinnie Barrett and Paul Cammack and Daniel Benson",
year = "2005",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.spinee.2004.06.021",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "155--160",
journal = "Spine Journal",
issn = "1529-9430",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Three- to six-year follow-up of stand-alone BAK cages implanted by a single surgeon

AU - Button, Gavin

AU - Gupta, Munish

AU - Barrett, Cinnie

AU - Cammack, Paul

AU - Benson, Daniel

PY - 2005/3

Y1 - 2005/3

N2 - Background context: Multiple studies involving the outcomes of anterior interbody cages have been published, but the majority were by authors who designed the cage. No outcome studies with Bagby and Kuslich (BAK) cages implanted by a single-surgeon have either 3 years of follow-up or at least 25 patients. Purpose: To determine the 3- to 6-year clinical outcomes, including fusion rate, revision rate, complications and functional status of patients who underwent placement of anterior, stand-alone BAK cages by a single surgeon. Study design: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent anterior, stand-alone BAK cage placement by a single surgeon with a minimum of 3 years of follow-up. Patient sample: A total of 46 consecutive patients who underwent placement of anterior BAK cages from 1997 to 1999 were the study group. Outcome measures: Complications, fusion rate, revision rate, Prolo scores, Oswestry scores, pain scores, patient satisfaction. Methods: A retrospective review of charts of patients undergoing anterior stand-alone placement of BAK cages over the study period were reviewed. Demographic data were collected, and postoperative radiographs and clinic notes were reviewed. Patients were then contacted to complete a survey to determine Prolo and Oswestry scores, workers' compensation status and general satisfaction with the procedure. Patients were also asked to undergo repeat radiographs of their lumbar spine to determine if the operative levels had fused. Results: Follow-up was available on 33 of 46 patients (72%). At least 10 patients (22%) required revision surgery. Ten patients (22%) had 14 total complications not requiring revision surgery. Seventy percent of patients had a fair or poor outcome as assessed by the Prolo rating system, and 58% of patients had at least "severe disability" according to the Oswestry outcome scale. Fifty percent of patients were satisfied with their surgery. Conclusions: This single-surgeon series of stand-alone BAK cages demonstrates significantly worse clinical outcomes than has been previously reported. The use of stand-alone BAK cages for degenerative disc disease should be reconsidered given the large number of patients with unacceptable outcomes.

AB - Background context: Multiple studies involving the outcomes of anterior interbody cages have been published, but the majority were by authors who designed the cage. No outcome studies with Bagby and Kuslich (BAK) cages implanted by a single-surgeon have either 3 years of follow-up or at least 25 patients. Purpose: To determine the 3- to 6-year clinical outcomes, including fusion rate, revision rate, complications and functional status of patients who underwent placement of anterior, stand-alone BAK cages by a single surgeon. Study design: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent anterior, stand-alone BAK cage placement by a single surgeon with a minimum of 3 years of follow-up. Patient sample: A total of 46 consecutive patients who underwent placement of anterior BAK cages from 1997 to 1999 were the study group. Outcome measures: Complications, fusion rate, revision rate, Prolo scores, Oswestry scores, pain scores, patient satisfaction. Methods: A retrospective review of charts of patients undergoing anterior stand-alone placement of BAK cages over the study period were reviewed. Demographic data were collected, and postoperative radiographs and clinic notes were reviewed. Patients were then contacted to complete a survey to determine Prolo and Oswestry scores, workers' compensation status and general satisfaction with the procedure. Patients were also asked to undergo repeat radiographs of their lumbar spine to determine if the operative levels had fused. Results: Follow-up was available on 33 of 46 patients (72%). At least 10 patients (22%) required revision surgery. Ten patients (22%) had 14 total complications not requiring revision surgery. Seventy percent of patients had a fair or poor outcome as assessed by the Prolo rating system, and 58% of patients had at least "severe disability" according to the Oswestry outcome scale. Fifty percent of patients were satisfied with their surgery. Conclusions: This single-surgeon series of stand-alone BAK cages demonstrates significantly worse clinical outcomes than has been previously reported. The use of stand-alone BAK cages for degenerative disc disease should be reconsidered given the large number of patients with unacceptable outcomes.

KW - BAK cages

KW - Complications

KW - Failures

KW - Outcomes

KW - Revision rate

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=14744296571&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=14744296571&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.06.021

DO - 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.06.021

M3 - Article

C2 - 15749615

AN - SCOPUS:14744296571

VL - 5

SP - 155

EP - 160

JO - Spine Journal

JF - Spine Journal

SN - 1529-9430

IS - 2

ER -