Thermal efficiency in sonotherapy array design

Douglas N. Stephens, Dustin E. Kruse, Chun Yen Lai, Arif S. Ergun, Stephen Barnes, Katherine W. Ferrara

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The use of ultrasound for therapeutic applications involving innovative drug delivery methodologies is a promising area of research to enhance the effectiveness of drug treatment to treat a wide range of diseases, including cancer, peripheral vascular disease, and stroke. Rather than use destructive heating, we have designed and built a family of multi-functional arrays which can ultrasonically identify a target tissue and produce mild heating within this specific tissue site for activated delivery of drug-encapsulated vehicles. These triple array probes are truly multifunctional, operating on a standard commercial imaging system. As sonotherapeutic devices, however, the internal heating and heat dissipation pathways are a concern for design optimization. We have compared three different triple-array probe designs for thermal efficiency and heat transfer characteristics. Each of these multifunctional arrays are comprised of a single center array row of 128 elements operating at 5.3 MHz for imaging, and two 1.5 MHz, 64 element outer arrays operated in parallel for sonotherapy. The laboratory verified KLM model for the low frequency array pair in each probe design has been used to derive estimates of array transmission power and efficiency. Using the key parameters of each design, we can determine the array heat source function and apply analytical expressions to explain the heat dissipation pathways in the probe itself. Our analytical techniques use simplifying assumptions and include the use of both equivalent lumped element thermal circuits for the transducer front port path, and a solution of the PDE heat equation for transient conduction with constant surface heat flux boundary conditions at the transducer backing. The metalized traces of the flex circuits act as the third heat escape pathway. The multifunctional array probes can be used to deliver up to 5 Watts of total acoustic power in mild hyperthermia experiments with small animals. Our analytical expressions have been verified with temperature measurements made in the array backing material and on the array surface. Our early design, the G3, has a triple layer array stack and flex circuit interface connections to support these layers; a later design, the G4, has only a single layer array piezoceramic but has an optimized front port for heat dissipation. The G5 has a further optimized front port and changes in array interconnects. These three probe designs have produced very different thermal dissipation power path distributions; the front, back, and flex trace heat path distributions for the three are a) 16%, 2%, 82%, b) 42%, 7%, 51%, and c) 86%, 8%, 6% for the G3, G4, and G5 designs respectively. These results can be directly related to optimized design features which improve the heat routing in sonotherapy array devices.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationProceedings - IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium
Pages666-669
Number of pages4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2008
Event2008 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium, IUS 2008 - Beijing, China
Duration: Nov 2 2008Nov 5 2008

Other

Other2008 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium, IUS 2008
CountryChina
CityBeijing
Period11/2/0811/5/08

Fingerprint

thermodynamic efficiency
probes
drugs
backups
cooling
heat
heating
delivery
transducers
dissipation
pulse detonation engines
power transmission
hyperthermia
design optimization
heat sources
strokes

Keywords

  • Array
  • Drug delivery
  • Liposome
  • Multifrequency
  • Sonotherapy
  • Thermal

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics

Cite this

Stephens, D. N., Kruse, D. E., Lai, C. Y., Ergun, A. S., Barnes, S., & Ferrara, K. W. (2008). Thermal efficiency in sonotherapy array design. In Proceedings - IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium (pp. 666-669). [4803502] https://doi.org/10.1109/ULTSYM.2008.0160

Thermal efficiency in sonotherapy array design. / Stephens, Douglas N.; Kruse, Dustin E.; Lai, Chun Yen; Ergun, Arif S.; Barnes, Stephen; Ferrara, Katherine W.

Proceedings - IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. 2008. p. 666-669 4803502.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Stephens, DN, Kruse, DE, Lai, CY, Ergun, AS, Barnes, S & Ferrara, KW 2008, Thermal efficiency in sonotherapy array design. in Proceedings - IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium., 4803502, pp. 666-669, 2008 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium, IUS 2008, Beijing, China, 11/2/08. https://doi.org/10.1109/ULTSYM.2008.0160
Stephens DN, Kruse DE, Lai CY, Ergun AS, Barnes S, Ferrara KW. Thermal efficiency in sonotherapy array design. In Proceedings - IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. 2008. p. 666-669. 4803502 https://doi.org/10.1109/ULTSYM.2008.0160
Stephens, Douglas N. ; Kruse, Dustin E. ; Lai, Chun Yen ; Ergun, Arif S. ; Barnes, Stephen ; Ferrara, Katherine W. / Thermal efficiency in sonotherapy array design. Proceedings - IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. 2008. pp. 666-669
@inproceedings{b68e88d33a674997b76edc7b316d292a,
title = "Thermal efficiency in sonotherapy array design",
abstract = "The use of ultrasound for therapeutic applications involving innovative drug delivery methodologies is a promising area of research to enhance the effectiveness of drug treatment to treat a wide range of diseases, including cancer, peripheral vascular disease, and stroke. Rather than use destructive heating, we have designed and built a family of multi-functional arrays which can ultrasonically identify a target tissue and produce mild heating within this specific tissue site for activated delivery of drug-encapsulated vehicles. These triple array probes are truly multifunctional, operating on a standard commercial imaging system. As sonotherapeutic devices, however, the internal heating and heat dissipation pathways are a concern for design optimization. We have compared three different triple-array probe designs for thermal efficiency and heat transfer characteristics. Each of these multifunctional arrays are comprised of a single center array row of 128 elements operating at 5.3 MHz for imaging, and two 1.5 MHz, 64 element outer arrays operated in parallel for sonotherapy. The laboratory verified KLM model for the low frequency array pair in each probe design has been used to derive estimates of array transmission power and efficiency. Using the key parameters of each design, we can determine the array heat source function and apply analytical expressions to explain the heat dissipation pathways in the probe itself. Our analytical techniques use simplifying assumptions and include the use of both equivalent lumped element thermal circuits for the transducer front port path, and a solution of the PDE heat equation for transient conduction with constant surface heat flux boundary conditions at the transducer backing. The metalized traces of the flex circuits act as the third heat escape pathway. The multifunctional array probes can be used to deliver up to 5 Watts of total acoustic power in mild hyperthermia experiments with small animals. Our analytical expressions have been verified with temperature measurements made in the array backing material and on the array surface. Our early design, the G3, has a triple layer array stack and flex circuit interface connections to support these layers; a later design, the G4, has only a single layer array piezoceramic but has an optimized front port for heat dissipation. The G5 has a further optimized front port and changes in array interconnects. These three probe designs have produced very different thermal dissipation power path distributions; the front, back, and flex trace heat path distributions for the three are a) 16{\%}, 2{\%}, 82{\%}, b) 42{\%}, 7{\%}, 51{\%}, and c) 86{\%}, 8{\%}, 6{\%} for the G3, G4, and G5 designs respectively. These results can be directly related to optimized design features which improve the heat routing in sonotherapy array devices.",
keywords = "Array, Drug delivery, Liposome, Multifrequency, Sonotherapy, Thermal",
author = "Stephens, {Douglas N.} and Kruse, {Dustin E.} and Lai, {Chun Yen} and Ergun, {Arif S.} and Stephen Barnes and Ferrara, {Katherine W.}",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1109/ULTSYM.2008.0160",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "666--669",
booktitle = "Proceedings - IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Thermal efficiency in sonotherapy array design

AU - Stephens, Douglas N.

AU - Kruse, Dustin E.

AU - Lai, Chun Yen

AU - Ergun, Arif S.

AU - Barnes, Stephen

AU - Ferrara, Katherine W.

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - The use of ultrasound for therapeutic applications involving innovative drug delivery methodologies is a promising area of research to enhance the effectiveness of drug treatment to treat a wide range of diseases, including cancer, peripheral vascular disease, and stroke. Rather than use destructive heating, we have designed and built a family of multi-functional arrays which can ultrasonically identify a target tissue and produce mild heating within this specific tissue site for activated delivery of drug-encapsulated vehicles. These triple array probes are truly multifunctional, operating on a standard commercial imaging system. As sonotherapeutic devices, however, the internal heating and heat dissipation pathways are a concern for design optimization. We have compared three different triple-array probe designs for thermal efficiency and heat transfer characteristics. Each of these multifunctional arrays are comprised of a single center array row of 128 elements operating at 5.3 MHz for imaging, and two 1.5 MHz, 64 element outer arrays operated in parallel for sonotherapy. The laboratory verified KLM model for the low frequency array pair in each probe design has been used to derive estimates of array transmission power and efficiency. Using the key parameters of each design, we can determine the array heat source function and apply analytical expressions to explain the heat dissipation pathways in the probe itself. Our analytical techniques use simplifying assumptions and include the use of both equivalent lumped element thermal circuits for the transducer front port path, and a solution of the PDE heat equation for transient conduction with constant surface heat flux boundary conditions at the transducer backing. The metalized traces of the flex circuits act as the third heat escape pathway. The multifunctional array probes can be used to deliver up to 5 Watts of total acoustic power in mild hyperthermia experiments with small animals. Our analytical expressions have been verified with temperature measurements made in the array backing material and on the array surface. Our early design, the G3, has a triple layer array stack and flex circuit interface connections to support these layers; a later design, the G4, has only a single layer array piezoceramic but has an optimized front port for heat dissipation. The G5 has a further optimized front port and changes in array interconnects. These three probe designs have produced very different thermal dissipation power path distributions; the front, back, and flex trace heat path distributions for the three are a) 16%, 2%, 82%, b) 42%, 7%, 51%, and c) 86%, 8%, 6% for the G3, G4, and G5 designs respectively. These results can be directly related to optimized design features which improve the heat routing in sonotherapy array devices.

AB - The use of ultrasound for therapeutic applications involving innovative drug delivery methodologies is a promising area of research to enhance the effectiveness of drug treatment to treat a wide range of diseases, including cancer, peripheral vascular disease, and stroke. Rather than use destructive heating, we have designed and built a family of multi-functional arrays which can ultrasonically identify a target tissue and produce mild heating within this specific tissue site for activated delivery of drug-encapsulated vehicles. These triple array probes are truly multifunctional, operating on a standard commercial imaging system. As sonotherapeutic devices, however, the internal heating and heat dissipation pathways are a concern for design optimization. We have compared three different triple-array probe designs for thermal efficiency and heat transfer characteristics. Each of these multifunctional arrays are comprised of a single center array row of 128 elements operating at 5.3 MHz for imaging, and two 1.5 MHz, 64 element outer arrays operated in parallel for sonotherapy. The laboratory verified KLM model for the low frequency array pair in each probe design has been used to derive estimates of array transmission power and efficiency. Using the key parameters of each design, we can determine the array heat source function and apply analytical expressions to explain the heat dissipation pathways in the probe itself. Our analytical techniques use simplifying assumptions and include the use of both equivalent lumped element thermal circuits for the transducer front port path, and a solution of the PDE heat equation for transient conduction with constant surface heat flux boundary conditions at the transducer backing. The metalized traces of the flex circuits act as the third heat escape pathway. The multifunctional array probes can be used to deliver up to 5 Watts of total acoustic power in mild hyperthermia experiments with small animals. Our analytical expressions have been verified with temperature measurements made in the array backing material and on the array surface. Our early design, the G3, has a triple layer array stack and flex circuit interface connections to support these layers; a later design, the G4, has only a single layer array piezoceramic but has an optimized front port for heat dissipation. The G5 has a further optimized front port and changes in array interconnects. These three probe designs have produced very different thermal dissipation power path distributions; the front, back, and flex trace heat path distributions for the three are a) 16%, 2%, 82%, b) 42%, 7%, 51%, and c) 86%, 8%, 6% for the G3, G4, and G5 designs respectively. These results can be directly related to optimized design features which improve the heat routing in sonotherapy array devices.

KW - Array

KW - Drug delivery

KW - Liposome

KW - Multifrequency

KW - Sonotherapy

KW - Thermal

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67649366622&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67649366622&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/ULTSYM.2008.0160

DO - 10.1109/ULTSYM.2008.0160

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:67649366622

SP - 666

EP - 669

BT - Proceedings - IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium

ER -