The value of trauma center care

Ellen J. MacKenzie, Sharada Weir, Frederick P. Rivara, Gregory Jurkovich, Avery B. Nathens, Weiwei Wang, Daniel O. Scharfstein, David S. Salkever

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

124 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The cost of trauma center care is high, raising questions about the value of a regionalized approach to trauma care. To address these concerns, we estimate 1-year and lifetime treatment costs and measure the cost-effectiveness of treatment at a Level I trauma center (TC) compared with a nontrauma center hospital (NTC). Methods: Estimates of cost-effectiveness were derived using data on 5,043 major trauma patients enrolled in the National Study on Costs and Outcomes of Trauma, a prospective cohort study of severely injured adult patients cared for in 69 hospitals in 14 states. Data on costs were derived from multiple sources including claims data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, UB92 hospital bills, and patient interviews. Cost-effectiveness was estimated as the ratio of the difference in costs (for treatment at a TC vs. NTC) divided by the difference in life years gained (and lives saved). We also measured cost-effectiveness per quality-adjusted life year gained where quality of life was measured using the SF-6D. We used inverse probability of treatment weighting to adjust for observable differences between patients treated at TCs and NTCs. Results: The added cost for treatment at a TC versus NTC was $36,319 per life-year gained ($790,931 per life saved) and $36,961 per quality-adjusted life years gained. Cost-effectiveness was more favorable for patients with injuries of higher versus lower severity and for younger versus older patients. Conclusions: Our findings provide evidence that regionalization of trauma care is not only effective but also it is cost-effective.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-10
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care
Volume69
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Trauma Centers
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Costs and Cost Analysis
Health Care Costs
Wounds and Injuries
Quality-Adjusted Life Years
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (U.S.)
Cohort Studies
Quality of Life
Prospective Studies
Interviews
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Cost effectiveness
  • Costs of trauma care
  • Trauma outcomes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

MacKenzie, E. J., Weir, S., Rivara, F. P., Jurkovich, G., Nathens, A. B., Wang, W., ... Salkever, D. S. (2010). The value of trauma center care. Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care, 69(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3181e03a21

The value of trauma center care. / MacKenzie, Ellen J.; Weir, Sharada; Rivara, Frederick P.; Jurkovich, Gregory; Nathens, Avery B.; Wang, Weiwei; Scharfstein, Daniel O.; Salkever, David S.

In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care, Vol. 69, No. 1, 01.07.2010, p. 1-10.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

MacKenzie, EJ, Weir, S, Rivara, FP, Jurkovich, G, Nathens, AB, Wang, W, Scharfstein, DO & Salkever, DS 2010, 'The value of trauma center care', Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3181e03a21
MacKenzie, Ellen J. ; Weir, Sharada ; Rivara, Frederick P. ; Jurkovich, Gregory ; Nathens, Avery B. ; Wang, Weiwei ; Scharfstein, Daniel O. ; Salkever, David S. / The value of trauma center care. In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care. 2010 ; Vol. 69, No. 1. pp. 1-10.
@article{00ed5c05fdba453eb37915fa70406221,
title = "The value of trauma center care",
abstract = "Background: The cost of trauma center care is high, raising questions about the value of a regionalized approach to trauma care. To address these concerns, we estimate 1-year and lifetime treatment costs and measure the cost-effectiveness of treatment at a Level I trauma center (TC) compared with a nontrauma center hospital (NTC). Methods: Estimates of cost-effectiveness were derived using data on 5,043 major trauma patients enrolled in the National Study on Costs and Outcomes of Trauma, a prospective cohort study of severely injured adult patients cared for in 69 hospitals in 14 states. Data on costs were derived from multiple sources including claims data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, UB92 hospital bills, and patient interviews. Cost-effectiveness was estimated as the ratio of the difference in costs (for treatment at a TC vs. NTC) divided by the difference in life years gained (and lives saved). We also measured cost-effectiveness per quality-adjusted life year gained where quality of life was measured using the SF-6D. We used inverse probability of treatment weighting to adjust for observable differences between patients treated at TCs and NTCs. Results: The added cost for treatment at a TC versus NTC was $36,319 per life-year gained ($790,931 per life saved) and $36,961 per quality-adjusted life years gained. Cost-effectiveness was more favorable for patients with injuries of higher versus lower severity and for younger versus older patients. Conclusions: Our findings provide evidence that regionalization of trauma care is not only effective but also it is cost-effective.",
keywords = "Cost effectiveness, Costs of trauma care, Trauma outcomes",
author = "MacKenzie, {Ellen J.} and Sharada Weir and Rivara, {Frederick P.} and Gregory Jurkovich and Nathens, {Avery B.} and Weiwei Wang and Scharfstein, {Daniel O.} and Salkever, {David S.}",
year = "2010",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/TA.0b013e3181e03a21",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "69",
pages = "1--10",
journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
issn = "2163-0755",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The value of trauma center care

AU - MacKenzie, Ellen J.

AU - Weir, Sharada

AU - Rivara, Frederick P.

AU - Jurkovich, Gregory

AU - Nathens, Avery B.

AU - Wang, Weiwei

AU - Scharfstein, Daniel O.

AU - Salkever, David S.

PY - 2010/7/1

Y1 - 2010/7/1

N2 - Background: The cost of trauma center care is high, raising questions about the value of a regionalized approach to trauma care. To address these concerns, we estimate 1-year and lifetime treatment costs and measure the cost-effectiveness of treatment at a Level I trauma center (TC) compared with a nontrauma center hospital (NTC). Methods: Estimates of cost-effectiveness were derived using data on 5,043 major trauma patients enrolled in the National Study on Costs and Outcomes of Trauma, a prospective cohort study of severely injured adult patients cared for in 69 hospitals in 14 states. Data on costs were derived from multiple sources including claims data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, UB92 hospital bills, and patient interviews. Cost-effectiveness was estimated as the ratio of the difference in costs (for treatment at a TC vs. NTC) divided by the difference in life years gained (and lives saved). We also measured cost-effectiveness per quality-adjusted life year gained where quality of life was measured using the SF-6D. We used inverse probability of treatment weighting to adjust for observable differences between patients treated at TCs and NTCs. Results: The added cost for treatment at a TC versus NTC was $36,319 per life-year gained ($790,931 per life saved) and $36,961 per quality-adjusted life years gained. Cost-effectiveness was more favorable for patients with injuries of higher versus lower severity and for younger versus older patients. Conclusions: Our findings provide evidence that regionalization of trauma care is not only effective but also it is cost-effective.

AB - Background: The cost of trauma center care is high, raising questions about the value of a regionalized approach to trauma care. To address these concerns, we estimate 1-year and lifetime treatment costs and measure the cost-effectiveness of treatment at a Level I trauma center (TC) compared with a nontrauma center hospital (NTC). Methods: Estimates of cost-effectiveness were derived using data on 5,043 major trauma patients enrolled in the National Study on Costs and Outcomes of Trauma, a prospective cohort study of severely injured adult patients cared for in 69 hospitals in 14 states. Data on costs were derived from multiple sources including claims data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, UB92 hospital bills, and patient interviews. Cost-effectiveness was estimated as the ratio of the difference in costs (for treatment at a TC vs. NTC) divided by the difference in life years gained (and lives saved). We also measured cost-effectiveness per quality-adjusted life year gained where quality of life was measured using the SF-6D. We used inverse probability of treatment weighting to adjust for observable differences between patients treated at TCs and NTCs. Results: The added cost for treatment at a TC versus NTC was $36,319 per life-year gained ($790,931 per life saved) and $36,961 per quality-adjusted life years gained. Cost-effectiveness was more favorable for patients with injuries of higher versus lower severity and for younger versus older patients. Conclusions: Our findings provide evidence that regionalization of trauma care is not only effective but also it is cost-effective.

KW - Cost effectiveness

KW - Costs of trauma care

KW - Trauma outcomes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77954693865&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77954693865&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181e03a21

DO - 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181e03a21

M3 - Article

VL - 69

SP - 1

EP - 10

JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

SN - 2163-0755

IS - 1

ER -